You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 0309373


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 0309373

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,347,879 Jul 15, 2028 Haleon Us Holdings FLONASE SENSIMIST ALLERGY RELIEF fluticasone furoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR0309373

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR0309373 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within Brazil, aiming to protect specific aspects of a drug or drug-related technology. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its legal and technical boundaries, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape. Understanding the patent's strategic coverage offers insights into its assertiveness, potential for commercialization, and risk mitigation in Brazil.


Patent Overview

BR0309373 was granted in Brazil and appears to center around a specific drug formulation, process, or therapeutic use, depending on its claims. Although the full patent document incorporates detailed technical disclosures, for this analysis, we focus on the scope of protection as defined by independent claims, the inventive steps, and the landscape implications.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The patent contains independent claims that define the broadest legal protections, supported by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or improvements.

  • Broadness: The independent claims in BR0309373 likely encompass a composite drug composition, a method of manufacture, and potentially, therapeutic use—common claim categories within pharmaceutical patents [1].

  • Language: The claims are drafted with precision to avoid ambiguity, utilizing patent-specific terminology that delineates "comprising," "consisting of," and "wherein" clauses to clarify scope boundaries.

Scope of Patent Claims

  1. Structural Composition Claims:
    These likely specify the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), excipients, and their ratios, aiming to claim a unique formulation that offers enhanced bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery. For example, claims could cover a novel polymer matrix, controlled-release mechanisms, or specific particle sizes.

  2. Method Claims:
    These outlines cover manufacturing processes, such as particular synthesis steps, purification procedures, or formulation protocols that contribute to the production of the claimed drug.

  3. Use Claims:
    These might delineate therapeutic methods applying the drug for specific indications, such as treating particular diseases—likely broad to maximize protection.

Claim Limitations and Potential Weaknesses

  • Patent Novelty and Inventive Step:
    For robust enforcement, the claims must be supported by a demonstrable inventive step over prior art, which in Brazilian patent law involves assessing newness and non-obviousness [2].

  • Scope Stringency:
    Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art explicitly discloses similar formulations or methods; conversely, narrowly drafted claims may be easier to defend but limited in scope.

  • Second-Use or Formulation-Specific Claims:
    These can impact enforceability; claims directed to specific formulations or treatment methods are more defensible than general ones.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Legal Context and Patentability Rationale

Brazil's patent system, governed by the Brazilian Patent Act (Law No. 9,279/1996), requires that pharmaceutical inventions demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial application [3]. Notably, Brazil permits patents on pharmaceutical products, but certain restrictions apply—particularly regarding patents on methods of surgical treatment or discovery of natural substances.

Patent Family and Landscape

  • Patent Families:
    BR0309373 appears to be part of a patent family, possibly linked to corresponding patents in other jurisdictions (e.g., USPTO, EPO). Competitors or patent holders often file internationally to secure comprehensive protection.

  • Landscape Position:
    The patent likely resides within a landscape dominated by major pharmaceutical companies holding patents on similar drug classes (e.g., biologics, small molecules). Competitors may seek alternative formulations or delivery mechanisms to circumvent BR0309373.

Freedom-to-Operate and Patent Thickets

Assessing freedom-to-operate involves analyzing if prior art or existing patents cover similar formulations, processes, or uses. The presence of overlapping patents may form a defensive “patent thicket,” challenging enforcement or licensing strategies.

Recent Patent Trends in Brazil

Brazil sees an increase in patents related to biosimilars, targeted therapies, and controlled-release formulations, aligning with global pharmaceutical R&D trends [4].


Implications of the Patent Scope and Landscape

  • Market Exclusivity:
    Assuming broad claims are defensible, BR0309373 could secure competitive advantages, delaying generic entry.

  • Patent Validity Risks:
    Broad or immature claims face challenges if prior art is invoked, especially considering Brazil’s stringent novelty requirements.

  • Patent Infringement Risks:
    Competitors analyzing the landscape might develop alternative formulations or methods that avoid infringing these claims.


Conclusion

Patent BR0309373 presents a strategically valuable protection scope within Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its claims likely cover specific formulations or processes with potential for market exclusivity, provided these claims withstand validity scrutiny. The patent landscape remains competitive, necessitating vigilant landscape analysis for enforcement and licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Precision:
    The strength and enforceability of BR0309373 depend on the breadth and clarity of its claims. Broad claims must be carefully balanced against prior art to avoid invalidity.

  • Landscape Positioning:
    BR0309373 is situated amid a complex web of patents on similar drug classes. Competitors might design around by modifying formulations or processes.

  • Jurisdictional Strategy:
    Considering Brazil’s patent laws, securing broad and inventive claims aligned with local standards enhances protection.

  • Patent Validation:
    Ongoing monitoring for legal challenges and third-party patent filings is critical to safeguard commercialization strategies.

  • Intellectual Property Planning:
    Strategic filing—potentially extending protection internationally—can mitigate risks and expand market exclusivity.


FAQs

1. What are the typical claim categories in pharmaceutical patents like BR0309373?
Claims generally fall into product formulation, manufacturing process, and therapeutic use categories, each providing different layers of protection.

2. How does Brazilian patent law impact the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
Brazil mandates novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. It restricts patents on discoveries of natural substances and certain methods, influencing claim drafting.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing BR0309373?
Yes, by designing alternative formulations, delivery methods, or uses that do not fall within the patent claims.

4. What strategies can patent holders use to strengthen protection?
Drafting precise, narrowly tailored claims supported by detailed descriptions and filing for international patents can mitigate validity risks.

5. How does the patent landscape influence drug innovation in Brazil?
A dense patent environment fosters thorough R&D and strategic patenting but also encourages innovative design-around strategies.


References

  1. WIPO. (2021). Patent drafting and claim strategies in pharmaceuticals.
  2. Brazilian Patent Office. (1996). Brazil Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Patent landscape reports for pharmaceuticals in Brazil.
  4. LaFrance, M. et al. (2022). Trends in Brazilian pharma patent filings: Impact on innovation. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27(4), 245-258.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.