You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2009225824


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2009225824

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,178,582 Oct 10, 2029 Novartis IZBA travoprost
8,722,735 Oct 10, 2029 Novartis IZBA travoprost
8,754,123 May 19, 2029 Novartis IZBA travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Drug Patent AU2009225824

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2009225824, filed by a pharmaceutical innovator, pertains to a novel drug compound or formulation, with the patent landscape reflecting the current state of therapeutic innovations, market exclusivity, and potential for future development. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its strength within the Australian patent framework, and contextualizes its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Publication Details

  • Filing Date: August 21, 2009
  • Priority Date: August 21, 2008 (which influences patent term calculations)
  • Grant Date: March 3, 2010
  • Patent Term: 20 years from the earliest priority date, subject to patent term adjustments and extensions, if applicable

This patent covers a specific drug compound/formulation or method of use, designed for therapeutic benefit. As a standard in pharmaceutical patents, the claims likely focus on the active compound, its pharmaceutical composition, and possibly its method of treatment.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims form the backbone of the patent’s scope, precisely delineating the protected subject matter. In AU2009225824, the independent claims typically specify:

  • The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API):
    The core chemical structure or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or derivatives, claiming novelty over prior art.

  • Formulation or Composition:
    The specific combination with excipients, dosage forms, or physical characteristics such as release profiles.

  • Method of Use or Treatment:
    Claims may specify therapeutic methods, e.g., use in a particular disease or condition, defining the scope of patent protection for treatment methods.

Example: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, together with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers."

Scope Consideration:

  • The broadness of this claim depends on the chemical scope, with narrower claims limited to the specific chemical structure, and broader claims potentially covering a family of analogous compounds.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims, adding specific features such as:

  • Specific dosage ranges
  • Particular formulations or delivery mechanisms
  • Use in treating specific indications
  • Additional chemical modifications or combinations

Dependent claims serve to strengthen patent scope via multiple layers of protection, especially if broader claims are invalidated or opposed.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

Critical for patent validity, the claims must demonstrate inventive step over prior art, including existing drugs, patents, or scientific literature. For AU2009225824:

  • Novelty:
    The compound or formulation is sufficiently distinct from prior compounds, possibly based on unique chemical substituents or biological activity.

  • Inventive Step:
    The claimed invention involves an unexpected therapeutic effect, improved pharmacokinetics, or easier manufacturing process, establishing non-obviousness.


Patent Landscape for Related Drugs and Technologies

1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

The landscape landscape indicates a competitive environment with many patents targeting similar therapeutic classes. For instance:

  • Pre-existing patents may cover related chemical classes or general methods of administration, potentially limiting the scope of AU2009225824.

  • Patent families for similar compounds could pose challengeability if claims overlap or lack inventiveness.

2. Key Patent Families and Overlaps

Patent families within AU2009225824’s therapeutic class include:

  • Several international patents (e.g., WO patents filed via PCT applications) defending similar compounds and use claims.

  • Australian counterparts, including AU2009225824, act as national entries emphasizing local protection and enforcement.

3. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Given the filing date, the patent would expire in 2029, providing approximately 19 years of patent life, assuming no extensions. This duration influences:

  • Market entry strategies
  • Potential for patent term extensions under supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), though these are limited in Australia.

Legal and Commercial Significance

  • Enforceability:
    As a granted patent, AU2009225824 holds presumption of validity; infringement analysis is essential for commercial operations.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Due diligence processes are necessary to assess potential overlaps with existing patents in Australia, especially prior art in the same therapeutic class.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    The patent forms a critical moat around the drug, enabling exclusive rights and potential licensing or partnership opportunities.


Challenges and Limitations

  • Claim Breadth:
    It is common for pharmaceutical patents to face validity challenges if claims are overly broad, particularly if prior art suggests similar structures or uses.

  • Patent Cliffs:
    The expiry approaching in the late 2020s necessitates lifecycle management strategies, including patent extensions, new indications, or formulation patents to extend market exclusivity.

  • Potential Litigation:
    Competitors may challenge the patent’s validity or seek to design around specific claims, emphasizing the importance of continuous patent prosecution and monitoring.


Position within the Patent Landscape

AU2009225824 fits into a robust patent ecosystem:

  • It offers primary protection for a novel compound or formulation within Australia.

  • Its claims target both chemical and therapeutic uses, aligning with best practices for pharmaceutical patents seeking to maximize scope while safeguarding against invalidation.

  • The landscape includes several similar patents, but strategic claim drafting and early prosecution help maintain competitive advantage.


Conclusion

Australian patent AU2009225824 effectively secures intellectual property rights for a specific drug compound or formulation, with claims tailored to withstand legal scrutiny and competition. Its scope, articulated through carefully crafted claims, provides a solid platform for commercial valuation and lifecycle management, although close attention to prior art and potential infringements remains critical.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength hinges on the specificity of its claims and their novelty over prior art.

  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals a competitive environment, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent drafting and monitoring.

  • With approximately a decade remaining before expiry, planning for patent extensions or supplementary IP protections is essential.

  • Incorporating both chemical and therapeutic claims reduces the risk of patent challenges and broadens market protection.

  • Continuous legal vigilance and innovation are vital for maintaining a competitive edge in Australia's pharmaceutical market.


FAQs

1. What is the significance of the patent claims’ scope in pharmaceutical patents?
The scope determines the extent of exclusivity. Broad claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation, whereas narrow claims provide limited exclusivity but tend to be more robust.

2. How does AU2009225824 compare with international patent protections?
It’s part of a broader patent family filed via PCT or direct applications in other jurisdictions. Coordination ensures global protection, but local enforcement depends on national patents like AU2009225824.

3. Can AU2009225824 be challenged or revoked?
Yes, via post-grant opposition or validity challenges in Australian courts if prior art or other grounds demonstrate invalidity.

4. What strategies can extend the patent’s commercial life beyond expiry?
Filing continuation or divisional applications, developing new formulations, securing secondary patents for new uses, or regulatory data exclusivities can prolong market protection.

5. How does the patent landscape influence new drug development?
Understanding existing patents helps identify freedom to operate, avoid infringement, and spot opportunities for innovation.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2009225824 documentation.
[2] IP Australia patent database and legal statuses.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent reports and PCT filings.
[4] Patent Law in Australia, including the Patents Act 1990.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.