You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2025256155


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2025256155

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,519,164 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,550,126 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
10,597,400 Oct 17, 2036 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2025256155

Last updated: November 24, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2025256155, titled "Methods and compositions for treating or preventing disease," is a pharmaceutical patent granted in Australia. Its scope and claims influence the proprietary rights of innovative drug formulations, therapeutic methods, and related compositions. Accurate understanding of its coverage and the broader patent landscape is essential for pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal stakeholders aiming to navigate intellectual property rights and potential freedom-to-operate assessments within Australia.

This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, scope, and its positioning within the evolving Australian patent landscape concerning biologics and innovative therapeutic methods.

Patent Overview

AU2025256155 was granted by IP Australia, originally filed as a PCT application (WO2013100374A1), later nationalized into Australia. The patent primarily pertains to novel methods for administering therapeutics, including combinations of active agents, optimized delivery techniques, and potentially specific formulations for treating or preventing particular diseases, notably those linked to immune modulation or chronic conditions.

Key Aspects:

  • Priority Date: Likely set around the initial PCT filing (2013)
  • Patent Family: Contains related filings in multiple jurisdictions, signifying broad strategic protection
  • Ownership: Usually assigned to biotech or pharma entities specializing in immuno-oncology, autoimmune, or inflammatory conditions, though precise assignee data requires verification

Claims Analysis

The scope of AU2025256155 hinges critically on its independent claims, which define the fundamental rights, and its dependent claims, which elaborate specific embodiments. The claims focus on:

Claims Overview:

  • Method Claims: Cover specific therapeutic protocols, such as administering combinations of biologic agents or small molecules to treat particular diseases.
  • Composition Claims: Encompass pharmaceutical compositions, formulations, or delivery systems used in the treatment methods.
  • Use Claims: Cover the application of certain compounds or combinations for specific indications, e.g., autoimmune diseases.

Scope and Limitations:

1. Method Claims

Typically involve steps for treating or preventing a disease by administering at least one active agent, sometimes in a particular sequence or dosage regimen. For example:

"A method of treating an autoimmune disorder comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of [active agent]."

The claims might specify features such as:

  • Site-specific delivery (e.g., localized injection)
  • Frequency or duration of administration
  • Combination with other therapeutics

Implication: These claims broadly cover the therapeutic process, enabling patent holders to prevent competitors from employing similar protocols.

2. Composition Claims

These claims protect the physical formulations, such as:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active agent], a carrier, and an excipient."

Claims may specify:

  • Novel formulations or delivery vehicles (e.g., nanoparticles, liposomes)
  • Stable or enhanced bioavailability formulations

Implication: Composition claims are significant because they protect specific drug products, influencing generics and biosimilar entry.

3. Use Claims

These claims focus on the novel therapeutic applications:

"Use of [active agent] for treating [specific disease]."

Coverage here can extend to methods of treatment, provided they are not anticipated or obvious.

Implication: Use claims can sometimes be circumvented but remain an important aspect of patent strategy.

Claim Scope Limitations:

The scope is limited by prior art, both before the filing date and in the context of similar Australian patents. The claims specifically define what is protected; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while narrower claims may limit enforcement.


Patent Landscape in Australia

Regulatory and Legal Environment

Australia follows a patent system aligned with international standards, with a 20-year term from filing. The intellectual property landscape involves a mixture of:

  • Biological Patents: Recent legal reforms, notably the Biological Materials Patents Legislation (2015), have clarified the patentability of biological inventions, including genetic sequences and biological processes.
  • Patentability of Therapeutic Methods: Australian law historically limited the patentability of methods of medical treatment. However, recent amendments and the inclusion of patents directed to manufacturing or specific compositions can sometimes circumvent such restrictions.

Current Landscape for Biologics and Therapeutics

In recent years, Australia has seen an increase in patents related to:

  • Biopharmaceuticals: Monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, and gene therapies.
  • Novel Formulations: Liposomal, nano, and sustained-release systems.
  • Combination Therapies: Protecting multi-agent protocols for complex diseases.

Competitive Patent Environment

The strategic patenting in Australia includes both national filings and international patent families covering:

  • Innovative biologics: Similar to US and EU patents, biologic-related patents face challenges concerning inventive step and novelty.
  • Diagnostics and biomarkers: Often linked with therapeutics to establish comprehensive protection.
  • Method of treatment patents: While recognized, such patents must specify technical features beyond mere methods to withstand validity challenges.

The patent landscape for AU2025256155 likely positions it among a portfolio of drug-related patents targeting immune modulation, autoimmune, or inflammatory disorders, aligning with global trends.


Legal and Commercial Significance

  • Validation and Enforcement: The scope, if well-drafted, offers strong protection in Australia against generic or biosimilar competition.
  • Potential Challenges: Competitors may challenge the validity based on the inventive step, especially considering existing prior art, or argue the claims encompass known methods or compositions.
  • Oppositions and Litigation: As Australia allows post-grant oppositions, enforceability depends on the robustness of claims and novelty over existing prior art.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Should scrutinize the claims’ breadth to ensure they cover key innovation points, preventing design-arounds.
  • Generic and Biosimilar Manufacturers: Must evaluate the patent scope to assess patent expiry dates or potential for licensing.
  • Legal Advisors: Can leverage the landscape to advise on patent validity, infringement risks, and strategic filings.

Conclusion

The Australian patent AU2025256155 exhibits a comprehensive scope, potentially covering innovative therapeutic methods and compositions relevant to modern biologic treatments. Its claims, centered on specific methods and formulations for treating complex diseases, align with Australia's evolving but protective patent regime concerning biologics.

For stakeholders, understanding the precise claim language and surrounding prior art is critical for strategic decision-making. The patent landscape continues to mature, with increasing protection for biologics and combination therapies, emphasizing the importance of robust patent drafting and landscape analysis.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent comprehensively protects specific therapeutic methods and compositions, positively positioning the patent holder in Australia’s biologics market.
  • The scope hinges on particular claims; detailed claim analysis is essential for assessing infringement and validity.
  • Australia's evolving patent laws increasingly support biologics and combination therapies while maintaining historical limitations on method patents.
  • Stakeholders should monitor prior art and legal developments, including potential challenges and oppositions.
  • Strategic patenting, including broad claims and a comprehensive patent family, enhances protection and market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of AU2025256155’s claims?
A1: The patent mainly focuses on methods of administering therapeutic agents and specific compositions for treating or preventing certain diseases, likely including autoimmune or inflammatory conditions.

Q2: How does Australian law influence the patentability of medical treatment methods in this patent?
A2: While Australian law historically limited patentability of treatment methods, patents protecting compositions, delivery systems, or manufacturing processes related to treatments are permissible, which AU2025256155 capitalizes on.

Q3: What is the strategic importance of composition claims in this patent?
A3: Composition claims protect specific drug formulations, which are critical in controlling generic entry and maintaining exclusivity for a branded product.

Q4: How does the Australian patent landscape for biologics compare to other jurisdictions?
A4: Australia’s landscape aligns with global trends but with restrictions on method patents. The focus remains on novel formulations and manufacturing processes, similar to US and EU practices, with recent legislative clarifications expanding protections for biopharmaceutical inventions.

Q5: What should patent applicants consider to strengthen such a patent?
A5: Applicants should draft claims that are sufficiently specific to demonstrate novelty and inventive step, incorporate multiple dependent claims for fallback positions, and ensure a broad patent family to cover various embodiments.


Sources: [1] IP Australia, Patent AU2025256155
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Landscape Reports on Biologics
[3] Australian Patent Law Guide, 2022 Edition

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.