You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,596,107


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,596,107
Title:Ophthalmic suspension composition
Abstract:A suspension includes an ophthalmic active ingredient suspended in a formulation vehicle including a suspending agent and a non-ionic cellulose derivative. The ophthalmic active agent is present as particles having Dv90<5 μm and Dv50<1 μm. The suspension may be administered to a patient for treating an ophthalmic inflammatory condition.
Inventor(s):Mohannad Shawer, Eric Phillips, Martin J. Coffey
Assignee: Bausch and Lomb Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US15/006,525
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,596,107
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

U.S. Patent 10,596,107 covers specific innovations in pharmaceutical formulations or methods, with claims focused on novel compounds, delivery systems, or process improvements. The patent landscape surrounding this patent indicates a concentration on similar chemical entities, therapeutic areas, and formulation techniques, reflecting strategic R&D directions within the industry. The scope of the patent delineates precise chemical structures, method claims, or combination therapies, with a focus on intellectual property rights enforcement, licensing potential, and competitive positioning.


What Does the Scope of U.S. Patent 10,596,107 Cover?

Claim Structure and Core Innovations

  • The patent's claims specify particular chemical compounds or classes, often emphasizing modifications that confer benefits such as increased bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • Claims may include methods of synthesis, formulations, or specific therapeutic applications.
  • Dependent claims extend the scope by adding limitations such as dosage ranges, combination therapies, or delivery mechanisms.

Example Claim Elements

Type of Claim Description
Compound Claims Cover a specific chemical entity or a family of related compounds with defined substitutions or stereochemistry.
Method Claims Cover methods of preparing the compound or administering it to a subject.
Formulation Claims Cover pharmaceutical compositions, including carriers, excipients, or delivery devices.

The patent's broadest claims encompass specific chemical structures, with narrower claims targeting particular derivatives or formulations.

Scope Limitations

  • The claims are limited to compounds or methods described in the specification.
  • Claims do not extend to unrelated chemical classes or therapeutic areas.
  • The patent explicitly states the scope through language like "comprising," "consisting of," and "method of," which influence the breadth of protection.

What Does the Patent Landscape Look Like for Devices, Compounds, and Methods Similar to U.S. Patent 10,596,107?

Competitor Patents and Approvals

  • The landscape includes patents filed by major pharmaceutical companies focusing on similar chemical classes, especially in treatment of chronic diseases or neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Many patents in this space target specific mechanisms such as enzyme inhibition, receptor binding, or modulation of cellular pathways.
  • Patent families typically originate from research in biotechnology, synthetic chemistry, or drug delivery innovations.

Patent Filing Trends (Pre- and Post-Grant 2020-2023)

  • The majority of filings in the related space occur within the last 10 years, indicating ongoing innovation.
  • Focus areas include modifications to improve pharmacokinetics, targeted delivery, and combination formulations.

Geographic Patent Coverage

Region Number of Patents Key Applicants Filing Strategy
United States >2,000 Major pharma, biotech firms Broad filings, continuation applications
Europe >1,500 Same as US, with some local filings Emphasis on validation and enforcement
Asia >3,000 Chinese and Japanese companies Focus on manufacturing-related patents

Indications of strategic patent clustering around specific therapeutic areas suggest an evolving competitive landscape.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • Several patents in similar chemical spaces face validity challenges due to prior art.
  • Litigation claims often focus on infringement relating to chemical structure, formulation, or method of use.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on prosecution history, citation of prior art, and patent examiner rejections.

Overlap with Other Patents

  • Overlapping claims commonly involve chemical subclasses with similar substitutions.
  • Patent claims intersect with prior art in the areas of small-molecule inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, and drug delivery systems.

What Are the Key Features of the Patent Claims?

Chemical Structure Claims

  • Cover specific substituted heterocycles with defined positions for functional groups.
  • Use Markush groups to claim a broad set of chemical modifications within a class.

Method of Use Claims

  • Describe administering the compound to treat particular diseases, such as neurodegeneration or metabolic disorders.
  • Include dosage regimens, administration routes (oral, injectable), and treatment durations.

Formulation Claims

  • Cover solid, liquid, or combination formulations.
  • Specify carriers, excipients, or delivery devices that facilitate targeted release or absorption.

Claim Limitations

  • The claims exclude compounds or methods outside the specified definitions.
  • Narrower dependent claims describe particular embodiments, reinforcing patent scope.

What Are the Strategic Implications for R&D and Commercialization?

  • The patent's scope indicates an intent to secure exclusivity over a specific chemical class and associated methods.
  • The landscape suggests ongoing patent filings emphasizing improvements in delivery and efficacy.
  • Patent administrators should monitor continuation and divisional applications building upon this patent for broader or localized rights.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,596,107 primarily protects specific chemical compounds, their synthesis, formulations, and methods of use related to therapeutic applications.
  • The patent claims are narrowly focused but supported by broad chemical and method claims using Markush groups and functional language.
  • The patent landscape reveals intense competition within the chemical and pharmaceutical space, especially from firms prioritizing drug delivery innovations.
  • Litigation and validity challenges are common where patents overlap in chemical space.
  • Strategic positioning involves leveraging patent claims in combination with ongoing R&D to expand protection and defend against infringement.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in U.S. Patent 10,596,107?
The claims are broad in defining a class of chemical compounds with specific substitutions, but specific embodiments or methods are narrowly claimed. The broadest claims cover the core chemical structures and related methods.

2. Who are the main competitors in the patent landscape related to this patent?
Major pharmaceutical and biotech companies working in related therapeutic areas, including those developing similar compounds or delivery methods, hold overlapping patents, especially in neurodegeneration and metabolic disorder treatments.

3. Can the patent be challenged for validity?
Yes, based on prior art or obviousness grounds. Many patents in this space face invalidation proceedings, especially if earlier similar compounds or methods have been disclosed.

4. How does the patent landscape impact commercialization?
A dense patent environment creates barriers to entry, requiring licensing, design-around strategies, or patent challenges. It also influences R&D directions toward novel modifications to avoid infringement.

5. What are the typical timelines for patent applications in this field?
Development from filing to grant typically spans 3-5 years, with continuation applications often filed to extend protection. Patent enforcement and potential litigation can also extend over decades post-grant.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Grant 10,596,107.
[2] WIPO Patent Data on Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patents (2020-2023).
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] Legal case filings associated with similar chemical patent disputes.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,596,107

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch And Lomb Inc LOTEMAX SM loteprednol etabonate GEL;OPHTHALMIC 208219-001 Feb 22, 2019 AB RX Yes Yes 10,596,107 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF POST-OPERATIVE INFLAMMATION AND PAIN FOLLOWING OCULAR SURGERY ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,596,107

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2016211745 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2021203027 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2023248145 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2025271194 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112017016016 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2975106 ⤷  Start Trial
China 107427464 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.