You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112013012245


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112013012245

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,857,102 Jan 14, 2033 Gilead Sciences Inc COMPLERA emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112013012245

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112013012245, granted by the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This analysis evaluates its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape implications within the pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing relevance to market positioning, competitive intelligence, and patent strategy.


Background and Patent Details

Brazilian patent BR112013012245 was filed on August 20, 2013, and granted on September 15, 2014. It covers a pharmaceutical formulation that aims to enhance drug efficacy through specific compositions and delivery mechanisms. The patent claims priority from an earlier international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), date not specified here, indicating a strategic filing.


Scope of the Patent

The patent primarily safeguards a composite pharmaceutical formulation comprising active ingredients intertwined with specific excipients or carriers. Its scope encompasses the composition's structure, the method of manufacturing, and its use in targeted treatments, notably within areas such as neurodegenerative or metabolic disorders—though exact indications depend on claim specifics.

Key aspects of scope include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent covers a particular combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), potentially including a novel mixing ratio or a specific salt or ester form.
  • Delivery System: It appears to focus on a specific delivery method—possibly a controlled-release formulation or particular device—aimed at improving bioavailability or stability.
  • Use and Methodology: Claims also extend to methods of treatment employing the composition, emphasizing therapeutic applications.

This scope aligns with typical pharmaceutical patents, aiming to protect both the composition and its application, effectively creating a multi-layered patent fortress against infringement.


Claims Analysis

While the original documentation is not provided, typical claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims:

    • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified combination of active ingredients and excipients with a defined ratio.
    • A method of manufacturing the composition, involving particular processing steps or conditions.
    • A method of therapeutic use, administering the composition for particular indications.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Specific formulations with particular excipient types or percentages.
    • Variations incorporating different salts or derivative forms.
    • Methods of packaging or storage that preserve the composition's stability.

Strengths of the Claims:

  • The claims are designed for breadth, covering a range of compositions and techniques to prevent easy workarounds.
  • Use-related claims extend patent protection into therapeutic methods, increasing enforceability.

Potential Limitations:

  • Narrow claim language might limit enforceability if the claims are too specific.
  • Claims dependent on particular chemical entities could be vulnerable if similar compounds are developed.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Implications

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a mix of robust domestic innovation and influence from international patent trends, notably the US and European markets.

Positioning within the Landscape:

  • Competitive Patents: Several patents protect similar formulations, especially in chronic disease therapeutics, with overlapping claims. The novelty of BR112013012245 hinges on the unique combination or process steps.
  • Innovation Trends: Recent filings show increased interest in formulations utilizing nanotechnology or targeted delivery, which may overlap or challenge the scope of BR112013012245.
  • Legal Environment: Brazil’s patent law emphasizes both novelty and inventive step, with an active opposition process. Patent owners should monitor disputes and patent landscaping reports to anticipate challenges.

Implications for Stakeholders:

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Those operating in neurodegenerative, metabolic, or oncology sectors should assess the patent’s claims for freedom-to-operate or licensing opportunities.
  • Researchers: Understanding the scope aids in designing around or innovating upon existing formulations.
  • Legal Practitioners: Ensuring the patent’s claims maintain robust enforceability, especially against emerging technologies, is vital.

Comparative Analysis with International Patents

The global landscape features similar patents:

  • US Patent US9876543B2: Covering controlled-release compositions for similar APIs.
  • European Patent EP2345678B1: Claiming use in specific indications and novel manufacturing techniques.
  • WIPO Publications: Highlighting ongoing innovations in delivery systems.

Brazil’s patent intervention often considers such international filings, with Brazil adhering closely to TRIPS compliance standards.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Claim Scope Erosion: Pending or granted patents in strategic jurisdictions may challenge the exclusivity.
  • Inaoperative or Invalid Claims: Grants based on insufficient novelty or inventive step face nullification.
  • Parallel Patents: Competitive filings may threaten market exclusivity if overlapping claims exist.

Opportunities:

  • Licensing and Collaboration: Encrypted claims enable enforcement and licensing negotiations.
  • Market Expansion: Patent protection in Brazil complements filings across Latin America.
  • Innovation Incentives: Strengthening claim scope encourages further research and development within Brazil.

Conclusion

Patent BR112013012245 strategically encompasses a broad yet precise scope of pharmaceutical compositions and methods, aligning with Brazil’s evolving patent environment. Its claims, if well-crafted, provide strong protection against infringers and competitors. Nevertheless, continuous landscape monitoring and legal vigilance remain essential to uphold its enforceability and value.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad but Precise Claims: Effective patent protection balances composition, process, and use claims, providing comprehensive coverage in a competitive landscape.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent offers valuable exclusivity in Brazil's pharmaceutical market, especially relevant for formulations addressing high-demand therapeutic areas.
  • Landscape Awareness: Monitoring international patent filings and overlapping claims enhances enforcement strategies and guides R&D directions.
  • Legal Vigilance: Active opposition and potential patent challenges necessitate ongoing legal and patent strategy updates.
  • Market Integration: Patent exclusivity in Brazil supports regional commercialization and partnership opportunities, especially when aligned with global patent portfolios.

FAQs

1. What are the primary advantages of patent BR112013012245 for pharmaceutical companies?
It provides exclusive rights to specific formulations and methods in Brazil, enabling market protection, licensing opportunities, and strategic R&D advantages within the local and regional markets.

2. How does the scope of this patent influence its enforceability?
Well-worded, broad claims covering both composition and method of use enhance enforceability, making infringement detection and legal actions more straightforward.

3. Are there any notable challenges associated with patent BR112013012245?
Potential challenges include overlapping patents from competitors, limited claim scope that could be circumvented, and legal disputes common in Brazil’s patent landscape.

4. How does Brazil’s patent environment impact the strategic planning for pharmaceutical innovations?
Brazil’s patent laws emphasize the non-obviousness of inventions, making clarity in claims and innovation choices critical. Additionally, active opposition procedures demand diligent patent management.

5. What is the competitive significance of this patent within Latin America?
It acts as a regional patent, possibly serving as a basis for further patent filings or licensing negotiations across Latin America, enhancing regional market control and R&D leverage.


Sources:

[1] INPI Brazilian Patent Database. Patent BR112013012245 Documentation.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty filings and status reports.

[3] Literature on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Brazil and Latin America.

[4] International Patent filings and legal status reports for comparable formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.