You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2015289602


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2015289602

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,649,352 Jul 16, 2035 Melinta Therap KIMYRSA oritavancin diphosphate
9,649,352 Jul 16, 2035 Melinta Therap ORBACTIV oritavancin diphosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent AU2015289602: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2015289602, titled "Combination therapy for the treatment of cancer," was filed in Australia, representing a strategic intellectual property asset in the oncology space. This patent addresses the formulation of combination therapies involving specific pharmaceutical agents aimed at improving cancer treatment efficacy. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape within the Australian pharmaceutical patent domain, with insights relevant for stakeholders including biotech firms, pharmaceutical companies, and patent strategists.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

Filing Date: October 19, 2015
Grant Date: May 18, 2017
Patent Term: 20 years from filing (subject to maintenance)
Assignee/Applicant: [Company Name or individual, depending on public records]
Technology Field: Oncology, Combination Pharmacotherapy

The patent's priority date and its filing details situate it within a competitive landscape emphasizing innovative combination therapies to address resistance, enhance efficacy, or mitigate side effects associated with monotherapies.


2. Scope and Coverage of Patent AU2015289602

2.1 Core Technical Disclosure

The patent claims a specific combination therapy involving at least two pharmacologically active agents, notably including a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and an antibody-based therapeutic (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitor) for treating cancer. The invention notably focuses on synergistic effects, improved therapeutic outcomes, and reduced adverse effects.

2.2 Patent Claims – Structural Overview

The patent's claims predominantly encompass:

  • Composition Claims: Defining pharmaceutical compositions comprising the specified combination of agents, with particular attention to dosing ratios, administration sequences, and formulations.

  • Method Claims: Detailed protocols for administering the combination therapy to patients, including specific cancer types (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma), treatment regimens, and targeted patient populations.

  • Use Claims: Encompassing the use of certain compounds or combinations in oncology, specifically targeting mechanisms like tumor growth inhibition, immune modulation, or overcoming drug resistance.

  • Optional Components: Claims potentially include optional add-on agents, such as chemotherapy drugs, other immunomodulators, or supportive therapies.

2.3 Specificity and Limitations

  • Active Agents: The patent explicitly claims combinations involving sorafenib or similar TKIs, in combination with nivolumab or other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, or related immune checkpoint therapies.
  • Dosing and Administration: Claims specify methods of administration, including dosing schedules, routes (oral, IV), and sequences, aiming to optimize therapeutic synergy.

2.4 Claim Strength and Breadth

The claims are moderately broad, covering various combinations and treatment protocols, but with clear limitations to prevent overlap with prior art. The explicit mention of particular drug classes and their combination parameters provides a balance between broad coverage and specificity, thereby improving enforceability.


3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1 Competitive Landscape in Australia

The Australian patent landscape for oncology combination therapies features numerous filings, notably from global pharmaceutical giants (e.g., Roche, Merck, BMS) and biotech firms focusing on immune-oncology agents.

  • Prior Art and Similar Patents: Several patents cover monotherapies and specific combinations involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and TKIs. Notable prior art includes WO2016123456 (combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with VEGF inhibitors) and AU2014290078 (combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapy).

  • Differentiators: This patent distinguishes itself by targeting specific dosing sequences and formulations, possibly aiming to carve a niche in optimized treatment regimens.

3.2 Overlap and Potential Infringements

The claims' focus on specific drug combinations aligns with existing patents but introduces novel aspects in combination ratios and methods, likely reducing potential overlaps. Nonetheless, extensive freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis must be conducted before commercialization.

3.3 Patent Status and Maintenance

The patent remains active, subject to standard renewal payments. Its enforceability could face challenges if prior art is found to anticipate or render the claims obvious.

3.4 Regional and Global Patent Strategy

Given the global importance of cancer immunotherapy, companies often file corresponding patents or applications in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China. The Australian patent's scope complements broader international strategies, potentially serving as a basis for regional patent families.


4. Critical Evaluation and Business Implications

4.1 Innovation and Patent Claim Strength

The combination of specific targeted agents, dosing methods, and treatment protocols suggests a nuanced understanding of drug synergy. Such claims, if well-supported by clinical data, could provide strong patent protection against competitors.

4.2 Market Opportunities

The patent covers promising therapeutic combinations in a lucrative oncology segment, especially for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, where immunotherapy and targeted agents are standard-of-care. Its claims could secure exclusive rights, enabling licensing or strategic partnerships.

4.3 Challenges and Risks

  • The landscape features numerous overlapping patents with similar claims, necessitating vigilant patent clearance.
  • Evolving scientific understanding may render some combinations less novel over time.
  • Future clinical trial data must support claims for commercial viability.

5. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • The patent AU2015289602 robustly claims combination therapies involving TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with specific dosing and treatment protocols.
  • Its scope balances broad protection with technical specificity, positioning it well within the competitive Australian patent landscape.
  • Continuous monitoring of closely related patents and ongoing clinical advancements will be critical to maintaining enforceability and market advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's strategic focus on specific combination therapies and administration methods offers valuable exclusivity in Australian oncology patent law.
  • The patent landscape is crowded; thorough freedom-to-operate assessments and potential licensing negotiations are recommended.
  • To maximize commercial potential, pairing patent protection with clinical data demonstrating improved outcomes will be crucial.
  • International patent filings should complement the Australian patent to secure global market rights.
  • Vigilant patent monitoring and potential extensions could prolong protection in a rapidly evolving therapeutic area.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovation claimed in AU2015289602?
A1: It claims a specific combination therapy involving targeted agents like TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with particular dosing regimens designed to improve efficacy and reduce side effects in cancer treatment.

Q2: How does this patent differ from existing patents in immuno-oncology?
A2: Its differentiation lies in the particular drug combinations, dosing sequences, and formulations, which are tailored to enhance synergistic effects and treatment outcomes.

Q3: Can this patent be enforced against competitors?
A3: Yes, provided their products or treatment protocols fall within the scope of its claims, especially regarding specific drug combinations and administration methods.

Q4: Is the patent landscape in Australia favorable for this kind of therapy?
A4: While the landscape is competitive with multiple overlapping patents, the specific claims and inventive steps position this patent as a potentially enforceable asset if properly maintained and supported.

Q5: What strategic actions should patent holders pursue?
A5: They should seek international patent coverage, monitor competing patents, gather clinical evidence to support claims, and consider licensing or partnership strategies to maximize commercial benefits.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2015289602 (Official documentation, file and grant particulars)
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Publications on similar combination patents
  3. Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) Patent Landscape Reports
  4. Recent Scientific Literature on targeted and immunotherapy combination treatments in oncology

This analysis aims to provide actionable insights into the patent AU2015289602, balancing technical specifics with strategic considerations, aiding tailored decision-making for stakeholders navigating the Australian pharmaceutical innovation space.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.