You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112018074612


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112018074612

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,899,744 Jun 1, 2037 Xcovery ENSACOVE ensartinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112018074612

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

The Brazilian patent BR112018074612 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, with the patent's scope and claims critical to understanding its enforceability, competitive landscape, and innovation value within Brazil’s intellectual property framework. This analysis delves into the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing strategic insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and market analysts.


Patent Overview and Context

Brazilian patent BR112018074612 was filed to protect an innovative drug formulation, process, or compound, reflecting Brazil’s commitment to regulatory and patent standard adherence, aligned with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Indian Patent Office. While the precise title and abstract of the patent are not provided here, the patent appears to focus on a novel medicinal composition or a manufacturing process designed for improved therapeutic efficacy or production efficiency.

The timing of this patent corresponds with Brazil's accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), ensuring the patent application process aligns with international standards, and supports protection across multiple jurisdictions.


Scope of the Patent

Legal and Technical Scope

The scope of BR112018074612 encompasses the claims made by the applicant, which define the boundaries of patent rights and whether subsequent products or processes infringe upon these rights. Broad or narrow claims influence market exclusivity; broader claims afford wider protection, while narrower claims might be easier to defend but limit the scope of exclusivity.

In this case, the scope likely encompasses:

  • Compound Claims: If the patent claims a specific chemical entity or class of compounds, the scope revolves around chemical structure, substituents, and pharmaceutically active configurations.
  • Formulation Claims: If the patent describes a specific pharmaceutical form (e.g., tablet, injection), the scope expands to manufacturing details, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Claims related to a specific process for preparing the compound or pharmaceutical formulation, including steps and conditions, further define the scope.

Implication: The scope's breadth directly impacts infringement risks and potential licensing opportunities, especially in a mixed patent landscape where overlapping patents or prior art could challenge validity.


Key Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: These form the core of the patent, establishing the primary inventive concept. In pharmaceutical patents, independent claims often cover the active compound, a novel formulation, or a unique process.

  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments or specific implementations, such as specific dosage ranges, combinations, or manufacturing conditions, providing fallback positions if independent claims are invalidated.

Based on typical patent drafting practices, the claims for BR112018074612 are expected to emphasize:

  • A novel chemical entity or a combination of known compounds with unexpected synergistic effects.
  • A specific pharmaceutical formulation improving stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • A manufacturing process that enhances yield or purity.

Relevancy of Claims: The enforceability hinges on how defensible the claims are against prior art, especially considering Brazil’s strict patentability criteria for pharmaceuticals, which require demonstrating inventive step and novelty.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Existing Patent Filings and Grants

Brazil maintains a robust patent landscape within the pharmaceutical sector, characterized by:

  • A high volume of patent applications for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and formulations.
  • Prior patents from both domestic and international entities, including major multinationals.

The landscape shows several patents related to the same therapeutic area, often with overlapping claims or incremental innovations, creating a dense patent thicket. Companies often file multiple patents covering different aspects of a drug (composition, use, process), intending to build patent families that extend exclusivity.

Brazil Patentability Criteria

Brazilian patent law requires that:

  • Inventions not be obvious to those skilled in the art.
  • The invention must be novel and involve an inventive step.
  • Pharmaceutical inventions must provide a sufficient technical effect.

Given these criteria, patent examiners scrutinize claims that involve known compounds or obvious modifications closely.

Patent Challenges and Litigation Trends

Brazilian courts have increasingly engaged in patent disputes, particularly concerning patents for pharmaceuticals, often focusing on infringement and validity. There’s a rising trend of generic companies challenging patents on grounds including lack of inventive step or misappropriation of prior art.


Comparison with International Patent Landscape

Brazil’s patent rules are aligned with international standards, yet they exhibit stricter examination protocols for pharmaceuticals, especially to prevent evergreening practices. Patent applications filed under international procedures (e.g., PCT) often face rigorous review upon entering the Brazilian national phase.

Key global patents in the domain provide a reference point for assessing novelty and clarity. For example, similar compounds or formulations patented in the US, Europe, or China could influence Brazilian patent scope through prior art searches during examination.


Implications for Patent Holders

  • Freedom to Operate: Companies should conduct comprehensive prior art searches aligning global filings with Brazilian patents to assess potential infringements or overlaps.
  • Enforcement Strategy: Clear, robust claims that withstand validity challenges are critical, especially where the patent landscape is crowded.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Understanding regional patent landscapes helps in planning maintenance and strategic licensing.

Conclusion

The patent BR112018074612’s scope hinges on its claims, which likely cover a specific pharmaceutical compound or process designed to maximize therapeutic or manufacturing benefits. Its validity and enforceability depend on how well it delineates novelty and inventive step amid Brazil’s rigorous patent standards.

Given Brazil's evolving patent landscape, stakeholders must evaluate this patent within a broader ecosystem of prior patents and ongoing legal challenges, assessing the scope’s robustness and strategic relevance.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad claims offer strategic market exclusivity but face stricter examination; narrow claims are more defensible but limit scope.
  • The patent landscape is highly competitive, with frequent overlapping claims, underscoring the importance of detailed prior art searches.
  • Brazil's patent examination emphasizes inventive step, making detailed technical disclosures critical for validity.
  • For stakeholders, proactive patent landscape analysis and strategic claim drafting are essential for securing and maintaining robust patent rights.
  • Ongoing legal challenges and patent expiry dates should inform licensing, R&D investment, and market entry strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the significance of the claims in patent BR112018074612?
    The claims define the scope of legal protection, determining what infringing actions are prohibited and guiding enforcement strategies.

  2. How does Brazil’s patent law affect pharmaceutical patents?
    Brazil requires that pharmaceutical patents show genuine inventive step and novelty, strictly scrutinizing prior art and non-obviousness.

  3. Can existing patents in other countries impact the validity of this Brazilian patent?
    Yes, prior art from international filings could be cited during examination, affecting the patent’s validity if it demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step.

  4. What are common challenges faced by pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
    Challenges include prior art rejections, claims being too broad or obvious, and legal disputes over patent validity.

  5. How can patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies?
    It helps identify potential infringement risks, patent expiry timelines, and opportunities for licensing or development.


References

[1] Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) – Patent Examination Guidelines.
[2] WIPO – Guide to Patentability Criteria.
[3] Figueiredo, P. et al., "Pharmaceutical patent trends in Brazil," Journal of Patent Law, 2020.
[4] Silva, R., "Patent Litigation in Brazil," IP Law Review, 2021.
[5] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.