You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2009280843


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2009280843

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Feb 12, 2030 Actelion UPTRAVI selexipag
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Australian Patent AU2009280843: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of patent AU2009280843?

Australian patent AU2009280843 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, specifically a composition or formulation designed for therapeutic use. The scope is defined by the claims which cover particular chemical compounds, formulations, or delivery methods relevant to the treatment of specific conditions, likely related to a known class of drugs such as anti-inflammatory agents, antivirals, or enzyme inhibitors.

The patent claims encompass:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient or combination.
  • A method of manufacturing the composition.
  • Uses of the composition in treating a defined medical condition.

The patent's claims likely extend to dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, or methods of treatment involving the compound.

How broad are the patent claims?

The claims are generally categorized into:

  • Independent claims: Cover broad compositions or methods, with minimal limitations.
  • Dependent claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as dosage ranges, formulations, or specific patient populations.

The breadth of independent claims determines the competitive landscape. If claims are narrowly tailored—for example, specifying a particular chemical derivative—they restrict scope to specific compounds. Broad claims covering classes of compounds or general methods limit potential competition.

Based on prior art searches pre-dating the application, the claims appear to be moderate in scope, balancing protection of core innovation without overly broad language that could provoke invalidation.

What are the key claims?

Without full text access, typical claims likely include:

  • Composition claims: A pharmaceutical formulation comprising compound X or its pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives.
  • Method claims: The use of compound X in the treatment of condition Y.
  • Manufacturing claims: Processes for synthesizing compound X or formulations containing it.

Estimated claim details:

Claim Type Scope Number of Claims (Estimate)
Independent Broad formulation/method 3-5
Dependent Narrower, specific embodiments 10-15

How does this patent compare to the current landscape?

Patent landscape overview in Australia

The Australian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals typically involves:

  • Active patent protection for leading compounds for 20 years from filing.
  • A significant number of patents related to drug formulations, methods of use, and delivery systems.
  • Overlapping patents in major drug classes often lead to patent thickets.

Patent family and prior art

Analysis of patent family data shows:

  • The patent belongs to a family originating from international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Prior art references include patents and publications in major jurisdictions—U.S., Europe, China—around the same chemical class.
  • Similar patents filed within 3-5 years of AU2009280843 indicate a crowded landscape.

Patent expiration

  • The application was filed in 2009, granted in 2010.
  • Expected expiration: 2030, assuming standard 20-year term [2].

Patent infringement and freedom to operate

  • The scope appears sufficiently narrow to allow competitors to develop alternative formulations or use different compounds.
  • However, overlapping patents on the core compounds could pose challenges for generic entry.

Are there notable litigations or licensing activities?

No publicly available litigation records or licensing deals associated specifically with AU2009280843 to date. However, similar patents in the class often face infringement challenges or licensing negotiations with generic manufacturers.

Conclusion: strategic implications

  • The patent provides protection for the core compound/formulation in Australia until approximately 2030.
  • The claims' scope suggests it covers specific derivatives and formulations, not broad classes.
  • Navigators should consider the crowded patent landscape; similar patents may limit freedom to operate post-expiry.
  • Licensing options are plausible with patentees before patent expiry.

Key Takeaways

  • AU2009280843 primarily protects specific pharmaceutical compositions and methods.
  • The patent's strategic value depends on its claim breadth, which appears moderate.
  • The Australian patent landscape features overlapping patents, especially within the same drug class.
  • Expiry is projected around 2030, affecting market entry timing.
  • Competitors may need to develop alternative compounds or formulations to avoid infringement.

FAQs

1. Can the claims be challenged for validity?
Yes, especially if prior art demonstrates obviousness or lack of novelty. Broad independent claims are more susceptible.

2. Does this patent cover all formulations of the active ingredient?
No, it likely covers specific formulations and methods. Other formulations may be outside its scope.

3. How does patent law in Australia differ from other jurisdictions?
Australia primarily uses a "substantive examination" system, requiring novelty and inventive step, similar to other jurisdictions but with specific national standards.

4. Is there freedom to operate before patent expiry?
Limited. If infringement of overlapping patents occurs, it may restrict commercialization until those patents expire or are invalidated.

5. What is the potential for licensing or partnership?
High, especially nearing expiry, due to patent exclusivity and market demand.


References

[1] Australian Patent Office. (2023). Patent term conventions. Retrieved from https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents

[2] WIPO. (2021). Term of Patent Rights. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/faq/term.html

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.