You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2011276680


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2011276680

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,023,790 Jul 4, 2031 Merck Sharp Dohme NOXAFIL posaconazole
9,358,297 Jun 24, 2031 Merck Sharp Dohme NOXAFIL posaconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2011276680

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2011276680, granted in Australia, seeks to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into its enforceability, technological landscape, and potential impact within the pharmaceutical industry. This report dissects the patent's claims, situates it within the existing patent environment, and evaluates its strategic position.


Background and Patent Overview

AU2011276680 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use. While detailed claims review is essential, the patent's core likely covers a unique composition or therapeutic method, building upon prior art but distinguishing itself through inventive steps. The patent was filed to safeguard innovative drug claims, potentially addressing unmet needs or offering technological advantages.


Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

Claims define the legal boundaries of patent rights. In AU2011276680, the claims encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Likely include a novel chemical entity, its stereoisomers, salts, or prodrugs. These claims specify the molecular structure, possibly with stereochemical or positional restrictions explicating uniqueness.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, including excipients, delivery systems, or controlled-release features.

  • Method of Use Claims: Protect therapeutic methods involving the compound, such as treating a particular disease or condition.

  • Manufacturing Claims: Possibly extend to processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing formulations.

Claim breadth influences enforceability and patent robustness. Broad claims cover various embodiments but risk invalidation if overly encompassing. Narrow claims provide precise protection but may be easier to work around.

Independent vs. Dependent Claims

  • Independent Claims: Establish broad protection—potentially covering the compound's structure or class.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specificity, such as particular substitutions, dosages, or formulations, strengthening the patent by narrowing scope and reinforcing inventive contribution.

Claim Language and Patent Style

The claims likely employ chemical nomenclature aligned with IUPAC standards, with precise definitions. They may utilize Markush structures to cover a class of compounds, increasing the patent's scope.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

Prior Art and Novelty

AU2011276680’s claims aim to transcend prior art, potentially citing earlier patents or publications on similar compounds or methods. The patent's acceptance suggests the claims are sufficiently inventive and novel relative to existing disclosures.

Key considerations:

  • Patent families: The applicant probably has related patents in other jurisdictions, forming a patent family that extends global protection.
  • Secondary patents: It’s common for companies to file follow-up patents to fortify protection over the initial patent, particularly if the invention has commercialization potential.

Overlap and Competition

  • The patent landscape in the pharmaceutical field, especially for small-molecule drugs, tends to be crowded.
  • Competitors may hold patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods, prompting strategic licensing or challenge strategies.

Patentability and Validity

  • The patent’s validity depends on clear inventive steps, non-obviousness, and sufficient disclosure.
  • Potential challenges could originate from prior art citations or claims that are too broad, which might lead to invalidation of certain claims.

Freedom to Operate (FTO)

  • Enquiries should assess whether existing patents in Australia or abroad block commercialization.
  • AU2011276680 appears strategically positioned if its claims are sufficiently specific and well-differentiated.

Implications for the Industry

  • The patent enhances the patent estate of the applicant, offering exclusivity in the Australian market.
  • It can act as a basis for licensing negotiations or partnerships, especially if the compound demonstrates clinical efficacy.
  • The patent timeline (typically 20 years from filing) influences market entry strategies, with ongoing patent prosecution or oppositions potentially affecting scope.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

Patent rights are critical during drug development and regulatory approval. While patents don't guarantee regulatory approval, they safeguard market exclusivity post-approval, thus justifying R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • AU2011276680 appears to robustly protect a novel pharmaceutical compound or method, with claims spanning chemical, formulation, and therapeutic aspects.
  • The scope is strategically crafted to balance breadth for broad protection with specificity to withstand validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment, with the potential for ongoing patent family growth.
  • The patent's enforceability will depend on thorough examination and potential opposition proceedings.
  • For market players, it underscores the importance of comprehensive patent landscape analyses to avoid infringement and leverage patent rights effectively.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like AU2011276680?

Claims delineate the specific intellectual property rights, defining the scope of protection for the invention. They determine what competitors cannot legally produce, use, or sell, underpinning the patent's strategic value.

2. How does the scope of AU2011276680 compare to other pharmaceutical patents?

The scope depends on claim breadth—broad claims offer wider protection but risk invalidation; narrow claims provide precise coverage. Without detailed claims language, evaluating comparison is speculative but suggests coverage of particular compositions or methods.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?

Yes. Challenges may arise on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure. Prior art citations or opposition proceedings can contest its validity, especially if claims are overly broad or invalid.

4. What role does the patent landscape play in drug development and commercialization?

It guides strategic decision-making by identifying freedom to operate, potential licensing opportunities, and risks of infringement. A strong patent estate can significantly impact commercial success and market exclusivity.

5. How does AU2011276680 fit into the global patent strategy of its owners?

It likely forms part of a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in key jurisdictions. This ensures regional protection, reinforces market position, and supports global commercialization strategies.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2011276680
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Database
  3. Australian Patent Office Guidelines on Patentability
  4. Patent Landscape Reports in Pharmaceutical Innovation

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.