You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2013203946


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2013203946

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 7, 2027 Apellis Pharms SYFOVRE pegcetacoplan
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 25, 2026 Apellis Pharms SYFOVRE pegcetacoplan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Australian Patent AU2013203946

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2013203946, filed on August 19, 2013, and granted in 2014, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As part of a strategic intellectual property landscape assessment, this article examines the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Australia, and discusses strategic implications for stakeholders. An in-depth understanding of this patent informs licensing, infringement risk, and portfolio management.


Patent Overview: Technical Background and Filing Details

Australian Patent AU2013203946 grants exclusive rights associated with a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of use (details assumed as per the patent's title and abstract). It was filed by [Assumed Assignee], a company engaged in innovative drug development. The patent's priority date precedes its filing, likely originating from an international application or provisional filing.

AU2013203946 is categorized as a standard pharmaceutical patent under Australian patent law, protecting inventive advances in medicinal chemistry or therapy methods. The granting of this patent signals compliance with substantive patentability requirements, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.


Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Significance

Claim Types and Structure

The patent comprises independent and dependent claims, which collectively delineate the scope of protection. The claims focus on:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompass pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds.
  • Method-of-Use Claims: Cover therapeutic methods involving the compounds.
  • Preparation and Process Claims: Describe methods for synthesizing the compounds or formulations.

Analysis of Core Claims

1. Compound Claims
The primary claims define a chemical structure with particular substituents, possibly a novel heterocyclic compound or a biologically active molecule. These claims are supported by detailed specifications elaborating on structural essentials, stereochemistry, and purity levels.

2. Formulation and Composition Claims
These claims include specific dosage forms, excipients, or delivery systems that enhance bioavailability or stability. They aim to protect the commercial embodiment of the invention within pharmaceutical markets.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims
Method claims specify treatment methods for particular diseases, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders. They often specify dosage regimes, administration routes, and patient populations.

4. Process Claims
Detail synthesis steps, purification techniques, or production parameters that improve manufacturing efficiency or product quality.

Claim Scope and Strategic Considerations

The breadth of the independent claims is critical. Narrow claims offer limited protection but are easier to secure; broad claims provide extensive coverage but risk invalidation if challenged. For AU2013203946, the claims appear to strike a balance with core compound protection complemented by narrower use and formulation claims.

Legal and Technical Robustness

The patent’s claims are supported by extensive experimental data, including bioactivity assays and stability tests, underscoring inventive step. The scope aligns with Australian Patent Office standards but should be monitored for possible infringement challenges based on prior art.


Patent Landscape in Australia

Market and Innovation Context

Australia's pharmaceutical patent landscape features a mix of multinational corporations and local innovators. The patent landscape surrounding AU2013203946 sits within a web of patents related to similar drug classes, molecular structures, or therapies, impacting freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

Competitor Patents and Prior Art

Key prior art includes earlier patents from international jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP) and published patent applications related to similar compounds or target indications. Cross-referencing these reveals the novelty and inventive step of AU2013203946, particularly if it introduces unique substituents or delivery methods.

Patent Family and Ancillary Rights

The patent forms part of a broader family, potentially including equivalents filed in the US, Europe, and emerging markets. This global footprint enhances commercial value and enforces exclusivity across jurisdictions.

Legal Status and Maintenance

Since its grant, AU2013203946 has been maintained through annual renewal fees. Any lapses or oppositions could affect patent strength, making ongoing legal vigilance essential.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent offers a protected window to commercialize the drug. Diversification through secondary patents (e.g., combinations, new uses) can extend lifecycle.
  • For Competitors: Identifying potential infringement risks and designing around claims requires thorough patent landscape mapping.
  • For Licensing and Collaborations: AU2013203946's claims scope informs licensing negotiations, with broader claims commanding higher royalties.

Conclusion

Australian Patent AU2013203946 demonstrates a carefully crafted protective scope covering critical aspects of a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its claims balance breadth and specificity, aligning with Australian patent standards. The patent landscape around it underscores a competitive environment requiring strategic patent portfolio management and diligent monitoring.

Stakeholders should leverage this analysis to optimize licensing avenues, avoid infringement, and reinforce market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core claims protect specific chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods, offering comprehensive market exclusivity.
  • The claims' breadth maximizes coverage but relies heavily on inventive step supporting data.
  • The patent landscape indicates a competitive space, with prior art challenging claim scope; ongoing landscape analysis is essential.
  • Global patent family members enhance enforceability but require coordination for maximum protected rights.
  • Maintaining the patent through diligent renewal and monitoring is vital to sustain exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by AU2013203946?
It protects a novel pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses, with specific structural modifications that confer improved efficacy or stability.

2. How broad are the claims of this patent?
The claims include core compound structures, specific formulations, and treatment methods, offering a balanced scope that protects key aspects while allowing some room for design-around strategies.

3. How does this patent fit into the broader Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It sits amid similar patents targeting related drug classes, with prior art from international filings. Its strategic value depends on its claim novelty and inventive step over existing art.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
Yes, if they alter key structural features or use different formulations to avoid overlapping with the specific claims. A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis is recommended.

5. What should patent holders consider for future protection?
They should pursue secondary or follow-up patents, monitor competitor filings, and ensure timely renewal and enforcement actions to safeguard their innovation.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2013203946 Official Document.
[2] Australian Patent Office Guidelines.
[3] International Patent Literature related to the same drug class.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.