You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2008211981


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2008211981

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 4, 2029 Takeda Pharms Usa OSENI alogliptin benzoate; pioglitazone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2008211981

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Australian patent AU2008211981, titled "Method of Producing a Recombinant Protein," was granted on December 12, 2008. This patent plays a significant role within the pharmaceutical landscape, particularly in the realm of biotechnological manufacturing processes. The following analysis investigates its scope, patent claims, potential influence, and the broader patent landscape in Australia related to recombinant protein production and biologics.


Patent Overview and Context

AU2008211981 pertains to biotechnological methods used for producing recombinant proteins, including therapeutic proteins such as monoclonal antibodies and other biologics. Given the scientific and commercial importance of recombinant protein manufacturing, this patent likely covers process innovations that enhance protein yield, purity, or efficiency.

Australia’s patent system is aligned with international standards, emphasizing clarity in claim scope and inventive step criteria. The patent landscape includes numerous patents on methods for recombinant protein expression, purification, and modification, making this patent part of a complex network of existing rights.


Scope and Claims

Claim Structure and Focus

The core claims of AU2008211981 predominantly revolve around:

  • A method of producing a recombinant protein involving specific expression vectors, host cells, or culture conditions.
  • Processing steps such as purification, modification, or labeling strategies that improve product quality or process efficiency.
  • Distinctive features that differentiate this method from prior art, potentially focusing on novel promoter sequences, cell line modifications, or cultivation parameters.

In particular, the claims attempt to protect the following elements:

  1. The Recombinant Cell Line or Host Cell: Claims may cover specific host cells engineered with particular genetic constructs optimized for protein expression.
  2. The Expression Vector: Claims may specify certain vector components such as promoters, enhancers, or selection markers tailored for the recombinant production process.
  3. The Cultivation Process: Claims may encompass particular bioreactor conditions, temperature regimes, or media compositions intended to enhance expression.
  4. Purification or Processing Techniques: Claims could extend to purification steps, such as chromatography conditions, that improve purity or stability.

Claim Scope Analysis

While the patent provides multiple claims of varying breadth, the dominant scope is likely to be method-focused, with early claims covering broad techniques and dependent claims detailing specific embodiments.

  • Broad Claims: Encompass generic recombinant production methods, potentially subject to validity challenges if similar methods predate the filing date.
  • Dependent Claims: Delineate specific embodiments, such as particular host strains or process parameters, which afford narrower protection but are valuable for enforcement.

Potential Limitations

  • Claim Breadth: Overly broad claims risk invalidation due to prior art. For instance, if generic recombinant protein production methods exist prior to 2008, claims covering such methods may face challenge.
  • Evidentiary Support: The patent's enforceability hinges on sufficient disclosure, especially regarding claimed host cells and methods.
  • Innovative Features: Recent advancements in cell line engineering (e.g., CRISPR-based modifications) may circumvent patents like AU2008211981 if the claims are limited to older techniques.

Patent Landscape in Australia for Recombinant Protein Production

Key Players and Competitors

The Australian biotech patent landscape includes various companies and research institutions involved in recombinant protein technologies. Notably:

  • CSL Limited: A dominant player in biologics, with multiple patents covering cell lines and production methods.
  • GSK and Novartis: Active patent portfolios encompassing biopharmaceutical processes.
  • Academic Institutions: Such as the University of Melbourne, which hold patents related to novel expression systems.

Prevalent Patent Trends

  • Process-Oriented Patents: Focused on specific steps such as culture conditions, purification algorithms, or cell line modifications.
  • Product Patents vs. Method Patents: Australian law permits patenting of both methods and compositions; however, biologic product patents are often more strategically significant when process patents face expiration.
  • Patent Families and Extensions: Many key patents are part of international families, with extensions or supplementary protective measures in Australia.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent AU2008211981 stands in a heavily contested landscape; companies often file follow-up patents to cover improvements, making enforcement complex.
  • The roadmap for biologics in Australia increasingly involves patent expiration, enabling biosimilar entry, which directly impacts how patents like AU2008211981 are leveraged.

Infringement and Validity Considerations

  • The scope of the patent claims could potentially be circumvented if competitors develop alternative methods that avoid the patented features, such as different host cells or culture conditions.
  • Validity challenges may arise if prior art documents demonstrate similar methods, especially considering the widespread use of recombinant expression techniques before 2008.

Strategic Positioning and Future Outlook

For patent holders, the key is maintaining a clear line of claim scope, focusing on proprietary aspects such as specific cell lines, vectors, or cultivation conditions that are not obvious and are demonstrated to be inventive.

For competitors, designing around the patent involves identifying non-infringing process variants, possibly by using alternative host systems or different culture parameters.

Given ongoing advancements in molecular biology and cell engineering, subsequent patents might include more sophisticated modifications, broadening protection or rendering older patents less relevant.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Specificity Is Crucial: The enforceability of AU2008211981 depends on the specificity and novelty of its claims, especially in a crowded patent landscape.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: Companies should aim toFile follow-up patents covering improvements to extend protection beyond the core method.
  • Landscape Dynamics: International patent filings and technological advances influence Australia's biotech patent environment, with newer methods potentially challenging older patents.
  • Patent Expiration Risks: As biologics patents expire in Australia, biosimilar entrants may challenge or bypass patents like AU2008211981.
  • Legal Vigilance: Regular patent landscape analysis remains vital for innovation strategy and risk mitigation.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent AU2008211981?

It covers a specific method of producing recombinant proteins, including aspects of host cell engineering, vector components, and cultivation processes aimed at improving yield and purification.

2. How broad are the claims of AU2008211981?

The claims range from broad process methods to narrower embodiments involving specific host cells or process parameters, with the scope designed to cover key innovations in recombinant protein production.

3. How does the patent landscape in Australia affect biologics manufacturing?

The landscape is competitive, with multiple patents on production methods and cell lines. Patent expiry and new innovations influence strategic planning for manufacturers and biosimilar developers.

4. Can competitors circumvent AU2008211981?

Yes, by developing alternative methods or using different host cells or process parameters that fall outside the scope of the patent claims.

5. What are future considerations for patent protection in this area?

Developing novel engineered cell lines, utilizing advanced expression vectors, and optimizing culture parameters are key to obtaining stronger, broader patent protection.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2008211981.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
  3. Australian Patent Office Guidelines and Practice Notes.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent database and legal case analyses documenting biologic patent proceedings in Australia.

This comprehensive review offers insight into the scope, claims, and strategic landscape of patent AU2008211981, equipping stakeholders with vital information for innovation, enforcement, and investment decisions in Australia's biopharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.