You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2023282272


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2023282272

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,421,729 Apr 1, 2035 United Therap TYVASO DPI treprostinil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2023282272

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

The patent AU2023282272 encapsulates a novel invention associated with a specific therapeutic or biochemical modality. Its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape are critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and research institutions, aiming to understand its competitive and innovative stature. This analysis systematically evaluates the patent’s scope and claims, examines the relevant patent landscape, and discusses strategic implications within Australia's intellectual property framework and global pharmaceutical patenting trends.


Scope and Claims of AU2023282272

General Overview

The Australian Patent AU2023282272 appears as a utility patent application, likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound, a unique formulation, or a method of use and synthesis. These patents often contain multiple claims—conceptually categorized as independent and dependent claims—that collectively define the protection boundary for the invention. An accurate interpretation of the scope hinges on dissecting these claims.

Claims Analysis

While the specific claim set is not provided verbatim in this discussion, typical patent claims in the pharmaceutical field follow established conventions. Generally, they delineate:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest scope, establishing the core inventive concept, e.g., a specific compound or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding particular features, dosage forms, or specific use cases.

Key Interests typically reside in:

  • Compound Claims: If the patent claims a novel chemical entity, the scope may encompass the compound’s chemical structure, stereochemistry, and derivatives. The breadth depends on whether the claims cover the compound broadly or are restricted by specific substituents or stereochemistry.

  • Method of Use Claims: These specify medical indications, treatment regimens, or administration routes, often providing secondary layers of protection.

  • Formulation Claims: These protect specific delivery forms—like sustained-release or injectable formulations—if relevant.

  • Process Claims: If applicable, they define synthesis or manufacturing steps, securing intellectual property over production methods.

Scope Considerations

  • Breadth: The scope is determined by the structural diversity covered—whether the claims encompass analogs, salts, or prodrugs.

  • Specificity: Precise chemical claims narrow the scope but strengthen enforceability; overly broad claims risk invalidation for lack of inventive step or undue breadth.

  • Use Claims: The scope may extend to specific therapeutic methods, e.g., treatment of particular diseases such as cancer or autoimmune disorders, increasing the patent’s strategic value.

Legal Standards and Limitations

Australian patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and utility. The claims must delineate something new and non-obvious over prior art. The patent’s breadth is consequently limited to what is genuinely inventive and supported by the disclosure.


Patent Landscape in Australia and Global Context

Australian Patent Environment

Australia offers a robust patent system aligned with international standards, including compliance with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The country’s examination procedures focus heavily on novelty and inventive step, with a specific emphasis on the detailed disclosure requirement.

Key features relevant to this patent include:

  • Data Exclusivity: Australia grants a period of data exclusivity, impacting generic entry.

  • Patent Term: Usually 20 years from the filing date, adaptable depending on supplementary protections or patent term adjustments.

  • Research and Development Activity: Australia's biotech and pharma sectors are active, leading to an increasing patenting of innovative drugs.

Global Patent Landscape for Similar Innovations

The patent landscape generally features filings in major jurisdictions such as the US, EU, China, and Japan. Patent families related to the same core compound or therapeutic method often involve:

  • Priority Documents & Patent Families: AU2023282272 may belong to an international patent family, sharing priority claims with WO (PCT) applications.

  • Patent Litigation & Oppositions: Globally, patent holders face challenges concerning claim validity, especially for broadly worded claims.

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents can hinder generic entry, especially for blockbuster drugs mimicking or improving upon the patented invention.

  • Patent Slides & Cumulative Coverage: It's common for patentees to expand claims via continuations or divisional applications to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Comparative Patent Coverage

  • Chemical Structure Patents: Similar compounds are likely patented elsewhere, targeting different therapeutic indications, forming a dense art landscape.

  • Method of Treatment Patents: These often extend rights beyond compounds, covering therapeutic protocols.

  • Formulation Patents: Covering innovative delivery systems to improve drug efficacy or stability.

This complex landscape often necessitates detailed freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization or licensing.


Strategic and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Strength: The scope's breadth directly influences enforceability and market exclusivity. Narrow claims could allow competition, whereas broad claims might risk invalidation.

  • Licensing & Partnerships: Strategic licensing agreements may hinge on the patent's territorial reach and the scope of claims.

  • Infringement & Validity Challenges: The patent landscape complexity increases the risk of asserting or defending patent rights, making due diligence essential.

  • Innovation Continuum: Given rapid advances in biotech, continuous innovation or additional patents (e.g., for formulations or methods) augment protection.


Conclusion

Patent AU2023282272 appears to strategically secure rights over a novel feature within the pharmaceutical domain, potentially covering a chemical entity, methods of use, or formulations. Its scope is defined by the claims' breadth, impacting enforceability and competitive positioning. The Australian patent landscape is active in this domain, with a dense network of family filings and overlapping rights globally. Effective management requires diligent monitoring and strategic patent drafting to maintain a robust exclusivity window.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting Matters: The breadth of AU2023282272’s claims significantly influences market exclusivity duration and the scope of enforcement.

  • Patent Landscape Complexity: This patent likely exists within a dense international patent environment, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • Strategic Portfolio Positioning: Combining broad core patents with narrower secondary claims maximizes protection and mitigates validity risks.

  • Local and Global Considerations: Australian rights must be aligned within a broader international patent strategy for maximum commercial benefit.

  • Ongoing Innovation is Essential: Continuous R&D is necessary to extend patent coverage and stay ahead of potential challenges.


FAQs

Q1: How does AU2023282272 differ from other patents in the same therapeutic area?
A: Its distinctiveness depends on the specific chemical structure, method of use, or formulation it claims. Comparing claim language and scope with prior art helps define its uniqueness.

Q2: Can broad chemical claims be invalidated for patentability reasons?
A: Yes. Overly broad claims that lack novelty or inventive step are susceptible to invalidation under Australian law and abroad.

Q3: What strategies can improve the enforceability of this patent?
A: Narrowing claims to focus on specific compounds or methods, ensuring thorough support in the disclosure, and continuous patent family expansion.

Q4: How does the Australian patent system compare with other jurisdictions for biotech patents?
A: Australia adopts similar standards to the US and EU for novelty and inventive step but emphasizes detailed disclosure and utility. Its patent term and data exclusivity policies are aligned with international norms.

Q5: What are the key considerations for licensing or commercialization based on this patent?
A: Evaluating territorial coverage, claim scope, potential infringement risks, and strategic fit within a broad IP portfolio.


References
[1] Australian Patent Database, AU2023282272.
[2] IP Australia, Guide to Patent Examination.
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, Biotech & Pharmaceutical Sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.