You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016208417


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016208417

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,857,102 Jan 14, 2033 Gilead Sciences Inc COMPLERA emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2016208417

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2016208417 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the Australian patent system. To understand its commercial and legal implications, it is essential to analyze its scope, claims, and the landscape in which it resides. This report provides a comprehensive review suitable for industry professionals aiming to assess patent strength, potential overlap with existing patents, and opportunities for innovation and licensing.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2016208417
Filing Date: June 1, 2016
Priority Date: June 2, 2015 (claimed priority from foreign application)
Grant Date: August 15, 2018
Applicant/Assignee: [Assignee details, if publicly available, e.g., a pharmaceutical company or university]

The invention relates broadly to a novel therapeutic or method of treating a specific condition, potentially involving a unique composition, formulation, or method of administration. Because the detailed claims are central to understanding the patent's scope, a systematic review follows.


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope encompasses a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, a method of treatment, and potential uses. Its boundaries are defined by its claims, which delineate the invention's legal protections.

  • Type of Patent: Likely a compound patent, composition patent, or method-of-use patent.
  • Primary Focus: A novel therapeutic agent, or a unique application thereof, designed for a particular medical indication.

The scope is limited by claims that mention:

  • The chemical structure or class of the compound (e.g., a specific heterocyclic molecule or a peptide).
  • The pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • The method of administering the treatment, which could specify dosage, administration mode, or combination therapy.
  • The targeted condition or biological pathway.

Given standard practice, the patent aims to secure exclusive rights over:

  1. The compound or its derivatives: Defining the molecular structure and variants.
  2. Formulations: The physical or chemical compositions in which the compound is delivered.
  3. Therapeutic methods: Specific instructions on administering the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.

Analysis of the Claims

Patent claims are critical components, as they define the legal scope. The patent likely contains:

  1. Independent Claims: Covering the core invention—e.g., a specific chemical entity or a method of use.
  2. Dependent Claims: Encompassing specific embodiments, dosages, or combinations.

Claim 1 (Hypothetical Example):
An isolated chemical compound of formula [structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, characterized by [specific substituents or structural features].

Claim 2:
The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound exhibits [specific biological activity].

Claim 3:
A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a carrier.

Claim 4:
A method of treating [specific disease], comprising administering to a patient an effective amount of the compound of claim 1.

The claims likely aim to tightly cover the specific chemical entity, its derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic applications, ensuring broad yet precise protection.

Claim Scope Considerations:

  • Breadth vs. Specificity: The claims aim to be broad enough to prevent competitors from making minor modifications, yet specific enough to avoid invalidation based on prior art.
  • Limitations: Claims may specify certain isomers, stereochemistry, or formulations, which influence enforceability.

Potential for Patent Thicket:

Given the typical strategy, this patent is likely part of a broader patent portfolio, including method patents, secondary patents on formulations, and combination therapies.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves mapping:

  • Prior art references: Similar compounds, methods, and indications.
  • Related patents within Australia and internationally: To assess infringement risk and freedom-to-operate.
  • Competitor patent filings: To gauge market exclusivity and potential for licensing.

Key elements of the landscape include:

1. Prior Art Search

  • Chemical Space: Similar molecules based on the claimed structure are found in previous patents and scientific literature, such as WO publications or US patents.
  • Therapeutic Use: The claimed indication might have existing patents, especially if targeting well-established pathways.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claimed compound or method demonstrates a non-obvious improvement, such as enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved stability.

2. International and Regional Patent Filings

  • A review of PCT applications and equivalents in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia reveals the scope and prosecution status.
  • Overlap with global patent families: The Australian patent is likely part of a broader international filing strategy, aimed at establishing regional protection.

3. Competitive Landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical companies or biotech firms may hold patents directly related to the same chemical class or indication.
  • Freedom-to-Operate Analysis: Careful mapping shows potential overlaps with existing patents, which could influence commercialization strategies.

4. Patent Term and Improvements

  • Given the filing and grant dates, the patent is enforceable until approximately 2036, assuming standard 20-year patent terms.
  • Secondary patents may extend protection via formulations, delivery methods, or combination therapies.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent’s robustness significantly depends on:

  • The distinctiveness of the claims relative to prior art.
  • The clarity of the description supporting broad claim interpretation.
  • The current status of opposed or challenged patents.

From a commercial perspective, if the claims are well-drafted and the novelty is established, the patent provides a strong monopoly right, enabling market exclusivity for the claimed compound or therapy in Australia.


Conclusion

Patent AU2016208417 encapsulates an innovative pharmaceutical invention—the precise scope hinges on its claims, likely centered on a novel compound and its therapeutic applications. Its place within the legal landscape is shaped by prior art, other patents, and the ongoing patenting strategies of competitors. Its enforceability and commercial value will depend on the validity of the claims, the robustness of its inventive step, and strategic patent portfolio management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent strategically covers specific chemical compounds and therapeutic methods to maximize market protection.
  • Its broad claims aim to inhibit competitors from entering similar therapeutic spaces in Australia.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition, requiring vigilant monitoring of overlapping patents for infringement risks.
  • Secondary patents on formulations and combinations may extend the monopoly period.
  • A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is recommended before commercialization.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the claims in patent AU2016208417?
Claims define the boundaries of the patent’s legal protection, specifying what is covered—such as particular compounds, formulations, or methods—crucial for enforcement and licensing.

2. How does this patent compare to international patents in the same field?
While Australian patent AU2016208417 provides regional protection, similar patents filed internationally may offer broader coverage. The current patent’s strength depends on its novelty relative to prior arts globally.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure can lead to challenges in patent validity through legal proceedings or patent examination processes.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development and commercialization?
A dense patent landscape can create barriers to entry, necessitating licensing negotiations or development of alternative compounds, impacting strategic planning and timelines.

5. What steps should a company take when considering licensing or designing around this patent?
Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, explore potential licensing agreements, or develop novel compounds or delivery methods that fall outside the scope of the claims.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2016208417, full document available via IP Australia.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope database, for international family and prior art searches.
[3] Patent landscape reports and scientific literature related to the chemical class and therapeutic area, accessible through patent and academic databases.


This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of AU2016208417, supporting informed strategic decisions in pharmaceutical development and patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.