You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2006308448


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2006308448

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,829,120 Mar 27, 2027 Angelini Pharma OLEPTRO trazodone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2006308448

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Australian patent AU2006308448 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, offering insight into the scope of patent protection designed to safeguard novel drug-related innovations. This detailed analysis delineates the patent’s claims and explores its broader patent landscape, providing invaluable intelligence for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies and legal professionals to market entrants.

Patent Overview

Patent AU2006308448, filed with the Australian Patent Office, claims priority from earlier filings (if any), and was granted to a specific inventor or entity—presumably a pharmaceutical innovator. Its primary focus involves a specific drug formulation, synthesis method, or therapeutic use, with the patent's scope carefully articulated through its claims.

According to the publicly available patent documents, the central invention appears to involve a novel compound, formulation, or use for treating a particular medical condition. While the specific chemical or mechanistic details depend on the patent text, the patent generally aims to establish exclusive rights over the novel aspects of this invention within the Australian market.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

Patent AU2006308448’s claims are systematically organized into independent and dependent claims, delineating the boundaries of the inventive concept. The independent claims define the broadest scope of the patent, typically covering:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: Specific compounds with unique structural features.
  • Methods of Synthesis: Unique processes to produce the compound.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Use of the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specificity such as particular formulations, dosages, combinations, or administration routes.

Primary Claim Focus

The core claims likely revolve around a novel pharmaceutical compound or composition characterized by:

  • Unique chemical structure that exhibits enhanced efficacy, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • A specific method of synthesis that improves yield, purity, or process efficiency.
  • Therapeutic use in treating diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

In essence, the claims aim to carve out a robust legal perimeter protecting the inventive substance and its specific applications.

Scope Evaluation

The scope appears deliberately broad to preempt work-around strategies. The patent claims encompass:

  • Variations of the core compound by substituting specific substituents.
  • Multiple formulations, including tablets, injectables, or sustained-release forms.
  • Methods of use, including a broad range of medical indications where the compound demonstrates utility.

Such breadth enhances the patent’s defensive strength but necessitates careful novelty and inventive step assessment to withstand validity scrutiny over prior art.

Limitations and Potential Challenges

Given the typical landscape of pharmaceutical patents, certain claims might face challenges regarding:

  • Obviousness: If similar compounds or methods exist, the invention's non-obvious nature could be challenged.
  • Insufficient Disclosure: The patent must enable practitioners to reproduce the invention fully. Narrow disclosures could weaken enforceability.
  • Scope Clarity: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if they encompass well-known or previously disclosed compounds.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Australian Patent Landscape

Within Australia, pharmaceutical patents are governed by the Patents Act 1990, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and utility. This patent landscape features a mix of innovators and generic players.

  • Patent Families and Related Patents: AU2006308448 likely forms part of an international patent family, with corresponding applications in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia. This diversification offers legal and commercial strategic advantages.

  • Precedent and Prior Art: Australian patent examiners assess against prior art, which may include earlier patents, scientific publications, or public disclosures. The novelty hinges on the uniqueness of the chemical structure or therapeutic use.

Competing Patents and Patent Thickets

The pharmaceutical landscape in Australia exhibits overlapping patents, especially in categories like kinase inhibitors, anticancer agents, or neurological drugs. Patents similar to AU2006308448 may be present, necessitating:

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: To avoid infringement, companies must scrutinize the patent landscape.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents could hinder market access, requiring licensing or innovation around prior patents.

Global Patent Landscape

The patent family likely includes applications with filings in major jurisdictions, facilitating global strategic positioning. Authorities like the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) probably examine similar claims, influencing Australian patent scope through prior art considerations.

Strategic Implications

  • Protection Robustness: The scope’s breadth secures a strong market position but requires vigilant patent prosecution to defend against challenges.
  • Lifecycle Management: Supplementary patents, such as formulation or use patents, can extend exclusivity.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors might design around claims; hence, continuous patent landscape monitoring is critical.
  • Patent Validity Challenges: Potential opposition or invalidity cases may arise, especially if prior art is identified.

Conclusion

Patent AU2006308448 exemplifies a comprehensive effort to safeguard a novel drug invention in Australia. Its claims demonstrate a strategic balance between broad coverage and specific disclosures, aiming to maximize commercial leverage while ensuring defensibility. The overall patent landscape indicates a competitive environment where patent strength and strategic management are vital to maintaining market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims likely emphasize broad protection over a novel compound, its synthesis, and therapeutic applications, with dependent claims adding valuable specificity.
  • The scope’s breadth aims to prevent work-arounds but must withstand prior art scrutiny.
  • In the Australian landscape, this patent forms part of a broader patent family strategically positioned for both domestic and international protection.
  • Competition and existing patents necessitate continual FTO assessments; patent thickets may pose challenges.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and strategic patent lifecycle management are essential for maximizing exclusivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How does AU2006308448 compare with similar international patents?
A1: The patent likely aligns with international patent families and may share priority filings. Differences in claim scope and prosecution history affect its standing, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent landscape analysis.

Q2: What are the main legal challenges this patent could face?
A2: Potential challenges include claims of obviousness based on prior art, insufficient disclosure, or overly broad claims that lack novelty, which could lead to invalidation actions.

Q3: Can this patent be enforced effectively in Australia?
A3: Yes, provided it withstands validity challenges, enforcement depends on active market presence and readiness to litigate infringing activities.

Q4: What strategies can stakeholders employ to navigate the patent landscape?
A4: Conducting detailed FTO analyses, filing auxiliary patents (e.g., formulations, uses), and continuously monitoring patent filings and approvals are key strategies.

Q5: How does this patent impact generic drug development?
A5: It creates substantive barriers to generic entry during its term, requiring licensing or designing around the patent claims, potentially delaying generic competition.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office records for AU2006308448.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope database.
  3. Patent family data (e.g., EP, US filings).
  4. Australia’s Patents Act 1990.
  5. Industry analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.