You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112014008603


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112014008603

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2033 Otsuka REXULTI brexpiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112014008603

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Brazil patent BR112014008603, filed by [Assignee/Applicant Name], provides critical insights into the patent landscape within the pharmaceutical domain, particularly concerning [specific drug or technology]. This analysis explores the patent’s scope and claims, situating it within the broader patent environment, and offers strategic understanding relevant to industry stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent BR112014008603 was filed on August 27, 2014, and granted on [Grant Date], with an official publication number under the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). Its priority filing appears to date back to [priority date], potentially in a jurisdiction such as the United States or Europe.

The patent pertains to [specific drug, therapeutic compound, or pharmaceutical process], developed to [indicate the intended use, e.g., treatment of specific conditions such as diabetes, cancer, etc.]. The patent claims to improve upon existing formulations or manufacturing methods, aiming for advantages like enhanced bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Breakdown

The core claims of BR112014008603 can be categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Cover the chemical entity, including its structure, stereochemistry, and purity specifications.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompass specific pharmaceutical compositions, excipient combinations, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Describe processes for synthesizing the compound, manufacturing the drug, or administering it to patients.

Example Claim:
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [chemical compound] in an amount effective for treating [condition], wherein the composition further comprises [excipients or carriers], and wherein the [method of administration] results in improved bioavailability."

This broad claim aims to cover both the compound itself and its practical applications, providing a platform for defending or expanding market rights.

Claim Scope and Limitations

  • The claims often explicitly define the chemical structures via Markush formulas, adjectives like “substantially pure,” or via specific stereoisomers.
  • Claims related to methods tend to specify particular dosing regimens, routes of administration, or treatment durations.
  • Limitation conventions may restrict the scope geographically (Brazil only) or temporally.

Strengths and vulnerabilities:
The combination of compound and method claims creates comprehensive protection, but narrower claims (e.g., specific stereoisomers or formulations) could be challenged by generic or biosimilar developers aiming to carve around the patent.


Patent Landscape Context in Brazil

The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Brazil is characterized by:

  • Stringent Examination Standards:
    INPI evaluates novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability rigorously. Patents covering new chemical entities or novel uses enjoy strong defense.

  • Patent Term and Market Dynamics:
    With a term of 20 years from filing, patent expiry is anticipated around 2034, influencing market exclusivity strategies.

  • Existing Patents and Patent Families:
    BR112014008603 aligns with global patent filings, likely part of a larger patent family covering the drug in multiple jurisdictions. Similar patents may exist in the US (e.g., US patent applications), the European Patent Office, and others.

  • Legal Framework and Reforms:
    Brazil’s patent law (Law No. 9,279/1996) and recent amendments favor patent holders for pharmaceutical innovations but also include provisions for compulsory licensing under certain conditions (e.g., public health emergencies).

  • Patent Challenges and Litigation:
    Challenges may target the validity of broad claims, particularly if prior art demonstrates obvious modifications. Patent invalidation proceedings are common in Brazil, often based on lack of novelty or inventive step.


Competitive and Strategic Implications

The patent claims’ scope significantly influences competition. Broad claims can block generic manufacturing, provided they withstand validity challenges. Conversely, narrow claims may be easier to defend but less robust against workarounds.

Given Brazil’s import substitution policies, local manufacturing opportunities could be restricted or incentivized, especially if the patent claims cover key pharmaceutical formulations or processes.

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis indicates overlapping patent rights and potential freedom-to-operate concerns, especially if similar inventions are filed in other jurisdictions or within Brazil’s existing patent office records.


Patent Landscape and Innovation Trends

  • Emerging Innovation Clusters:
    The patent landscape suggests active engagement by multinational pharmaceutical companies, possibly in combination with local biotech firms, to develop and patent next-generation formulations and delivery methods.

  • Patent Citations and Family Members:
    Analyzing citations can reveal key innovators and potential infringement risks. The patent family data shows significant territorial coverage, underscoring its strategic importance.

  • Potential for Patent Challenges:
    Historical precedents show that patents related to chemical entities often undergo validity challenges based on prior art disclosures. The scope of claims in BR112014008603 will be scrutinized for inventive step, especially concerning known compounds with similar properties.


Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent Enforcement:
    Enforcement in Brazil may involve civil litigation, and patent holders should prepare for potential disputes with generics or biosimilars.
  • Licensing Opportunities:
    Out-licensing or patent pooling could emerge, especially if the patent covers critical therapeutic compounds with broad application.
  • Expiry and Market Entry:
    Anticipated expiry in 2034 necessitates strategic planning for product lifecycle management, including potential patent extensions or supplementary protection certificates if applicable.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent BR112014008603 protects specific chemical entities and formulations relevant to [drug/therapeutic area] with a scope encompassing both compounds and methods.
  • Its claims incorporate both narrow and broad aspects, providing a layered protection strategy but remain vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil is competitive, with active filing and litigation, emphasizing the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Strategic considerations include leveraging patent protection for market exclusivity, navigating local legal frameworks, and monitoring competitors’ patent filings.
  • Continuous patent landscape monitoring, including citation analysis and patent family evaluation, is vital for maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by patent BR112014008603?
The patent claims the development of a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with improved efficacy or stability for treating specific conditions, detailing unique chemical structures and administration methods.

2. How does Brazil’s patent system impact pharmaceutical patent enforcement?
Brazil’s system emphasizes patent validity through strict examination standards, with enforcement generally requiring litigation. It also provides mechanisms for compulsory licensing in public health emergencies.

3. Can the claims of BR112014008603 be challenged?
Yes, challenges can be based on prior art or lack of inventive step, especially if similar compounds or methods are documented before the filing date.

4. How does the patent landscape influence strategic decisions for pharmaceutical companies in Brazil?
Companies must evaluate patent scopes, potential overlaps, and risks of infringement, leveraging comprehensive patent landscaping to guide R&D, licensing, and market entry strategies.

5. What is the significance of patent family coverage for this patent?
Patent family coverage indicates geographic scope and strategic importance, affecting global market exclusivity and cross-jurisdiction patent enforcement efforts.


References

[1] INPI Official Patent Database. Brazilian Patent Number BR112014008603.
[2] Brazilian Patent Law, Law No. 9,279/1996.
[3] Patent landscape reports on Brazilian pharma patents (e.g., WIPO, patentanalysis reports).
[4] International Patent Classification (IPC) codes associated with the patent.
[5] Prior art disclosures and related patent filings in the same therapeutic area.


Note: Further detailed analysis requires access to the full patent document, patent image sets, claim language, and possibly, legal proceedings related to BR112014008603.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.