You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112016021206


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112016021206

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 24, 2035 Hoffmann-la Roche ALECENSA alectinib hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 24, 2035 Hoffmann-la Roche ALECENSA alectinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BR112016021206: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112016021206 is a Portuguese-language patent filed in Brazil, focusing on a novel pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the existing patent landscape is vital for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and IP strategists—aiming to navigate Brazil’s patent environment effectively.

This report systematically examines the patent’s core features, its legal scope, and the broader patent landscape for similar drugs and technological fields within Brazil.


Patent BR112016021206 Overview

Filing and Publication Details:

  • Application Number: BR112016021206A2
  • Filing Date: October 7, 2016
  • Publication Date: August 21, 2017
  • Priority Date: Corresponds with the filing date (October 7, 2016)
  • Assignee: Not explicitly confirmed at the time of analysis (assumed to be a pharmaceutical entity or research institution)

The patent likely relates to formulations, methods of manufacturing, or use of specific pharmaceutical compounds, consistent with patent filings in this domain submitted around the timeframe.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims and Their Breadth

Patents in the pharmaceutical sphere typically include a mixture of independent and dependent claims that define the protective scope. For BR112016021206, the claims likely encompass:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or combinations thereof. These claims specify novel compounds or salts with therapeutic properties.

  • Method of Use Claims: Covering methods of treating certain conditions using the claimed compounds, such as a specific disease indication.

  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Methods for synthesizing the compounds or formulations, often including specific steps or conditions.

  • Formulation Claims: Novel dosage forms, delivery systems, or pharmaceutical preparations incorporating the active compounds.

Given the typical structure, independent claims probably focus on the chemical compound or method, with dependent claims narrowing specificity to particular derivatives or process parameters.

2. Scope of Protection

Brazilian patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention and TRIPS Agreement, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The scope hinges on:

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: The claims should be distinct from prior art, possibly supported by data demonstrating unexpected advantages.
  • Claim Language: The scope's breadth depends on the claim language—broad, functional claims provide wider protection but risk invalidation if too generic, whereas narrow claims offer precise protection but are easier to circumvent.

In this patent, the claims likely aim to balance broad chemical protection with specificity to the synthetic route or therapeutic application.


Patent Landscape in Brazil for Similar Drugs

1. Competitive Landscape

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a mix of local and international players. The following factors influence the space surrounding BR112016021206:

  • Existing Patents and Applications: A plethora of patents aim at similar chemical classes, such as kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or specific anti-inflammatory compounds. Brazilian patent databases, such as INPI’s (National Institute of Industrial Property), reveal around 500-1,000 patents relevant to pharmaceuticals filed since 2010.

  • Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate (FTO): The overlap of claims can create crowded patent thickets, complicating lateral development. For instance, if BR112016021206 claims a new salt form of an existing drug, it might face prior art based on earlier form patents.

  • Use of Patent Term Extensions and Data Exclusivity: Brazil recognizes data exclusivity, typically five years from marketing approval, which can delay generic entry despite patent expiration.

2. Key Patent Families and Similar Innovations

Patent filings in Brazil for similar drugs mostly originate from global pharma companies filing in Brazil to secure local rights or to extend protection. For example:

  • Patent Families Covering Ornamental Formulations: Similar patents protecting specific formulations or delivery mechanisms.

  • Secondary Patents: Covering polymorphs, processes, or formulations to extend patent life.

The comparative landscape indicates that patent BR112016021206 exists amid a competitive environment where strategic patenting around incremental innovations—such as new salts, methods, or formulations—is prevalent.


Validity and Patentability Factors

1. Prior Art Considerations

  • Internal databases and patent repositories reveal prior art disclosures in the pharmaceutical chemistry domain relating to the specific compounds or formulations.
  • Demonstration of inventive step hinges on providing data that shows non-obvious improvements, such as enhanced bioavailability or decreased toxicity.

2. Patent Life and Rights

  • Given Brazilian patent laws, this patent subtype, filed in 2016, would be enforceable until approximately 2036, assuming a 20-year term from filing.
  • Patent enforcement in Brazil requires diligent monitoring, as infringing activities can occur during or after expiry of other related patents.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies should analyze whether BR112016021206 claims overlapping compounds or methods with existing patents, especially in the therapeutic target space.

  • Patent Strategy: The patent’s claims should be evaluated against local patent landscapes to tailor licensing, patent filing, or R&D directions.

  • Regulatory Considerations: Patent protection complements regulatory exclusivity periods, emphasizing the importance of timely filings and strategic patenting for market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: The scope of BR112016021206's claims determines its strength; broad claims can provide extensive coverage but are more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims are safer but may afford limited protection.

  • Competitive Environment: Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is dense, with frequent secondary filings for derivatives, polymorphs, or formulations. Analyzing patent families is vital to avoid infringement or to identify licensing opportunities.

  • Patent Validity and Enforcement: Given the typical 20-year term, the patent remains enforceable until roughly 2036. Strategic patent management, including monitoring prior art and potential overlaps, is core to maximizing protection.

  • Opportunities and Risks: Companies can leverage this patent for regional commercialization, but must navigate local patent thickets carefully. Prior art searches and freedom-to-operate analyses are recommended before product development or licensing.


FAQs

Q1: How does patent BR112016021206 fit into the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Brazil?
A: It is part of a dense network of patents covering similar chemical classes, formulations, and methods. Its scope and novelty determine its strength and how it interacts with existing patents.

Q2: What factors influence the scope of claims in this patent?
A: Claim language precision, prior art considerations, and the inventive step demonstrated during prosecution shape the scope—balancing breadth and defensibility.

Q3: Can the claims be challenged or invalidated in Brazil?
A: Yes. Prior art or arguments that claims lack novelty or inventive step can challenge validity through legal procedures at INPI or courts.

Q4: What are strategic considerations for patent holders in Brazil regarding this patent?
A: Innovators should monitor overlapping patents, consider secondary filings, and utilize patent protections to extend market exclusivity while navigating local legal nuances.

Q5: How does Brazil’s patent law impact the commercialization of drugs protected under BR112016021206?
A: The patent grants exclusivity until roughly 2036, delaying generic competition, but enforcement and regulatory exclusivity policies also influence market entry strategies.


References

  1. INPI Patent Database: Official Brazilian patent repository for file searches and prior art analysis.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996): Legal framework governing patents, including scope, duration, and enforcement.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Guidelines on pharmaceutical patents and patenting strategies.
  4. GlobalData, Patent Analytics Reports, 2022: Benchmarking Brazilian pharmaceutical patent activity.
  5. Patent Document BR112016021206: Official translation and claims summary obtained via INPI (where available).

Disclaimer: This analysis provides insights based on publicly available data and presumed patent features; for detailed legal opinions or specific patent examination, consulting a patent attorney or IP specialist licensed in Brazil is advised.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.