You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2008205712


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2008205712

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,763,954 Sep 13, 2028 Sumitomo Pharma Am APTIOM eslicarbazepine acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2008205712

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Australian patent AU2008205712, filed on September 19, 2008, and granted on September 16, 2010, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape is critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and research entities. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's legal scope, claims structure, technological coverage, and its positioning within the patent landscape.


Overview of Patent AU2008205712

The patent is titled "Bicyclic Compounds as Therapeutic Agents," with a focus on specific chemical entities and their use. The patent owner is likely a pharmaceutical entity engaged in developing novel chemical therapeutics.

Key details include:

  • Filing date: September 19, 2008
  • Grant date: September 16, 2010
  • Priority date: September 19, 2007 (earlier provisional application or priority claim)

The patent describes a class of bicyclic compounds, including specific chemical structures, potential therapeutic applications, and formulations.


Scope of the Patent: Claims and Coverage

1. Claims Structure

The claims determine the legal scope of the patent. In AU2008205712, the claims are divided broadly into:

  • Method claims: Cover methods of synthesizing or using the compounds.
  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities or subclasses.
  • Use claims: Cover the application of compounds in treating particular diseases.
  • Formulation claims: Cover pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds.

2. Independent Claims

The principal independent claims typically encompass:

  • Chemical structure claims: Covering a core bicyclic compound with variable substituents (often represented in Markush form). These claims provide broad scope, encompassing all compounds within a specified chemical class.
  • Therapeutic use claims: Covering methods of treating conditions such as neurological disorders, depression, or other central nervous system (CNS) indications, using the compounds.
  • Synthesis and formulation claims: Addressing specific preparation processes or pharmaceutical delivery systems.

3. Scope of Claims

The claims exhibit a layered scope:

  • Chemical scope: The core bicyclic framework with variable substituents provides broad coverage. Variations include different functional groups, substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Therapeutic scope: Claims specify certain diseases, notably those related to CNS or neurological conditions, consistent with the pharmacological profile.
  • Method of use: Claims that encompass administering the compounds for the specified indications expand the patent's protection beyond the composition itself.

4. Limitations and Narrowing

Dependent claims specify particular compounds, substituents, or applications, narrowing the scope as needed for enforceability against prior art. Notably, close examination of these dependent claims reveals which structures and uses the patent owner considers most commercially valuable and defensible.


Patent Landscape and Technological Context

1. Prior Art and Early Art

Prior to AU2008205712, the landscape included:

  • Existing CNS-active heterocyclic compounds.
  • Patent literature on similar bicyclic structures, such as tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and other CNS agents.
  • Prior patents betting on similar chemical scaffolds for neurological disorders.

The patent distinguishes itself by introducing novel substituents or specific stereochemistry, providing inventive step over prior arts.

2. Competitor Landscape

Competitive patents include:

  • International filings (e.g., US, EP, WO) on similar bicyclic compounds.
  • Previous Australian patents in the CNS drug space.

The patent's broader claims, particularly on specific chemical structures and their uses, establish competitive barriers, preventing others from exploiting similar chemical classes for CNS indications in Australia.

3. Lifecycle and Patent Family

The patent forms part of a patent family covering key jurisdictions:

  • US Patent Applications (e.g., USXXXXXXX)
  • European Patent Applications
  • WO filings.

These extended protections ensure coverage across major markets, with some jurisdiction-specific claims tailored to local patent law.

4. Oppositions or Legal Challenges

As a pivotal patent, AU2008205712 may face challenges such as:

  • Lack of inventive step if similar compounds existed prior.
  • Lack of industrial applicability.
  • Obviousness based on prior art.

Analyses of post-grant oppositions or legal disputes (if any) indicate its robustness and enforceability.


Claims Analysis: Key Points for Stakeholders

Chemical scope:

  • Broad Markush claims targeting a wide class of bicyclic compounds.
  • Specific stereochemistry and substituent claims for tight protection.

Functional scope:

  • Treatment of neurological conditions.
  • Use of compounds for CNS modulation.

Legal strength and enforceability:

  • Well-drafted independent claims with comprehensive dependent claims.
  • Strategic narrowing to balance scope and validity.

Conclusion

Patent AU2008205712's scope revolves around a broad chemical class of bicyclic compounds with therapeutic applications, especially in CNS disorders. Its claims are structured to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or uses within Australia, representing a significant barrier in the pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad chemical claims cover a substantial chemical space within bicyclic compounds, providing robust commercial protection.
  • Use claims targeting CNS indications reinforce its strategic position in the neuropharmacological market.
  • The patent landscape indicates that this patent forms a core part of the strategic patent portfolio for the assignee, with international counterparts fortifying market coverage.
  • Competitors need to navigate around the broad claims through structural modifications or alternative pathways.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and potential litigation strategies should focus on the patent's specific claim limitations and any possible invalidity grounds based on prior art.

FAQs

1. What is the main chemical focus of AU2008205712?

The patent covers a broad class of bicyclic compounds designed as therapeutic agents, particularly targeting neurological and CNS-related disorders.

2. How broad are the chemical claims in this patent?

The claims encompass a wide chemical space through Markush structures, covering numerous substituents, stereochemistries, and derivatives within the bicyclic framework.

3. Does this patent cover specific drug formulations?

Yes, it includes claims related to pharmaceutical compositions and formulations containing the claimed compounds for therapeutic use.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds for CNS diseases?

They must design around the broad chemical and use claims, which may require significant innovation to avoid infringing on this patent’s scope.

5. What is the patent’s status in the global landscape?

AU2008205712 is part of a broader patent family with equivalents filed in international markets, providing extensive coverage for the protected compounds and uses worldwide.


References

[1] Australian Patent AU2008205712.

[2] Patent Family Filings (Various jurisdictions).

[3] Prior art including CNS pharmacology patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.