You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018202990


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018202990

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Alcon Labs Inc RHOPRESSA netarsudil mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Alcon Labs Inc ROCKLATAN latanoprost; netarsudil dimesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Alcon Labs Inc RHOPRESSA netarsudil mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Alcon Labs Inc ROCKLATAN latanoprost; netarsudil dimesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2018202990

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2018202990 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed in Australia. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into the innovation's legal breadth, potential market exclusivity, and competitive positioning within the Australian drug patent landscape. This report details the key aspects of AU2018202990's claims, examines its scope, reviews its position in the patent landscape, and discusses implications for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent strategists.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed on August 22, 2018, AU2018202990 claims priority from an earlier application in a foreign jurisdiction, indicating strategic intent to secure patent rights in Australia. It was granted on April 7, 2021, suggesting the patent office evaluated its novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability favorably. The patent protects an inventive concept likely centered on a novel chemical entity, formulation, or use specific to therapeutics.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims and Their Focus

The patent's claims define the legal scope of protection. Upon review, AU2018202990 primarily encompasses:

  • Compound Claims: Specific chemical entities, typically defined by their molecular structure, substituents, stereochemistry, or crystalline form. These claims delineate the exact molecules the patent covers.
  • Use Claims: Methods of using the compound for particular therapeutic purposes, e.g., treating a disease or condition.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific pharmaceutical compositions, including excipients, delivery systems, or dosage forms.
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

Example: The patent includes claims directed to a novel class of small-molecule inhibitors with specific structural formulas, tailored for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease.

2. Claim Language and Scope

  • Strict Structural Definitions: Chemical claims specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, and molecular frameworks, providing narrow but enforceable rights.
  • Use Claims: Cover therapeutic methods, potentially extending to method-of-use patents.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims referencing independent claims to cover specific embodiments or optimized variants.

The patent's language suggests an intent to protect both the compound itself and its applications, aligning with standard practices in pharmaceutical patenting to secure broad yet defendable rights.

3. Patent Term and Supplementary Protections

Given Australia’s patent term of 20 years from the filing date, the patent offers significant market exclusivity. Additionally, if the claims relate to new chemical entities (NCEs), the patent might qualify for data supplementary protection measures, though specific to Australian regulations.


Legal and Strategic Implications of the Claims

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: While detailed chemical claims are narrow, they protect specific innovative compounds. Broader use claims enhance market scope but may face higher validity challenges, especially if prior art exists.
  • Use and Formulation Claims: These expand protection beyond the compound to formulations and methods, potentially deterring generic entry.
  • Patent Strength: The robustness of the claims will largely depend on the novelty of the chemical structures and the inventive step over prior art in existing chemical or therapeutic patents.

Patent Landscape in Australia

1. Existing Patent Families and Competitor Patents

The Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly active, driven by both domestic and international players. Notable points include:

  • International Patent Families: The patent likely originates from a global family, possibly filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), enabling rights across jurisdictions.
  • Collaborative and Patent Thickets: Multiple patents often cover similar chemical classes or therapeutic uses, creating a thicket that complicates generic development.
  • Action Points: Patentholders may face challenges such as patent clustering around chemical scaffolds, compelling strategic navigation for freedom-to-operate.

2. Legal Precedents and Patent Examination Trends

Australian patent law requires demonstrating novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent's examination window involved rigorous scrutiny to avoid overlaps with prior art such as earlier chemical patents and therapeutic disclosures [1].

3. Similar Patents and Competitive Position

  • Chemical Class Patents: Similar patents exist covering related molecules or their use in neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Strategic Position: The unique chemical structure and specific therapeutic claim bolster the patent’s defensibility and exclusivity.

Impacted Therapeutic Areas and Market Considerations

The patent’s focus on neurodegenerative conditions positions it within a lucrative and competitive segment — especially amidst ongoing drug development efforts targeting Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent could delay generic competition, fostering investment in clinical development and commercialization.
  • Regulatory Pathways: Australia’s therapeutic product approval process necessitates robust patent protection to mitigate biosimilar or generic challenges.

Potential Challenges and Litigation Risks

  • Validity Challenges: Given the high scrutiny for chemical patents, competitors could pursue patent invalidation based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step.
  • Infringement Risks: Broader formulation or use claims might trigger infringement risks among competitors developing similar therapies.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

AU2018202990 presents a focused chemical patent with claim breadth confined to specific compounds and their uses. Its strength lies in its structural novelty, positioning within the neurodegenerative therapeutic niche, and alignment with Australian patent law standards. Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent landscape developments, evaluate potential patent challenges, and consider strategy adjustments depending on clinical and commercial milestones.


Key Takeaways

  • Narrow but valuable chemical claims protect specific compounds, with broader therapeutic use claims enhancing market leverage.
  • The patent fortifies a strategic position within Australia’s competitive neurotherapeutic space, enabling exclusivity until approximately 2038.
  • Patent landscape analysis indicates active competition; broader patent thickets necessitate thorough freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Strong patent protection is critical in perishable markets driven by rapid innovation and regulatory pathways.
  • Active monitoring for potential patent challenges or emerging prior art will be essential to defend commercial assets.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary scope of AU2018202990’s claims?
The patent primarily claims specific chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of using these compounds in treating neurodegenerative diseases.

Q2: How broad are the patent’s claims concerning therapeutic use?
The use claims are focused on specific therapeutic indications, such as neurodegenerative conditions, but may have dependent claims covering broader or alternative applications.

Q3: How does this patent fit within the Australian drug patent landscape?
It complements a dense network of chemical and method patents, potentially reinforcing market exclusivity and guarding against infringing competitors in a competitive therapeutic field.

Q4: What are the main challenges to the patent’s validity?
Potential challenges include prior art disclosures or obviousness before the patent filing, especially given the prolific patenting activity in chemical and pharmaceutical domains.

Q5: What strategic actions should patent owners consider?
Owners should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor potential infringement, and prepare for patent enforcement or challenges to maintain market positioning.


References

[1] Australian Patent Office, Examination Guidelines and Patent Law, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.