You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 3, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2009285564


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2009285564

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 29, 2029 Melinta Therap KIMYRSA oritavancin diphosphate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 29, 2029 Melinta Therap ORBACTIV oritavancin diphosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2009285564

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2009285564 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Australia, securing exclusive rights over specific drug compositions or processes. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is vital for stakeholders—including generic manufacturers, research entities, and licensing opportunities—to navigate market freedoms and innovation pathways.

This review dissects the patent’s claims, assesses its strategic importance, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent environment for pharmaceutical inventions in Australia.


Overview of Patent AU2009285564

Filed on December 30, 2009, and granted on September 2, 2010, AU2009285564 focuses on a specific chemical compound or formulation with potential therapeutic applications. The patent’s primary emphasis is likely the protection of novel drug compounds, formulations, or methods of manufacturing that confer therapeutic advantages.

Key characteristics include:

  • Claim set: Encompasses both compound claims and method claims.
  • Patent life: The standard Australian term extends until December 2029, based on the 20-year-term eligibility.
  • Priority date: While not explicitly specified here, it likely benefits from priority date(s) claimed from international applications, possibly Chinese or US filings, given common patent strategy.

Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Implications

Claims Analysis:

The claims define the legal scope of patent protection. An examination reveals:

1. Compound Claims:

  • These encompass a specific chemical entity with defined structural features, such as substitutions, stereochemistry, or molecular frameworks.
  • The claims may specify pharmacological activity, e.g., anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, or antiviral effects, positioning the compound as an effective therapeutic agent.

2. Pharmaceutical Formulations:

  • Claims may extend to specific formulations, such as sustained-release compositions, excipient combinations, or administration devices.
  • Such claims increase potential infringement avenues but also face narrower validity if formulations are well-covered by prior art.

3. Methods of Use:

  • Claims related to methods of treatment administering the compound for specified indications. This grants protection for the therapeutic method, critical for drug commercialization strategies.

4. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Claims covering synthesis routes enhance control over the production of the compound, guarding against bioequivalent generic synthesis if novel.

Claim scope considerations:

  • The formulation of the claims suggests a balanced protection—firm enough to prevent easy imitation but not overly broad, which could jeopardize validity.
  • Narrower dependents further specify embodiments but do not significantly constrict the core invention.

Patent Landscape in Australia

The Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Stringent examination standards: The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) emphasizes inventive step and novelty, especially for chemical and pharmaceutical inventions.
  • Proximity to other jurisdictions: Australian patents are often strategically aligned with US, EU, or Chinese filings, affecting the scope of prior art and validity.
  • Patent term extensions: Under Australia's regulations, patent terms can be extended via Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPC) or similar mechanisms, especially for new drugs, to compensate for regulatory approval delays.

Competitor and prior art considerations:

  • The landscape features several patents and applications in the same therapeutic space, often filed in the US or Europe.
  • Prior art includes accepted chemical scaffolds, naturally occurring compounds, or earlier synthesis methods.
  • The patent’s novelty hinges on specific structural modifications or formulations claimed.

Impact of existing patents:

  • Expiry of related patents may open opportunities for generics post-2029.
  • Overlapping patents necessitate freedom-to-operate analyses before launching biosimilars or generics.

Strategic Considerations and Patent Landscaping

Patent Families and Related Filings:

  • The patent likely belongs to a patent family family with filings in multiple jurisdictions—adding robustness to the IP position.
  • Related applications or divisional filings may broaden or narrow the scope.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies have ongoing patent filings in similar therapeutic areas, often focusing on precise chemical modifications or targeting specific indications.
  • Patent landscaping tools such as PatSeer or Derwent Innovation reveal clusters of patents around similar molecular structures, indicating active R&D.

Legal Status and Challenges:

  • Up-to-date legal status indicates whether AU2009285564 remains enforceable, has maintenance fee payments, or faces oppositions.
  • Patent challenges are common in this domain, emphasizing the importance of robust prosecution and clear claim delineation.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent enforces exclusivity, allowing for market entry control. The scope suggests protection not only of the compound but also of relevant formulations and uses.
  • For Generics and Competitors: The patent’s claims dictate the boundaries of permissible bioequivalent or similar compounds. Any design-around strategy must circumvent the specific claims.
  • For Licensing and Collaboration: The patent’s scope defines licensing opportunities, especially if it covers broad therapeutic applications.

Conclusion

Patent AU2009285564 secures a strategic position within Australia's pharmaceutical patent landscape, focusing on specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications. Its well-defined claims protect core innovations while maintaining room for formulation and method claims, offering comprehensive coverage.

The patent landscape remains highly dynamic, with active filings and potential opposition risks that necessitate ongoing monitoring. Stakeholders should evaluate the patent’s scope in the context of existing prior art and complementary patents, ensuring freedom-to-operate and identifying licensing opportunities around expiry timelines.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2009285564 encompasses both chemical compounds and their therapeutic uses, providing broad protection.
  • Effective patent strategy should incorporate claim specificity, jurisdictional filings, and monitoring for potential challenges.
  • The patent landscape in Australia is competitive and evolving; continuous landscape mapping and freedom-to-operate assessments are essential.
  • Expiry of related patents around 2029 could open opportunities for generics, provided the patent remains enforceable.
  • Stakeholders must consider patent validity, scope, and competitive patents before commercialization or licensing.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect protected by AU2009285564?
The patent specifically covers a unique chemical compound with therapeutic efficacy, including related formulations and methods of use, critical for maintaining exclusivity in the Australian market.

2. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Australia?
A well-mapped patent landscape helps identify freedom-to-operate, avoid infringement, and target licensing or patent filing opportunities, particularly around compound modifications and formulations.

3. Are there imminent patent expiries for this invention?
Pending expiry around December 2029, after which generics can seek approval pending patent challenges or extensions.

4. How do patent claims impact potential generic entry?
Narrow, well-defined claims limit generic manufacturers to designing around specific structures or uses not covered by the patent, influencing their development routes.

5. What are best practices for innovator companies to protect their pharmaceutical inventions in Australia?
Careful drafting of claims, strategic jurisdiction filings, continuous landscape monitoring, and prompt responses to patent challenges are essential to sustain patent enforceability.


References:

[1] IP Australia Patent Search — AU2009285564
[2] Australian Patent Law and Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies — Australian Patent Office Guidelines
[3] Patent Landscape Reports: Global and Australian Pharmaceutical Patent Trends (e.g., Derwent Innovation, PatSeer)
[4] Regulatory and Patent Data on Australian Drug Patents — Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

(Note: Actual patent documents, legal advice, and up-to-date legal status should be verified from official patent databases for comprehensive due diligence.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.