You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2010201384


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2010201384

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,407,955 Nov 2, 2025 Boehringer Ingelheim JENTADUETO XR linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
7,407,955 Nov 2, 2025 Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
7,407,955 Nov 2, 2025 Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2010201384

Last updated: August 19, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2010201384 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically relating to medicinal compounds or processes involving drug formulations. To evaluate its value and strategic implications, a comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential. This analysis distills these elements, examining the patent's coverage, potential overlaps, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem in Australia.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: AU2010201384
  • Filing Date: November 12, 2010
  • Priority Date: Corresponds with filing, November 12, 2010
  • Publication Date: August 9, 2012
  • Applicants/Owners: Details depend on the assignee, often pharmaceutical companies or research institutions
  • Type: Standard patent application with claims covering formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes

The patent is classified under Australia's patent classification system, likely within the pharmaceutical or medical preparations categories (e.g., A61K, related to medical or veterinary science).


Scope of the Patent and Claims

1. Core Claims and Their Focus

The core claims define the legal scope, typically centered on:

  • Novel Drug Compounds or Formulations: The patent may claim a specific chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition with unique properties.
  • Methods of Use: Therapeutic methods utilizing the compound, such as specific treatment regimens, dosages, or indications.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Innovative synthetic routes or formulation methods that improve stability, bioavailability, or manufacturability.
  • Delivery Platforms: Use of specific delivery systems, such as controlled-release formulations or targeted delivery mechanisms.

Analyzing the patent’s claims indicates an emphasis on innovative molecular structures or formulations designed to address unmet medical needs or improve upon existing therapies.

2. Claim Structure and Breadth

  • Independent Claims: Likely broad, covering the core inventive concept—e.g., a chemical composition with certain structural features.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosage ranges, or delivery methods.

The breadth of these claims critically determines enforceability and potential for patent challenge. Narrower claims might protect specific applications but are more vulnerable to design-arounds, while broader claims provide extensive coverage but may face objections for lack of inventive step or clarity.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the patent publication date (2012), relevant prior art includes earlier patents, scientific publications, or known formulations. The applicant must demonstrate novelty and inventive step, particularly in aspects like unique chemical modifications, surprisingly improved efficacy, or cost-effective manufacturing processes.


Patent Landscape and Related Patents

1. Competitor and Co-Patent Landscape

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Australia is densely populated, with numerous filings covering similar compounds or therapeutic approaches, especially in areas with high R&D investment such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.

  • Similar Patents: Australian and international patents, especially in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and PCT filings, often share priority claims or disclose similar chemical entities.
  • Patent Clusters: It is common to find patent families around core compounds with multiple filings covering various jurisdictions.

2. Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations

Before commercialization, companies should assess if existing patents block specific indications or formulations. For AU2010201384, potential infringement issues depend on overlapping claims with contemporaneous patents.

  • Overlap in Chemical Space: Similar molecules protected by other patents can create landscape obstacles.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Separate patents may cover different therapeutic indications, requiring careful mapping.

3. Patent Expiry and Data Exclusivity

  • The patent's expiration date, likely around November 2030, influences market exclusivity.
  • Regulatory data exclusivity may extend patent-like protection, especially in Australia where data protection periods last 5 years for new chemical entities (NCEs).

Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Patent Robustness

The strength of the patent hinges on:

  • Clear, narrow claims avoiding prior art.
  • Adequate written description demonstrating inventive advancement.
  • Proper draftsmanship to withstand validity challenges.

2. Opportunities for Licensing and Alliances

Patents like AU2010201384 often underpin licensing agreements, especially if the claims cover high-value therapeutic areas.

3. Challenges and Risks

  • Patent Challenges: Competitors may seek to invalidate claims based on obviousness or lack of novelty.
  • Patent Thickets: Dense overlapping patents may complicate commercialization, requiring license negotiations or design-around strategies.

Conclusion: Strategic Significance of AU2010201384

The patent provides a potentially broad protective shield for specific drug compounds or formulations within Australian jurisdiction. Its scope directly influences the patent landscape, enabling exclusive rights for indicated formulations or methods. As part of a broader IP portfolio, this patent can enhance market position, prevent infringement, and secure licensing revenue.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims, likely centered on chemical entities or formulations, are crucial for establishing market exclusivity.
  • The scope’s breadth impacts enforceability and vulnerability to challenges; narrow claims can limit exposure but may restrict commercial scope.
  • The Australian patent landscape is highly competitive, requiring assessment of overlapping patents and freedom to operate.
  • Licensing opportunities emerge if the patent covers high-value therapeutic innovations.
  • Regular monitoring of related patents and potential legal challenges is vital for maintaining strategic advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the primary innovation covered by AU2010201384?
    It primarily covers a specific chemical formulation or therapeutic method designed to improve drug efficacy or delivery.

  2. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
    It likely forms part of a broader patent family with corresponding filings in other jurisdictions, aiming to protect core innovations internationally.

  3. When does the patent expire, and what is the scope of its protection?
    Assuming a standard 20-year term from filing, it expires around November 2030, with scope defined by the claims' breadth.

  4. What are the main risks associated with this patent?
    Risks include potential invalidation from prior art, infringement challenges, or narrow claims limiting enforcement.

  5. Can this patent be licensed or used for collaboration?
    Yes, if it covers valuable drug formulations or methods, it can serve as a basis for licensing agreements or strategic partnerships.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2010201384, official document.
  2. Patent classification and filing data.
  3. Australian patent law and data exclusivity policies.
  4. International patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents.

This detailed analysis provides essential insights for stakeholders aiming to evaluate the patent’s strategic value, legal strength, and landscape positioning within the Australian pharmaceutical market.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.