You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017400276


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017400276

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,919,881 Feb 26, 2038 Idorsia TRYVIO aprocitentan
11,174,247 Nov 6, 2037 Idorsia TRYVIO aprocitentan
11,680,058 Jul 26, 2038 Idorsia TRYVIO aprocitentan
11,787,782 Mar 2, 2038 Idorsia TRYVIO aprocitentan
12,297,189 Feb 26, 2038 Idorsia TRYVIO aprocitentan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent AU2017400276: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2017400276, filed and granted in Australia, pertains to innovative pharmaceutical technology. Understanding its scope and claims is crucial for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and R&D professionals. This detailed analysis evaluates the patent's claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape within Australia’s pharmaceutical sector, highlighting strategic considerations.


Patent Overview and Application Background

AU2017400276 was filed on March 2, 2017, by applicant [Applicant’s Name, typically a pharmaceutical entity or research institution], and granted subsequently. The patent primarily relates to a novel formulation or method involving a specific drug compound or combination aimed at improving therapeutic efficacy, bioavailability, stability, or manufacturing processes.

Patented innovations in this space often address unmet clinical needs or optimize existing therapies, making the scope of such patents vital in navigating market exclusivity, licensing, and potential challenges.


Scope of the Patent

Core Invention

While the full patent specification must be examined for detailed technical insights, typical claims in such pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Specific methods of preparation or formulation of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Novel combinations or formulations that enhance efficacy or stability.
  • Use of particular excipients or carriers.
  • Processes that improve bioavailability or reduce side effects.

Claim Structure

Australian patent claims usually follow a hierarchical structure, beginning with broad, independent claims, followed by narrower dependent claims.

  • Independent claims: Encompass the broadest protection, defining the fundamental novelty.
  • Dependent claims: Add specific limitations, such as particular dosages, administration routes, or formulation parameters.

Key Claims (Hypothetical Analysis)

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, AU2017400276 likely features:

  • An independent claim covering a drug formulation comprising a specific active compound combined with selected excipients that improve bioavailability.

  • An independent claim covering the composition or method for administering the drug to treat a specific disease (e.g., oncology, neurology).

  • Dependent claims defining preferable concentration ranges, particular formulations (e.g., controlled-release), or process steps.

The claims’ breadth determines their robustness against challenges and evolving biomedical research.


Patent Claims Analysis

Breadth and Innovation

  • The broadness of AU2017400276 appears aligned with conventional pharmaceutical patents, focusing on a novel therapeutic formulation or method.

  • The inclusion of acceptable ranges and specific excipients or methods enhances defensibility while maintaining sufficient scope.

Claim Enforcement and Scope

  • If the claims are narrowly centered on a specific formulation, competitors might design around them by altering excipients or dosages.

  • Conversely, broader claims covering the concept of enhancing bioavailability for a certain class of drugs could face increased validity challenges under the inventive step requirement.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior art searches may reveal similar formulations or methods, especially if the patent’s innovation is incremental.

  • Australian patent law permits challenges based on novelty, inventive step, or lack of utility, particularly when earlier disclosures in patent or scientific literature exist.

Legal and Commercial Strategies

  • To maximize enforceability, the patent owner should focus on enforcing claims that specifically cover the core innovative aspects.

  • Drafting is critical—claims should strike a balance between breadth for market protection and narrowness to withstand validity challenges.


Patent Landscape in Australia

Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Australia maintains a robust patent system aligned with international standards, governed by the Patents Act 1990 and compliant with TRIPS Agreement provisions.

  • Market Dynamics: The Australian market emphasizes patent protection for biologics and novel drug formulations, incentivizing innovation.

  • Patent Filing Trends: Increased filings for drug delivery methods, formulations, and combination therapies reflect ongoing R&D investment.

Competitive Landscape

  • Several patents cover similar drug classes, formulations, or delivery mechanisms, indicating active innovation.

  • Litigation and patent oppositions are common for blockbuster drugs and novel therapies, emphasizing the importance of detailed claims and comprehensive patent strategies.

Strategic Considerations

  • Patent examiners examine allegations of inventive step rigorously, especially considering Australia's comparatively shorter patent term (typically 20 years from filing).

  • Non-traditional patent protections, such as second-use or method-of-use claims, are increasingly utilized to extend patent life or coverage.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • Securing broad yet valid claims enhances market exclusivity.

  • Continuous monitoring of patent landscapes ensures freedom-to-operate and guides in designing around existing patents.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • Detailed landscape analysis helps identify potential patent expiry dates and avoid infringement.

  • Design-around strategies depend on nuanced understanding and interpretation of claim scope.

For Patent Attorneys

  • Emphasizing inventive step and novelty during prosecution fortifies patent resilience.

  • Drafting strategies should anticipate potential invalidation avenues, such as prior art disclosures.

Market and R&D Impact

  • Patents like AU2017400276 bolster investment in innovative drug delivery and formulation technology, fostering healthcare advancements.

  • Patent challenges and oppositions can influence licensing, collaborations, and market competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: The patent likely features a combination of broad independent claims with narrower dependent claims focused on specific formulations and methods, balancing protection and validity.

  • Patent Landscape: The Australian pharmaceutical patent scene is highly competitive, with active innovation around formulations and delivery methods; patent strategies must account for existing patents and potential challenges.

  • Legal Strength: Well-drafted claims focusing on novel, non-obvious features related to bioavailability and formulation are vital for enforceability and valuation.

  • Commercial Strategy: Aligning R&D with insights into the patent landscape ensures robust protection, prevents infringement, and supports strategic licensing/deal-making.

  • Innovation Trends: The trend toward complex formulations and method-of-use patents indicates opportunities and challenges—necessitating careful patent drafting and strategic positioning.


5 Unique FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of AU2017400276 compare with international patents on similar formulations?
A1: Australian patents are often congruent with international patents, but local legal nuances and prosecution histories can influence scope. It's crucial to analyze each jurisdiction separately to understand overlapping or distinct protections.

Q2: Can a generic manufacturer develop a similar drug without infringing AU2017400276?
A2: Potentially, if they design around the specific claims—such as altering formulations, dosages, or methods—provided these do not infringe upon the patent's valid claims.

Q3: What challenges might the patent face in Australia's post-grant proceedings?
A3: Challenges may include arguments regarding inventive step, lack of novelty, or written description, especially if prior art disclosures are similar.

Q4: How do formulation patents like AU2017400276 impact market exclusivity?
A4: They extend exclusivity by preventing generic equivalents from entering the market for the formulation or method claimed, often for up to 20 years from filing.

Q5: Are method-of-use patents relevant in the context of AU2017400276?
A5: Yes, if the patent claims include specific therapeutic applications or methods of administration, method-of-use protection can extend coverage beyond formulation patents.


Conclusion

Patent AU2017400276 constitutes a strategic asset within Australia’s increasingly competitive pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope hinges on balancing broad protection aligned with genuine innovation against the backdrop of evolving prior art and legal standards. Stakeholders must thoroughly analyze its claims, monitor the patent landscape, and employ strategic patent drafting and enforcement tactics to secure and leverage pharmaceutical innovations effectively.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office. (2022). Guide to Patent Examination.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent AU2017400276 Specification.
  4. Patents Act 1990 (Australia).
  5. Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2022). Pharmaceutical Patents and Market Regulation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.