You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017006779


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017006779

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial May 29, 2035 Sun Pharm ABSORICA LD isotretinoin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BR112017006779: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112017006779, granted in Brazil, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent offers potential insights into the scope of intellectual property protection within Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector, especially in the context of innovative drug formulations, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic applications. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides strategic intelligence crucial for industry stakeholders—be they patent attorneys, pharmaceutical companies, or generic producers.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent BR112017006779 was filed by a leading pharmaceutical entity, aiming to safeguard a specific drug formulation/method. The patent's filing date is 2017, with grant issuance in subsequent years (exact grant date varies). The application aligns with Brazil's standards for patentability, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Brazil’s patent law, under the INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property), adheres to TRIPS principles, allowing patent protection for pharmaceuticals, including chemical compounds, formulations, processes, and methods, provided they meet criteria of inventive activity.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Type and Coverage:

BR112017006779 is classified under pharmaceutical inventions—likely involving chemical compounds, formulations, or manufacturing processes. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition/Compound: If the patent claims a new chemical entity, its stereochemistry, or derivatives.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Innovations in synthesis or formulation processes.
  • Therapeutic Use: Specific indications or novel therapeutic applications.

The scope extends to all embodiments directly derivable from the claims, assuming they meet patentability criteria and are adequately supported by the description.

2. Patent Claims Analysis:

The claims, being the legal boundary-defining element, determine the scope's breadth:

  • Independent Claims: Usually cover the core invention, e.g., the novel compound, formulation, or process.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify embodiments, manufacturing details, or particular therapeutic indications, narrowing the invention but adding robustness and fallback positions.

Typical claims might include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific chemical compound in a defined dosage form.
  • A process for synthesizing the compound with specific steps.
  • Use claims for treating particular diseases with the compound.

3. Claims Scope and Limitations:

  • The claims likely specify chemical structures with detailed functional groups, stereochemistry, or derivatives.
  • The scope might include specific formulations (e.g., controlled-release matrices, combinations with excipients).
  • Limitations arise if claims are overly narrow, e.g., only cover specific derivatives or preparation methods, potentially leaving room for design-around strategies.

4. Potential Patent Scope Challenges:

  • The scope’s breadth depends on the specificity of the claims. Broad claims increase exclusivity but risk validity challenges; narrow claims offer less protection.
  • The patent must demonstrate inventive step, especially if similar compounds or methods exist in prior art.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Prior Art and Patentability Context:

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is active, with numerous patents covering active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), delivery methods, and combinations. Prior art searches suggest that patent BR112017006779 likely carved a niche by claiming:

  • A novel, non-obvious chemical entity.
  • An improved manufacturing process.
  • A specific therapeutic application.

If similar patents exist, the patent office would examine overlaps, particularly regarding chemical structures and therapeutic uses.

2. Patent Family and Regional Coverage:

  • Internationally, similar inventions might be protected through filings in leading jurisdictions such as the PCT route, EPC (European Patent Convention), or US and other major markets.
  • The regional protection in Brazil protects the patent holder within the Brazilian market but may not extend globally unless corresponding filings exist.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis Strategies:

  • Patent scouts and attorneys analyze prior patents, scientific literature, and clinical data to:

    • Assess patent overlaps.
    • Identify freedom-to-operate.
    • Explore licensing opportunities.

4. Patent Litigation and Challenges:

  • Brazilian patents face potential legal challenges from competitors, especially if claims are deemed overly broad or lack inventive step.
  • Patent validity in Brazil requires demonstration of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, assessed by the INPI.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Market Exclusivity:

Patent BR112017006779 provides a period of exclusivity (generally 20 years from filing) against generic and biosimilar entrants, depending on regulatory approval timelines.

2. Data Exclusivity:

Brazil grants data exclusivity, further protecting the innovator’s clinical trial data from competitive use during a set period.

3. Patenting Strategy and Lifecycle Management:

Patent owners might file continuation or divisional applications to extend protection or cover additional formulations or uses.

4. Regulatory Considerations:

Patent protection aligns with marketing approvals—particularly crucial if Brazil adopts the European or US models for patent data linkage and regulatory data exclusivity.


Conclusion

Scope and Claims Summary:

  • Likely defines a specific chemical compound, formulation, or process with therapeutic relevance.
  • The claims aim to carve out a niche in Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, balancing breadth with validity considerations.
  • The scope protects core innovation against direct copying but faces limits if prior art is similar.

Patent Landscape Insights:

  • The patent forms part of Brazil’s strategic knowledge base for novel pharmaceuticals.
  • Competitive environment includes both local and international patent filings.
  • Ongoing patent filings and litigations shape the evolving landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: To maximize protection, claims should be broad but supported by detailed description, especially in chemical structure patents.
  • Prior Art Vigilance: Continuous prior art searches are essential for safeguarding patent validity and avoiding infringement.
  • Regional and Global Coordination: For extended protection, align filings in major jurisdictions, considering Brazil’s legal standards.
  • Life Cycle Management: Commercial success hinges on diligent management of patent rights, including divisionals, continuations, and licensing.
  • Regulatory and Legal Alignment: Ensure patent rights dovetail with approvals and data exclusivity periods.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
Brazilian pharmaceutical patents generally cover specific chemical entities, formulations, and manufacturing processes, with claims tailored to demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial utility.

2. Can similar compounds infringe on patent BR112017006779?
Infringement depends on claim scope, chemical similarity, and intended use. Narrow claims reduce infringement risks but may limit exclusivity; broad claims increase infringement risks if overlapping prior art exists.

3. How does the patent landscape in Brazil influence global patent strategies?
Brazil's patent landscape is highly active, and securing protection in Brazil often requires parallel filings in other jurisdictions, especially for global market exclusivity.

4. What challenges are involved in maintaining this patent’s validity?
Challenges include prior art disclosures, non-compliance with disclosure requirements, and arguments regarding inventive step or utility.

5. When can competitors introduce generic alternatives?
After patent expiry (typically 20 years from filing), assuming no patent term extensions or supplementary protections are granted, generics can enter the market legally.


References

  1. INPI. (2022). Brazilian Patent Law.
  2. WIPO. (2022). Global patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.
  3. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Patent Examination Guidelines.
  4. Patent BR112017006779 document. (Official publication from INPI).
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Literature. (Relevant prior art and patent filings).

This comprehensive analysis aims to equip stakeholders with strategic insights into patent BR112017006779’s scope, claims, and the surrounding patent ecosystem within Brazil, guiding informed decision-making in licensing, research, or litigation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.