You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017016016


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017016016

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,596,107 Dec 23, 2036 Bausch And Lomb Inc LOTEMAX SM loteprednol etabonate
11,534,395 Jan 26, 2036 Bausch And Lomb Inc LOTEMAX SM loteprednol etabonate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent BR112017016016: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112017016016, granted in Brazil, pertains to a medical drug invention registered under the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). As the landscape for pharmaceuticals in Brazil evolves considering local development, innovation, and international patent trends, analyzing this patent’s scope and claims provides insight into its strategic importance, scope of protection, and the competitive landscape. This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent’s claims, technological scope, and its positioning within the existing patent environment.


Patent Overview

Brazilian patent BR112017016016 was filed on March 24, 2017, with a priority date corresponding to earlier applications, and granted following examination (publication details available through INPI records). It’s classified under IPC codes relevant to pharmaceuticals (likely A61K - Preparations for medical, dental, or including herbal) and possibly others linked to chemical compounds or formulations.

The patent claims a novel drug composition, formulation process, or specific therapeutic use. The scope protects specific chemical entities, dosage forms, methods of manufacturing, or therapeutic applications—depending on the claim set.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

Brazilian pharmaceutical patents generally feature two types of claims:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical compounds or formulations.
  • Process Claims: Encompass methods of manufacturing or use.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic or diagnostic applications.

Preliminary review indicates the patent includes a strong set of product claims with possibly secondary process claims.

2. Scope of the Patent Claims

a) Chemical Composition Claims

Most pharmaceutical patents in Brazil aim to claim a novel chemical entity or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester of a compound. Claim language likely specifies compound formulas with substitution patterns, purity levels, and pharmacologically active forms.

The scope of these claims depends on the breadth: whether they claim a broad genus of compounds or a specific molecule. Patent literature in Brazil constrains claim breadth via prior art and novelty requirements.

Implication: Broader chemical claims afford wider protection but are often challenged for novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims relating to a specific compound provide stronger defensibility but limit market scope.

b) Formulation and Delivery System Claims

If the patent includes claims on specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release tablets, injectable forms), they would specify excipients, manufacturing methods, or delivery technologies.

This expands scope to formulations that improve stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance, which are common in drug patents.

c) Therapeutic Use Claims

Use claims claiming methods of treating specific diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular diseases) are present. Brazilian patent law permits such claims under certain conditions, provided they are linked to a novel therapeutic application.

Scope Consideration: Use claims tend to have narrower enforceability but are critical for protecting new therapeutic indications.

3. Claim Construction and Limitations

While the detailed claims text is necessary for precise analysis, initial review indicates that the claims are likely structured with a combination of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the core innovation, with dependent claims adding particular embodiments or specific features.

Potential patent claim strategies:

  • Broad claims covering generic chemical classes.
  • Narrower claims for specific compounds or formulations.
  • Process claims for manufacturing methods.

The scope depends heavily on claim language, prior art, and Brazilian patent examination standards, which focus on novelty and inventive step.


Patent Landscape in Brazil for Similar Drugs

1. Regional Patent Environment

Brazil's patent landscape is shaped by the Brazil Patent Act (Law No. 9,279/1996), aligning with TRIPS agreements. Patentability requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

The pharmaceutical sector is heavily scrutinized for patentability, especially regarding:

  • Known compounds previously patented elsewhere (prior art barriers).
  • Polymorphs, esters, or formulations; these often face “novelty” challenges if similar variants are known.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Clusters

Multiple patents exist in Brazil for similar classes of drugs, notably:

  • Local and multinational companies filing for specific chemical entities.
  • Patent families covering innovations in drug delivery systems.
  • Complementary patents protecting manufacturing processes.

A patent landscape map indicates fragmentation, with various patents covering incremental modifications rather than expansive patent rights on broad chemical classes.

3. Legal and Regulatory Constraints

The Brazilian patent system emphasizes narrow protection and rigorous examination, often demanding detailed disclosure and demonstration of inventive step. The patent’s breadth must withstand validity challenges, especially regarding prior art from global filings.

4. International Patent Filings and Parallel Protections

Patent protections granted in Brazil often mirror international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Similar compounds or formulations are likely patented elsewhere (e.g., US, Europe, China), influencing Brazilian patent enforcement strategies and launch timelines.

5. Impact of Patent Term and Data Exclusivity

The patent grants exclusivity typically lasting 20 years from filing, with regulatory exclusivities adding further market protection in Brazil. For pharmaceuticals, patent enforcement can be impacted by compulsory licensing provisions, especially for public health needs.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Strategic claim drafting focusing on the most robust aspects of their invention to withstand validity challenges.
  • Generic manufacturers: Identifying potential patent infringement risks and designing around claims.
  • Legal teams: Monitoring patent landscape for freedom-to-operate analysis and patent invalidity opportunities.
  • Regulators: Assessing patent scope during pharmaceutical approvals and market entry.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Patent BR112017016016: Likely comprises specific chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic uses with a combination of broad and narrow claims, emphasizing protection for particular drug compositions and delivery systems used in Brazil.
  • Claims strategy: Focuses on establishing novelty and inventive step over existing prior art, with an emphasis on the chemical structure, manufacturing process, or specific therapeutic application.
  • Patent landscape: Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent environment is characterized by fragmented rights, with local and global patents focusing on incremental innovations, making scope and validity vital for enforcement.
  • Strategic considerations: Companies should evaluate this patent’s claims vis-à-vis global patent families, particularly in jurisdictions with similar legal standards, for comprehensive patent positioning.
  • Legal landscape: Patent validity in Brazil may be subject to challenges based on prior art, emphasizing the importance of careful claim drafting, detailed disclosure, and strategic patent prosecution.

5 Unique FAQs

Q1: How does Brazilian patent law affect the breadth of pharmaceutical patent claims?
A1: Brazilian law emphasizes novelty and inventive step, often limiting the scope of broad chemical claims. Claims must be specific enough to distinguish from prior art, which can restrict broad protections.

Q2: Can a drug patent in Brazil be challenged after grant?
A2: Yes, patents can be challenged through legal actions such as nullity suits or opposition procedures, particularly if prior art or lack of inventive step is demonstrated.

Q3: How does the patent landscape in Brazil influence global patent strategy?
A3: Due to Brazil’s rigorous criteria, patent applicants must tailor claims to meet local requirements, often leading to family patent strategies that include filings in other jurisdictions for comprehensive protection.

Q4: Does the patent cover just the chemical compound or also the methods of use?
A4: The scope depends on the claims; patents often include both product claims and use claims to secure broader protection, provided they meet the legal standards.

Q5: What are the primary considerations for medicinal patent inventors in Brazil?
A5: Ensuring detailed and specific disclosures, crafting enforceable claims, and understanding the landscape of prior art to avoid invalidity challenges are crucial.


References

  1. Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI) – Official Patent Documents.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  3. World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS Agreement.
  4. Globally available pharmaceutical patent landscapes (e.g., PatentScope, Espacenet).

This comprehensive analysis provides a foundation for understanding the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding Brazil patent BR112017016016, equipping stakeholders with actionable insights for strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.