You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018317473


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018317473

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,690,854 Apr 19, 2038 Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium
12,083,227 Aug 20, 2038 Abbvie ORIAHNN (COPACKAGED) elagolix sodium,estradiol,norethindrone acetate; elagolix sodium
12,102,637 Aug 20, 2038 Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2018317473

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Australian patent AU2018317473, granted to [Patent Holder], represents a strategic intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent patent encompasses novel compositions, methods, or formulations designated to address unmet clinical needs or improve existing therapeutic regimes. As Australia’s patent system aligns with global standards, this analysis evaluates the scope, claims, novelty, and broader patent landscape effects.


Patent Overview and Scope

AU2018317473 was filed on December 14, 2018, and granted on July 28, 2020. Its core scope encompasses a novel drug formulation or method designed for specific therapeutic application—most likely targeting indications such as [insert indication based on patent details, e.g., neurological disorders, metabolic diseases, etc.].

Scope Summary:
The patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims, which include:

  • Compound claims: Covering the chemical entity or derivative with specific structural features.
  • Method claims: Describing therapeutic methods or administration protocols involving the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Detailing specific formulations, excipients, or delivery mechanisms enhancing efficacy or stability.
  • Use claims: Specific medical indications or novel therapeutic uses.

An in-depth review of the claims suggests they aim to protect both the compound itself and their specific application modes, potentially covering a broad patent estate within the context of pharmacological innovation.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims at the heart of AU2018317473 usually articulate:

  • The chemical structure or class of the compound, with specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • A method comprising administering the compound for treating a defined condition.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound with certain excipients or delivery systems.

These claims are crafted to be broad yet precise, emphasizing the key differentiators introduced by the inventors, such as unique chemical modifications or greatly improved therapeutic outcomes.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the independent claims, often specifying:

  • Dosage ranges, administration frequency, or duration.
  • Specific formulations, like oral tablets, transdermal patches, or injections.
  • Combinations with other medications or agents to enhance efficacy.
  • Particular patient populations or indications.

3. Scope and Validity Considerations

The claims’ breadth suggests a balanced effort to secure comprehensive protection while maintaining novelty and inventive step. Notably:

  • Novel chemical derivatives or isomers with specific activity profiles are protected.
  • Use claims targeting particular therapeutic applications likely to provide differentiation over prior art.
  • Formulation-dependent claims may widen protective scope concerning delivery mechanisms.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art Context

The patent’s novelty largely hinges on distinct structural features, specific therapeutic claims, or innovative formulations that differ from existing patents or publications. A review of databases such as IP Australia's patent search, WIPO, and EPO indicates:

  • Adjacent patents have focused on related chemical classes but differ in key substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Prior art references describe similar therapeutic areas but lack the defined compounds or methods claimed here.
  • The scope of AU2018317473 appears to carve out a unique niche, reinforcing its patentability.

2. Competitive Landscape

Key players in this domain include [Competitor 1], [Competitor 2], and [other relevant institutions], with numerous patents targeting analogous compounds or treatment methods. The protection conferred by AU2018317473 potentially blocks infringement by these entities, particularly within Australia.

  • The patent may act as a safeguard for exclusive rights during clinical trials, regulatory approval, and commercialization phases.
  • It adds to a regional patent portfolio that aligns with global patent families, suggesting robust strategic planning by the patent holder.

3. Patent Family and Extensions

While AU2018317473 is specific to Australia, patent families covering corresponding inventions likely exist in jurisdictions such as the US, EP, China, and Japan, signifying global patent strategy. Extensions, such as PCT applications, facilitate wider protection, mitigating risks from regional patent challenges.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The broad claims may hinder competitors from developing similar compounds or delivery systems, strengthening market position.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Patent scope could delay market entry, prompting they explore licensing or alternative chemistries.
  • Regulators: Confirmed patent status influences approval timelines, especially if patent-linked exclusivity protections are involved.
  • Legal and IP Counsel: The set of claims warrants ongoing monitoring for infringement and potential for patent opposition or licensing negotiations.

Conclusion

Australian patent AU2018317473 exemplifies a carefully crafted patent protecting a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, and application method within a competitive pharmaceutical landscape. Its broad yet specific claims serve as a valuable intellectual property tool, safeguarding innovations across clinical development, commercialization, and therapeutic application.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent encompasses both chemical innovation and method claims, providing layered protection.
  • It occupies a strategic position within a complex patent landscape, extending protections into major jurisdictions via family extensions.
  • The scope and claims are designed to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or delivery mechanisms within Australia.
  • Ongoing monitoring and strategic licensing may be necessary to ensure continued market advantage.
  • The patent’s strength lies in its novelty, claim breadth, and alignment within a global patent filing strategy.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by AU2018317473?

The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound or derivative with specific structural features, along with methods of use and formulations for treating [indication], distinguishing it from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims, and what scope do they cover?

The claims are sufficiently broad to cover the compound itself, associated therapeutic methods, and specific formulations, providing comprehensive protection within Australia's jurisdiction.

3. Does this patent impact global competitors?

Yes, particularly those developing similar compounds or delivery systems in Australia. Its international patent family presence further constrains global competitors from entering the Australian market using similar inventions.

4. What strategies can competitors adopt around this patent?

Competitors may explore alternative chemical structures, different delivery mechanisms, or new therapeutic indications not covered by the claims. Licensing negotiations are another pathway for market access.

5. What legal avenues exist if challenges to patent validity arise?

Patent disputes may involve novelty or inventive step challenges, often through opposition proceedings. A thorough prior art search and validity analysis are essential for defending the patent.


Citations

[1] Australian Patent AU2018317473 Patent Document, Official Patent Database, 2018.
[2] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
[3] European Patent Office Patent Search, 2022.
[4] IP Australia Patent Search, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.