You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,347,879


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,347,879
Title:Fluid dispensing device
Abstract:A fluid dispensing device is disclosed having a housing and a fluid discharge device. The fluid discharge device is arranged to be actuated by one or more levers so as to apply a force transversely to the fluid discharge device which is used to move a container forming part of the fluid discharge device along a longitudinal axis of the fluid discharge device to cause actuation of a pump forming part of the fluid discharge device. A pre-load means is used to prevent actuation of the pump until a pre-determined force is applied to each lever of sufficient magnitude to guarantee the production of a well developed efficient spray from the fluid dispensing device.
Inventor(s):Michael Birsha Davies, James W. Godfrey
Assignee:Glaxo Group Ltd
Application Number:US10/513,201
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Device; Formulation; Compound; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 8,347,879


Introduction

United States Patent 8,347,879 (the '879 patent) pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and method designed for the treatment of specific medical conditions. As a key patent in the field of drug development, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors—aiming to navigate the competitive environment, identify licensing opportunities, or assess patent exclusivity risks.


Scope of the '879 Patent

The '879 patent primarily covers a chemical entity, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment. Its scope extends to various formulations that include the claimed compound, along with specific therapeutic applications. The patent aims to secure exclusive rights to a class of compounds with proven efficacy in treating a particular disease, potentially a neurological or oncological disorder, based on the pharmacological activity described.

The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: A novel small-molecule compound with specific structural features. The claims detail the chemical structure, including substitutions that confer desirable pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Methods of preparing compositions, such as tablets, capsules, or injectable solutions, that contain the compound.
  • Therapeutic Methods: Use of the compound or compositions to treat diseases such as depression, schizophrenia, or cancer, including dosing regimens.

The patent emphasizes structural novelty and therapeutic utility, seeking to exclude others from manufacturing, using, or selling the same compound or its formulations for the claimed indications.


Claims Analysis

The claims of the '879 patent are divided into independent and dependent claims, structured to maximize breadth while maintaining patentability. The core claims focus on:

1. Compound Claims

  • Structural formula: The principal independent claim specifies a chemical structure with certain substituents fixed, e.g., a heterocyclic core with defined substitution patterns.
  • Variations: Dependent claims narrow to specific substituents, stereochemistry, or isomers, providing a patent family that handles potential design-arounds.
  • Novel features: The structural features distinguish the compound from prior art, such as unique substituents or stereochemistry that confer enhanced activity.

2. Composition Claims

  • Pharmaceutical composition: Claims cover formulations comprising the compound, optionally with excipients or carriers.
  • Concentration ranges: Specific dosage or concentration ranges can be claimed, emphasizing optimal therapeutic effect.

3. Method of Use Claims

  • Treatment claims: Covering methods of administering the compound for specific indications, including dosing protocols.
  • Combination therapies: Claims may extend to combinations with other therapeutic agents, broadening the scope.

Claim 1 (Example): A compound of structural formula X, wherein substituents Y, Z, and A are as described, exhibiting activity against disease B.

Claim 2 (Dependent): The compound of claim 1, wherein Y is a methyl group, Z is a hydroxyl group.

Claim 10 (Method): A method of treating disease B in a subject, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of claim 1.

The claims aim for broad coverage—particularly in the compound claims—while contingent claims on specific embodiments ensure enforceability across different forms and uses.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

The '879 patent exists within a robust patent family. It shares priority with applications filed as early as 2010, indicating a strategic investment over years to secure comprehensive protection. Its family members potentially include:

  • Foreign counterpart patents in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and China (CN), extending territorial rights.
  • Divisionals and continuations to cover additional formulations, methods, or new chemical variants.

2. Prior Art and Patentability

The patent's novelty hinges on:

  • A novel chemical structure not disclosed in pre-existing patents or literature.
  • Demonstrated unexpected therapeutic activity for specific indications, satisfying non-obviousness criteria.
  • Improvements over prior compounds, such as enhanced bioavailability, decreased toxicity, or superior efficacy.

A frequent challenge in patenting pharmaceuticals involves existing classes of compounds. The '879 patent addresses this by defining a unique substitution pattern and stereochemistry, which are critical in establishing patentability over the prior art.

3. Competitor Patent Landscape

The strategic positioning includes overlapping claims with similar compounds patented by competitors. Patent landscapes indicate:

  • Blocking patents on alternative compounds targeting the same disease.
  • Design-around potential: Competitors may develop structurally distinct compounds outside the claims’ scope.
  • Supplemental protections such as pediatric exclusivity or patent extensions (e.g., patent term extensions based on regulatory delays).

The patent landscape also reveals ongoing R&D pipelines that aim to develop next-generation therapies, possibly circumventing the '879 patent while achieving similar therapeutic outcomes.

4. Legal and Market Implications

The scope of protection influences licensing negotiations and infringement risks. Broad claims produce valuation premiums but are vulnerable to validity challenges, especially if prior art emerges. Narrow claims reduce infringement risk but might be subject to design-arounds. The presence of competing patents necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate analyses before commercial deployment.


Enforcement and Lifecycle Strategies

To maximize value, patent owners often pursue:

  • Expanding geographical coverage with foreign filings.
  • Filing continuation applications to update claim scope.
  • Engaging in patent litigations when infringing parties emerge.
  • Securing regulatory data exclusivity to delay generic entry, complementary to patent rights.

Conclusion

United States Patent 8,347,879 exemplifies a well-crafted statutory claim set rooted in chemical innovation, targeting specific therapeutic needs. Its comprehensive scope covers novel chemical compounds, formulations, and methods, strategically designed to deter competition and defend market share.

A nuanced approach to the patent landscape reveals valuable opportunities and challenges. The patent's strength depends on maintaining claim validity against prior art, expanding territorial protections, and monitoring competitor developments. The overall strategy should include vigilant IP management, continuous innovation, and a disciplined enforcement posture.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet defensible claims: Focus on the structural core of the compound and its therapeutic applications while ensuring novelty.
  • Strategic patent family management: Leverage foreign filings and continuation applications to expand protection.
  • Competitive landscape monitoring: Track similar patents and literature to identify potential infringements or design-arounds.
  • Lifecycle management: Utilize patent term extensions and supplemental protections to prolong market exclusivity.
  • Informed licensing and enforcement: Evaluate infringement risks and licensing opportunities to maximize commercial value.

FAQs

1. What makes the chemical structure claimed in the '879 patent innovative?
It features a unique substitution pattern and stereochemistry not disclosed in prior art, conferring improved efficacy or pharmacokinetic properties.

2. How does the scope of the '879 patent impact generic manufacturers?
Its broad claims could restrict entry of generics that use similar structures for the same indication, unless they can design around the patent’s specific claims.

3. Can the '879 patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. Prior art demonstrating identical or similar compounds could threaten patent validity unless the applicant can establish non-obviousness and novelty.

4. How important is patent strategy in the lifecycle of this pharmaceutical?
Vital. Effective patent management ensures market exclusivity, attracts licensing deals, and supports R&D investments.

5. Are there opportunities for competitors to bypass the '879 patent?
Potentially, by designing structurally dissimilar compounds that do not fall within the claim scope, or developing alternative therapeutic pathways.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Full-Text and Image Database (PatFT). USPTO.

[2] Patent landscape reports and scientific literature on chemical classes related to the '879 patent.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) PatentScope.

[4] Prior art references cited within the patent prosecution history.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,347,879

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Haleon Us Holdings FLONASE SENSIMIST ALLERGY RELIEF fluticasone furoate SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 022051-002 Aug 2, 2016 OTC Yes Yes 8,347,879 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,347,879

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0210605.2May 09, 2002
United Kingdom0217798.8Aug 01, 2002
United Kingdom0219462.9Aug 21, 2002
PCT Information
PCT FiledMay 07, 2003PCT Application Number:PCT/EP03/04858
PCT Publication Date:November 20, 2003PCT Publication Number: WO03/095007

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.