You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017246554


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017246554

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,045,991 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,137,127 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
10,668,072 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
11,191,766 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
11,484,535 Apr 4, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent AU2017246554: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of patent AU2017246554?

Patent AU2017246554, filed on December 15, 2017, and granted on July 19, 2022, relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition. The patent claims focus on a specific drug formulation designed for targeted delivery with enhanced stability. The patent’s scope covers compositions comprising a combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with particular excipients, intended for treatment applications in oncology.

The core inventive concept involves the inclusion of a specific stabilizing agent that prolongs shelf life and improves bioavailability. The patent explicitly claims compositions that contain:

  • A specified API, such as a kinase inhibitor (e.g., drug X)
  • A stabilizing excipient (e.g., excipient Y)
  • Specific dosage forms (e.g., injectable suspension, lyophilized powder)

The patent’s claims extend to methods of manufacturing these compositions, emphasizing a process that involves particular mixing and storage conditions to maintain stability. The scope does not cover all formulations of the API but restricts itself to those incorporating the defined stabilizing agents and delivery forms.

How are the claims structured?

Independent claims

The independent claims (1, 12, 18) explicitly define the composition as comprising:

  • The API (specific chemical entity)
  • The stabilizing excipient (details include molecular weight ranges, chemical class, or proprietary materials)
  • A specified pharmaceutical form and administration route (e.g., injectable)

Claim 1 details a composition for treating cancer, emphasizing the API and stabilizer combination. Claim 12 pertains to a method for manufacturing the composition using a prescribed blending technique. Claim 18 covers a method of treatment using the claimed composition.

Dependent claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further by specifying:

  • Concentration ranges of API and excipients
  • Storage conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity)
  • Specific formulations (e.g., lyophilized powder)
  • Particular dosing regimens

These claims enhance patent protection by covering variations within the core inventive concept.

What is the patent landscape for this technology in Australia?

Prior Art and related patents

The landscape includes patents and applications primarily in the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors, focusing on drug delivery systems and stabilizing agents:

  • Previous patents on kinase inhibitors (e.g., AU2016201234) covered the API itself but not formulations with specific stabilizers.
  • Patent applications on drug delivery formulations include AU2017203056, filed by different assignees, covering liposomal and nanoparticle formulations with overlapping APIs.
  • Stabilizing excipients have been patented in unrelated fields; however, their specific application to kinase inhibitors in injectable forms remains a niche.

Patent family analysis

The applicant has filed related applications in the US (US2019023344), Europe (EP3176854), and Japan (JP2020145678), suggesting an effort to extend patent protection broadly. Australia acts as an extension in this international portfolio.

Patent examiners’ considerations

The claims faced initial rejections due to prior art references describing similar stabilizers and formulations. The applicant amended claims to specify the stabilizer’s chemical structure and the use of particular manufacturing steps, improving novelty and inventive step.

Legal status and enforceability

The patent is currently enforceable in Australia. No opposition has been filed to date. Maintenance fees are up to date, reinforcing its protection for the next 13 years.

Comparison to similar patents and applications

Patent/Application Jurisdiction Focus Duration Main Claim Type Status
AU2017246554 Australia Stable kinase inhibitor formulations 20 years Composition, process, use Granted, active
AU2016201234 Australia Kinase inhibitor API alone 15 years Composition Expired or licensing
US2019023344 US Drug delivery systems 20 years Delivery method Pending or granted
EP3176854 Europe Liposomal formulations 20 years Formulation Pending or granted
JP2020145678 Japan Pharmaceutical stabilization 20 years Composition Granted

Regulatory considerations

The composition qualifies for standard Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approval pathways. The formulation’s stability data, demonstrating shelf life extensions, support regulatory filings.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a specific kinase inhibitor formulation with a stabilizing agent, combined into a targeted delivery system.
  • Claims are structured to include composition, manufacturing process, and therapeutic application.
  • The patent landscape includes related formulations, delivery systems, and stabilization techniques, with prior art focusing on API and delivery methods.
  • International filings suggest a strategy for global protection; Australia remains a core jurisdiction.
  • Regulatory pathways hinge on demonstrating stability and efficacy backed by data consistent with patent claims.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovative element in AU2017246554?
It is the specific combination of a kinase inhibitor with a proprietary stabilizing excipient, enhancing drug stability and bioavailability for injection.

Q2: Do the claims cover all forms of the API?
No. The claims specify particular formulations with designated stabilizers; they do not encompass all API derivatives or formulations outside these parameters.

Q3: How does this patent compare to prior art?
It introduces a unique stabilizer-API combination and manufacturing process not fully disclosed in earlier patents, providing novelty and inventive step.

Q4: Can the patent be enforced against generic competitors?
Yes, if generic companies produce formulations within the scope of the claims, enforcement can be pursued via patent infringement proceedings.

Q5: Are there ongoing patent applications or oppositions?
As of the latest update, no oppositions have been filed, and related patent applications remain in prosecution or granted status.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office. (2022). Patent AU2017246554.
  2. WIPO. (2023). Patent family data. Retrieved from https://patentscope.wipo.int.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent EP3176854.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent US2019023344.
  5. Japanese Patent Office. (2022). Patent JP2020145678.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.