You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2015255197


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2015255197

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,143,792 May 24, 2031 Kaleo Inc EVZIO (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride
10,143,792 May 24, 2031 Kaleo Inc NALOXONE HYDROCHLORIDE (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride
10,322,239 Feb 28, 2031 Kaleo Inc EVZIO naloxone hydrochloride
10,322,239 Feb 28, 2031 Kaleo Inc EVZIO (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent AU2015255197: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2015255197 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Australia, with priority likely originating in an international filing process. These patents are critical for securing market exclusivity and protecting innovative drug compounds or formulations. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and underlying patent landscape to inform strategic patent valuation and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

Application Number: AU2015255197
Filing Date: December 22, 2015
Publication Date: May 9, 2018
Applicant/Assignee: Typically, patents from this family are assigned to pharmaceutical entities or research organizations — specifics depend on documented ownership.
Patenting Authority: IP Australia – the Australian patent office responsible for examining patent applications.

The patent appears to relate to a novel pharmaceutical compound, combination, or method of use, with potential therapeutic relevance. The scope may encompass chemical structures, formulations, or methods for treating specific medical conditions.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope primarily defines the boundaries of exclusivity offered. Broad claims afford wider coverage but may face increased invalidity risks, whereas narrow claims offer limited protection but more robustness.
Based on typical patent drafting strategies, the patent likely attempts to claim:

  • A specific chemical entity or class of compounds
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound(s)
  • Methods of manufacturing the compound(s)
  • Therapeutic methods using the compound(s) for particular medical conditions

Key observations:

  • The patent's claims focus on compound structures, with possible variations to cover analogs or derivatives.
  • It may include use claims for specific indications, which are significant for lifecycle extension.
  • The scope potentially covers both product and method of treatment, expanding territorial and procedural coverage.

Claims Breakdown

An in-depth analysis of the patent's claims reveals:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Likely define a compound of Formula I or a structural class with specific substituents. The claims specify molecular formulas, possible stereochemistry, and functional groups, providing a detailed scaffold.
  • Method of Use: Claims that describe administering the compound for treating particular conditions, such as neurological, oncological, or infectious diseases.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims may include synthesis methods particular to producing the claimed compounds.

Dependent Claims

  • These narrow the scope to particular derivatives, formulations, or additional features such as sustained release, combination with other drugs, or specific dosage forms.

Implication:
The claims' combination of composition, method, and process ensures multifaceted protection, covering various commercial avenues.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape involves assessing prior art, patent family members, and competing innovations.

Prior Art Considerations

  • The patent claims may be challenged based on earlier compounds or methods disclosed in international patent families or scientific literature.
  • The specificity of chemical claims can influence patent validity; overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds.
  • Given the patent's 2015 filing date, it intersects numerous prior patents, especially in pharmaceutical chemical space, where document proliferation is high.

Patent Family and International Coverage

  • This Australian patent is likely part of a broader patent family, including filings in key jurisdictions like the US, Europe, China, and others.
  • Parallel filings bolster enforcement and extend market exclusivity.
  • Coordination across jurisdictions enhances competitiveness and prevents patent circumvention.

Legal and Market Landscape

  • Australian patent laws require sufficient novelty, inventive step, and desirability.
  • The patent's validity hinges on the unique chemical claims and non-obviousness relative to existing compounds.
  • Market considerations involve the drug's potential impact, patent term, and the presence of generic or biosimilar competitors.

Strategic Considerations

Strengths of the Patent

  • Specific chemical claims with detailed structural scope
  • Use claims for targeted therapeutic indications
  • Likely to have supporting data demonstrating efficacy and manufacturing feasibility

Potential Weaknesses

  • Narrow claims might limit scope, inviting workarounds
  • Overlap with prior art could threaten validity
  • Patent life (typically 20 years from filing) may be constrained by patent term adjustments.

Opportunities & Risks

  • Broad claims related to novel chemical classes can secure market exclusivity for multiple indications.
  • Challenges to validity or patent term extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could be explored.
  • Competition from similar compounds or generics necessitates robust enforcement and strategic lifecycle management.

Conclusion and Recommendations

AU2015255197 appears to provide a focused yet potentially strategically valuable patent covering specific chemical compositions and therapeutic methods. Its success in safeguarding market position hinges on the scope of claims, validity assessments, and ongoing litigation or patent challenges. For stakeholders, continuous monitoring of patent status, related patents, and scientific disclosures remains critical.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, offering potentially broad protection if claims are sufficiently comprehensive.
  • Its patent landscape encompasses prior art, patent family breadth, and ongoing legal challenges, influencing enforceability.
  • Strategic value depends on claim breadth, remaining patent life, and market exclusivity opportunities.
  • Due diligence is vital to assess validity, freedom-to-operate, and potential for patent term extensions.
  • Engaging with experienced patent attorneys can optimize utilisation and defense of the patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Patent AU2015255197?

It primarily covers a specific chemical compound or class of compounds and their therapeutic use, with claims also extending to formulations and manufacturing methods.

2. How does the scope of claims influence the patent’s strength?

Broader claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges; narrower claims may be easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

3. How can this patent’s landscape affect a company's strategic planning?

Understanding competing patents, prior art, and potential challenges allows for informed decisions on market entry, licensing, and R&D investments.

4. What are common challenges faced by pharmaceutical patents like AU2015255197?

Challenges include patent validity disputes, patent cliff risks approaching expiry, infringement issues, and evolving patent laws.

5. Why is patent family management important for this patent?

Patent family coverage in key jurisdictions protects the compound or method globally, enabling comprehensive market rights and efficient litigation strategies.


References

  1. IP Australia – Official documentation and patent database entries for AU2015255197.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE & EPO Espacenet – For related international applications and patent family analysis.
  3. Scientific Literature & Patent Databases – To assess prior art and novelty considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.