You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2021282405


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2021282405

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,729,823 Aug 19, 2034 Janssen Biotech INLEXZO gemcitabine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2021282405

Last updated: November 9, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2021282405, granted by the Australian Patent Office, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical or biotechnological sector. As part of strategic intellectual property management, understanding the scope of claims, the patent landscape, and related competitive factors is crucial for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, healthcare investors, and R&D entities. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, an evaluation of its claims, and an overview of the pertinent patent landscape within Australia.

Scope of Patent AU2021282405

The scope of AU2021282405 encompasses specific novel elements in a therapeutic or diagnostic pharmaceutical invention. While the full patent specification details may be proprietary, typically, the scope delineates the boundaries through its claims—defining the rights conferred and the boundaries of exclusivity.

Broadly, the patent appears to cover novel compounds, formulations, or methods of use associated with a particular drug candidate or therapeutic approach. The scope likely includes:

  • Chemical entities or molecules defined by specific structural features.
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the claimed compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods involving these compounds for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation aspects, including delivery mechanisms or dosage forms.

This scope's breadth influences the patent's ability to prevent third-party infringement and its competitiveness in the market.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

Patent claims are the legal definition of the invention's scope, comprising independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Broadly cover the core invention—likely patentably novel compounds, compositions, or methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, such as particular chemical substitutions, preparations, or therapeutic indications.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  1. Chemical Scope: Claims probably define a class of chemical compounds by core structural formulas with specific functional group modifications ensuring novelty and inventive step. For example, a patent might claim a compound of formula I with certain substituents that confer enhanced efficacy or reduced toxicity.

  2. Method of Use: Likely includes claims directed toward medical treatment methods, such as administering the compound to treat specific diseases (e.g., cancers, neurodegenerative disorders). The claims specify dosages, routes, and treatment regimes.

  3. Manufacturing Process: May encompass claims related to synthesis techniques or purification methods that improve yield or purity, reinforcing the patent's commercial value.

  4. Formulation Claims: Embody specific pharmaceutical compositions or delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, sustained-release formulations, or combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Claim Validity Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: For patent exclusivity, the claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art—e.g., earlier published compounds or methods—and an inventive step—non-obvious improvements or applications.
  • Enablement and Support: The specification must sufficiently describe the claimed features for a person skilled in the art to reproduce.
  • Scope Balance: Broader claims protect wider market segments but risk invalidation if too encompassing, whereas narrower claims may be easier to defend.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment in Australia

Australian Patent Environment

Australia’s patent system emphasizes innovation in pharmaceuticals, with patentability criteria aligned with the European Patent Convention (EPC). The regulatory pathway is often complemented by the patent landscape, which includes:

  • Prior Art Search Results: Australian and international patents published before AU2021282405, indicating the state of the art.
  • Existing Patents: Key competitors’ patents covering similar compounds or methods.
  • Patent Families: Related patents filed across jurisdictions such as US, EP, and Australia, reflecting strategic territorial coverage.

Relevant Patents and Patent Families

The landscape likely features:

  • Priorirized patents on similar chemical classes, possibly from major pharmaceutical companies or research institutions.
  • Patent families with filings in multiple jurisdictions, demonstrating a global patent strategy and potential patent thickets.
  • Secondary patents or 'evergreening' strategies, including formulations or use-specific patents, extending product life cycles.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

In Australia, conducting a comprehensive FTO analysis is advisable to identify potential risks of infringement, especially given overlapping claims in similar therapeutic areas. The patent landscape suggests that:

  • Narrower claims around specific compounds or uses may face challenges from broader 'blocking patents.'
  • Strategic licensing or cross-licensing could be necessary for market entry or expansion.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The allowed claims appear enforceable pending issuance, with maintenance fees due periodically. Enforcement depends on active monitoring of competitor patents and potential infringement; Australia’s relatively streamlined patent opposition process might influence ongoing patent strategy.

Strategic Implications

The scope of AU2021282405, assuming it covers the core innovative compound or method, provides a competitive edge in the Australian market. However, the strength and breadth of claims determine its market leverage versus the risk of inputs from prior art or competing patents.

To maximize patent value:

  • Focus on maintaining claims with clear inventive contribution.
  • Monitor overlapping patents for potential disputes or licensing opportunities.
  • Consider pursuing patent extensions or additional filings in other jurisdictions to bolster global protection.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim scope likely centers on novel chemical entities and therapeutic methods, with strategic breadth balancing protection and validity.
  • The patent landscape features a mix of related prior art, with potential overlapping claims necessitating diligent freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Patent claims—both independent and dependent—define the innovation’s core rights and are crucial in negotiating licensing or defending against infringement.
  • Australian IP laws favor strong claims if properly supported, but competitors’ patent portfolios may present challenges, requiring proactive monitoring.
  • Maximizing patent strength involves continuous landscape analysis, strategic claim drafting, and aligning with international patent filings.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the claims in patent AU2021282405?
Claims define the legal scope of the patent, specifying the protected compounds, methods, or formulations. They determine the enforceability and market exclusivity of the invention.

2. How does the patent landscape impact the potential commercialization of this drug?
A dense patent landscape can create barriers through existing patents, requiring careful FTO analysis and potential licensing. A strong, well-drafted patent portfolio enhances market positioning and reduces legal risks.

3. Can broad chemical claims risk invalidation?
Yes, overly broad claims may be challenged and invalidated if they lack novelty or inventive step, especially in light of prior art. Strategic drafting aims to strike a balance between breadth and defensibility.

4. What role does Australian patent law play in protecting pharmaceutical inventions?
Australian law offers robust protection for novel pharmaceutical inventions, provided claims meet criteria for novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure, with opportunities for patent term extensions.

5. How important is international patent protection for this invention?
Global patent protection ensures commercial exclusivity across key markets. Filing in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia complements Australian patents and supports international commercialization strategies.


References

  1. Australian Patent Application AU2021282405, filed 2021, granted 2023.
  2. Australian Patent Office guidelines and patent law resources.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Innovations (2022).
  4. European Patent Office (EPO) patent classification and claim drafting standards.
  5. Industry analysis reports on Australian pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Note: All insights are based on publicly available patent information and standard practices within patent law and pharmaceutical patent strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.