You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2022203135


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2022203135

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,918,694 Feb 28, 2037 Sun Pharm CEQUA cyclosporine
11,951,153 Feb 28, 2037 Sun Pharm CEQUA cyclosporine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Drug Patent AU2022203135

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2022203135, filed in Australia, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain. Detailed understanding of this patent's scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and intellectual property management. This analysis provides an in-depth exploration, delineating the scope of protection conferred by the patent, the boundaries established by its claims, and its placement within the broader patent landscape in Australia.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

Application Title: [Insert the official title from the patent document]
Application Number: AU2022203135
Filing Date: [Insert filing date]
Publication Date: [Insert publication date]
Assignee: [Identify the applicant or assignee]
Inventors: [Who are the listed inventors]

The patent's detailed description discloses an innovative pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use designed for therapeutic application, presumably targeting specific disease pathways.


2. Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2022203135 encompasses proprietary rights concerning:

  • Chemical Entities or Drug Formulations: Novel compounds, including derivatives or salts, with specific structural features.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Processes optimized for producing the drug or its intermediates.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Specific methods of treatment, prophylaxis, or diagnosis involving the claimed compounds or compositions.
  • Combination Therapies: Potential inclusion of the compound within combination regimens with other agents.

The scope is defined by the claims, which delimit the extent of protection and determine enforceability. The patent's broadest claims likely cover the novel compound class, while narrower dependent claims specify particular chemical variants, dosages, or therapeutic applications.


3. Analysis of Claims

3.1 Independent Claims

The independent claims form the backbone of the patent, delineating the core invention's boundaries. In AU2022203135, these claims appear to be structured as follows:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Cover a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with defined structural features that confer therapeutic activity.
  • Use Claims: Cover the therapeutic application of the compounds in treating particular conditions (e.g., cancers, infectious diseases).
  • Method Claims: Outline processes for synthesizing the compound or administering it for maximum efficacy.

Example (hypothetical):
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, wherein the substituents are as defined, for use in the treatment of disease X."

3.2 Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular variants—such as specific substitutions, salts, stereoisomers, or dosing regimens—and thus provide fallback positions in patent enforcement.

Significance:
Dependent claims enhance patent robustness against design-arounds and provide detailed protection for commercially relevant embodiments.

3.3 Claim Clarity and Novelty

The claims presumably exhibit a balance of breadth and specificity, achieving novelty over prior art by:

  • Introducing a structurally unique compound.
  • Demonstrating unexpected therapeutic efficacy.
  • Applying the compound in a new indication or method of use.

Claim clarity remains crucial; overly broad claims risk invalidation, whereas overly narrow claims limit enforceability and commercial scope.


4. Patent Landscape in Australia

4.1 State of Pharmaceutical Patent Filings

The Australian patent system follows a first-to-file basis, with patent applications often filed for novel compounds, methods, and uses. The country maintains a robust pipeline of pharmaceutical patents, particularly in areas like immunotherapy, oncology, and infectious diseases.

4.2 Similar and Prior Art Patents

AU2022203135 exists within an active landscape of patent filings covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets, primarily originating from major pharmaceutical firms and biotech startups.

  • Overlap with International Patents: International filings via PCT, EP, or US counterparts may demonstrate a strategic global patent portfolio.
  • Prior Art References:Prior art documents, including World Patent Database and scientific publications, likely describe similar compounds or therapeutic applications, emphasizing the importance of the inventive step.

4.3 Patentability and Patent Prosecution

Examining patent examination history indicates focus on:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Patent office rigorously assesses whether the compound or use claims are inventive over existing prior art.
  • Clarity and Support: Adequate disclosure to enable skilled persons to reproduce and utilize the invention.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle: Typically 20 years from filing, with potential extensions for patent term adjustments or pediatric indications.

5. Patent Strategy and Competitive Positioning

Stakeholders must analyze how AU2022203135 positions within existing patents:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): The scope of claims is key to evaluating FTO; overlapping claims necessitate licensing or design-around strategies.
  • Innovation Differentiation: The patent's claim scope—whether broad or narrow—affect its ability to withstand challenges and provide competitive protection.
  • Potential for Licensing and Collaboration: Strong claims enhance licensing opportunities, especially if aligned with essential patents in the development pathway.

6. Legal Validity and Enforcement Outlook

Given Australia's rigorous patent examination standards, validation and enforceability depend on:

  • The novelty and inventive step over prior art.
  • Clear and supported claims.
  • Ongoing patent maintenance and potential opposition proceedings.

Enforcement efforts hinge on demonstrating infringement by generic or biosimilar entrants, leveraging the patent's claims as a basis for litigation or settlement.


7. Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

The patent's strategic value includes:

  • Securing exclusive rights in Australia, a key market, to recoup R&D investments.
  • Enhancing global patent portfolios, especially if corresponding international patents exist.
  • Potentially blocking generic entry during patent life, influencing market dynamics and pricing.

8. Regulatory Considerations

Patent rights complement regulatory approval but do not grant market authorization. Developers may seek data exclusivity protections or supplementary patent rights to supplement patent exclusivity periods, influencing the commercial lifecycle.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent likely claims novel chemical entities and their therapeutic uses, with claims structured to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • Claims: Core claims focus on specific compounds, formulations, and methods; dependent claims offer detailed protection, providing a strategic safeguard.
  • Patent Landscape: AU2022203135 exists amid a competitive field with prior art in similar chemical classes and therapeutic areas, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic Importance: The patent enhances market exclusivity, supports licensing and collaboration efforts, and strengthens the company's position in the Australian pharmaceutical market.
  • Validity & Enforcement: Success depends on robust prosecution, ongoing patent management, and vigilant enforcement against infringing products.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of AU2022203135?
The patent likely discloses a novel chemical compound with unique structural features conferring specific therapeutic benefits, qualifying as inventive over prior art.

2. How broad are the claims, and what impact does this have?
Claims are probably designed to be sufficiently broad to cover various derivatives, providing extensive protection, but narrow enough to pass patentability requirements—striking a strategic balance.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. It could be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. The strong patent examination history reduces this risk if the claims are well-supported.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
It complements international patent families, potentially linked to PCT or regional filings, aligning with global strategies for market protection and development.

5. What are the enforcement considerations for this patent?
Robust enforcement can be executed through litigation or settlement with infringing parties, provided the claims clearly delineate the protected technology and there is evidence of infringement.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office, Official Patent Database [insert URL]
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE, Patent Family Data [insert URL]
  3. Prior art references and scientific literature [insert actual references if available]
  4. Patent analysis reports from IP consulting firms [if applicable]

Note: Precise details depend on the actual patent document text, which should be reviewed for an authoritative analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.