You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112012000204


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112012000204

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,420,763 Jun 11, 2030 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
9,044,475 Jun 11, 2030 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
9,326,981 Jun 11, 2030 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
9,669,019 Jun 11, 2030 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BR112012000204: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112012000204, filed under Brazil’s patent system, provides a strategic insight into drug patenting within Latin America’s prominent pharmaceutical market. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape offers vital understanding for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and market analysts seeking to navigate patent exclusivities, licensing opportunities, and competitive landscapes in Brazil.


Patent Overview

Patent Title: Likely pertaining to a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of treatment, based on Brazil’s patent classification system (INPI).
Filing Date: 2012 (as indicated by the number)
Publication Number: BR112012000204 (Brazilian application published in 2012)
Legal Status: Pending or granted (subject to further verification)
Patent Office: Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), Brazil

The patent’s strategic value hinges upon the patentability of the specific compound, formulation, or method, and its enforceability within Brazil and possibly other jurisdictions if patent families exist.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Categorization

Brazilian patents for drugs generally cover:

  • Chemical compounds or novel molecules
  • Pharmacological formulations
  • Methods of synthesis or manufacturing
  • Therapeutic or diagnostic methods

The scope of BR112012000204 should be examined through its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent.

2. Nature of the Patent Claims

While exact claim language requires direct review, typical claims in drug patents can be classified as:

  • Product Claims: Covering the chemical compound or active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) itself.
  • Use Claims: Covering an application of the compound for specific indications.
  • Method Claims: Encompassing methods of synthesis, formulation, or administration.

An analysis of the patent’s claims indicates whether it emphasizes the chemical entity, a novel formulation, or an innovative method.

3. Claim Analysis

a. Primary Claims

  • Likely cover a specific chemical structure or analog that is novel and non-obvious, evidenced by common patterns in the pharmaceutical patent literature.
  • May specify the compound’s physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic effects, or therapeutic efficacy.

b. Dependent Claims

  • Further specify embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, combinations, or delivery methods, enhancing the patent’s scope.

c. Priority and Novelty

  • The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating novelty over prior art, including existing pharmaceutical patents, scientific publications, or generic literature.

In Brazil, patentability hinges on whether the claimed invention is novel, inventive, and adequately disclosed, according to Brazilian patent law [1].


Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceutical Innovations

1. Patent Filings and Trends

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects:

  • Incremental Innovation: Emphasis on formulations, improved methods, and derivatives rather than entirely new compounds, due to patent law restrictions following the Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  • Patent Thickets: Clusters of patents around key drug classes, such as antidepressants, statins, and biologics.
  • Patent Challenges: Recent legislative changes and patent office expertise levels influence patent prosecution quality and grant rates.

Data indicates an upward trend in patent applications for pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil during the early 2010s, aligning with the filing date of BR112012000204.

2. International Patent Family and Repertoire

  • In many cases, such patents are part of larger patent families filed globally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Enforcement in Brazil complements global patent protection strategies, especially in South America and Latin America.

3. Patent Litigation and Enforcement

Although patent litigation remains less extensive than in the U.S. or Europe, Brazil’s courts have shown increasing willingness to scrutinize patent validity and enforceability, especially for drugs with high commercial value or patent disputes.


Legal and Regulatory Context

Brazilian Patent Law Constraints:

  • Product patents for pharmaceuticals are generally granted if the invention brings a new chemical entity or innovative formulation [2].
  • Evergreening practices are scrutinized to prevent unjust extension of patent life via minor modifications.
  • Compulsory Licensing: The government can issue licenses in cases of public health emergencies, affecting patent enforceability.

Regulatory Approval:

The patent also interacts with ANVISA’s (National Health Surveillance Agency) regulatory approval processes, which may impact market exclusivity duration.


Impacted Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Leverage patent exclusivity for market positioning.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must navigate patent landscapes to avoid infringement or challenge patents.
  • Legal Professionals: Require comprehension of claim scope to assess litigation or licensing opportunities.
  • Regulators: Monitor patent quality to balance innovation incentives and access.

Conclusion

The patent BR112012000204 exemplifies the complex interplay between chemical innovation, legal patentability criteria, and market dynamics within Brazil. Its scope depends tightly on the defined claims and their novelty over existing prior art. Given Brazil's evolving patent environment, the patent’s enforceability and strategic importance hinge upon ongoing legal interpretations, patent prosecution quality, and compliance with local patent law.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim clarity and breadth: The patent’s value relies on well-drafted claims covering core chemical entities or formulations without overreach.
  • Landscape competitiveness: Brazil’s patent environment favors incremental innovation; understanding existing patent clusters is essential.
  • Legal robustness: Validity challenges or licensing must consider Brazil’s patentability standards, especially for pharmaceuticals.
  • Regulatory alignment: Patent strategies should incorporate ANVISA approval processes and potential public health safeguards like compulsory licensing.
  • Global strategies: Incorporating Brazilian patent filings into broader patent family planning enhances regional and international market protection.

FAQs

Q1: How does Brazil’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patentability?
A1: Brazil’s patent law permits pharma patents for new chemical entities and innovative formulations but restricts patents on methods of medical treatment. The law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Q2: Can the claims in BR112012000204 be challenged for validity?
A2: Yes, through legal proceedings such as nullity actions, particularly if prior art shows the invention is not novel or inventive under Brazilian standards.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence generic drug entry in Brazil?
A3: Patents can delay generic entry; legal challenges or patent expiration open pathways for generics, often influenced by patent litigation or licensing.

Q4: What role do patent claims play in market exclusivity?
A4: Broad claims securing the core active ingredient or method effectively extend market exclusivity if upheld against challenges.

Q5: Are patent filings in Brazil enforceable internationally?
A5: Not directly; patents are territorial. However, filings within Brazil may be part of global patent strategies via PCT applications or national filings elsewhere.


References

[1] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[2] INPI Official Guidelines on Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.