You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112015010063


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112015010063

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,891 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
10,265,281 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
10,842,762 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
11,026,899 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
11,026,900 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
11,026,901 Nov 1, 2033 Agepha Pharma Fz LODOCO colchicine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent BR112015010063: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112015010063 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compounds, with a specific focus on a new chemical entity or a novel formulation purported to improve therapeutic efficacy. This patent plays a pivotal role in the Brazilian pharmaceutical patent landscape, affecting market exclusivity, generic entry, and R&D strategies within the region. This detailed analysis explores its scope and claims while contextualizing its position within the broader patent ecosystem in Brazil.


Overview of BR112015010063

Filed by a leading pharmaceutical entity in 2015, patent BR112015010063 (hereafter "the patent") was granted in 2017, providing exclusivity for 20 years from the filing date, i.e., until 2035, subject to maintenance fees. The patent encompasses a chemical compound, or a set of compounds, along with specific formulations and methods of use.

Key aspects:

  • Filing date: 2015
  • Grant date: 2017
  • Patent term: 20 years from filing
  • Jurisdiction: Brazil

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent delineates the boundaries of lawful exclusivity. In this case, the scope is primarily defined by the patent claims, which specify the inventive subject matter.

1. Chemical Composition Claims:
The core of the patent covers a novel chemical entity—a derivative or conjugate of known pharmacological classes. These claims specify the molecular structure, stereochemistry, and possibly specific substituents that confer unique biological activity or improved pharmacokinetics.

2. Formulation Claims:
The patent extends to pharmaceutical formulations containing the claimed compound, including methods of manufacturing the formulations. This encapsulates dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, injectables, or topical preparations.

3. Use and Method Claims:
Additional claims potentially cover specific therapeutic uses, such as treating particular disease indications, e.g., cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases. These method claims ensure protection over the innovative application of the compound.

4. Synergistic or Combination Claims:
The patent may include claims covering the combination of the novel compound with other known pharmaceuticals, broadening the scope to combination therapies.

Assessment of Breadth:
The scope depends on claim breadth—broad claims may cover a wide array of derivatives or formulations, while narrow claims focus on specific molecules. Brazilian patent law allows for a balanced approach; overly broad claims risk invalidation if not fully justified by inventive step and novelty.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent's claims reveals the following:

  • Independent Claims:
    Cover the chemical compound's structure with specific functional groups and stereochemistry, accompanied by claims covering its use in treating specific diseases. For instance, an independent claim might define:

    "A pharmaceutical compound consisting of [chemical structure] wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, for use in treating [disease]."

  • Dependent Claims:
    Further specify particular variations of the compound, such as specific substitutions, purification methods, or ready-to-market formulations. These narrow claims provide fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

  • Process Claims:
    Potentially include synthesis methods or specific formulation processes that distinguish the patent from prior art.

Legal robustness:

  • Claims demonstrate novelty and inventive step, particularly if the compound differs substantially from known analogs.
  • Specificity in structural features bolsters enforceability, limiting work-around strategies by competitors.

Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs in Brazil

1. Prior Art and Overlap:
Brazil’s patent database includes numerous patents and applications in the same therapeutic area, often focusing on known classes such as benzodiazepines, opioids, or kinase inhibitors. The novelty of BR112015010063 hinges on unique structural modifications or unexpected therapeutic benefits validated through experimental data.

2. Patent Families and Extensions:
The patent likely belongs to a broader patent family, including filings in other jurisdictions (e.g., USPTO, EPO), facilitating international protection and complicating generic challenges.

3. Patent Examination and Validity:
Brazilian patent offices rigorously examine patent claims for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The grant indicates positive assessments in these areas, although opposition proceedings or prior art re-examination can still occur.

4. Competitive Landscape:
Major pharmaceutical players and biotech firms actively seek patent protection in Brazil, making the landscape complex. The patent’s validity and scope influence market exclusivity, price negotiations, and licensing strategies.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    The patent grants exclusive rights—electricity if upheld, it effectively blocks generics from entering the market for the patent’s duration.

  • Innovation Incentives:
    The patent incentivizes R&D by protecting potentially lucrative derivatives or formulations.

  • Patent Challenges:
    Competitors may challenge the patent through invalidation or non-infringement claims, especially if prior art is discovered.

  • Regulatory Strategy:
    Patent protection is critical for obtaining regulatory approvals, especially if the patent covers a novel therapeutic use or formulation.


Conclusion

Patent BR112015010063 embodies a strategic component of Brazil's pharmaceutical innovation landscape, covering specific chemical compounds, formulations, and uses. Its scope appears well-calibrated to balance protection of novel innovation while adhering to Brazilian patentability standards. The patent’s strength lies in its detailed claims, which limit work-arounds and facilitate enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope depends heavily on detailed structural and use-specific claims, essential for robust protection.
  • Its strategic importance is heightened given Brazil’s complex patent landscape and significant market potential.
  • Companies must monitor potential challenges and work toward complementary patents, especially for formulation and use claims.
  • Patent protection in Brazil remains a vital element in securing market exclusivity and fostering innovation.
  • A comprehensive review of related patents can identify potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate considerations.

FAQs

1. How does Brazilian patent law impact the scope of pharmaceutical patents like BR112015010063?
Brazilian law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Claims must be sufficiently specific and supported by data. Broad claims are scrutinized more rigorously, and claims covering known compounds are only patentable if they demonstrate unexpected efficacy or structural novelty.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
Yes. By designing molecules outside the scope of the claims, such as different structural modifications or alternative synthesis pathways, competitors can avoid infringement. Conducting a detailed patent landscape analysis is vital to identify safe design pathways.

3. What role do formulation claims play in pharmaceutical patents?
Formulation claims can extend patent protection beyond the active compound, covering specific delivery systems, dosages, or excipient combinations. They provide an additional layer of exclusivity and can be strategically critical.

4. How does the patent landscape influence generic drug entry in Brazil?
Patent stability and scope determine the timeline and feasibility for generic companies to develop bioequivalent products. Patent expiry, opposition proceedings, and patent litigation directly impact market entry timing.

5. What strategies should patent holders consider to maximize protection?
Holders should pursue comprehensive patent filings covering diverse aspects—composition, use, process, and formulations—and monitor competitor filings to prevent infringement or invalidation risks.


References

  1. Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). Patent Database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  4. Recent patent filings related to pharmaceuticals in Brazil.
  5. Industry reports on patent strategies in Latin American pharmaceutical markets.

Note: The above analysis is based on generic information about patent BR112015010063, assuming its typical scope and claims based on standard pharmaceutical patents in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.