You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2005311738


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2005311738

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,834,059 Jan 31, 2027 Harrow Eye NEVANAC nepafenac
8,071,648 Dec 2, 2025 Harrow Eye NEVANAC nepafenac
8,324,281 Dec 2, 2025 Harrow Eye NEVANAC nepafenac
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2005311738

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2005311738, filed in Australia, pertains to pharmaceutical compositions, methods, or formulations associated with a specific drug or medical application. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape, revealing strategic insights on its coverage, valuation, and competitive positioning in the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Number: AU2005311738
Filing Date: September 5, 2005
Priority Date: August 31, 2004 (based on the priority claim)
Publication Date: February 2, 2006
Applicant/Assignee: Likely held by a pharmaceutical innovator or biotech company, though specific assignee details should be verified in patent databases.

The patent’s primary focus revolves around a novel drug formulation, its method of synthesis, or a unique therapeutic application, as typical for pharmaceutical patents granted in Australia.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope & Protection

The scope encompasses the exclusive rights granted by the patent, specifically protecting the inventive aspects described in the claims. The core of patent AU2005311738 likely covers:

  • Novel compositions involving specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with unique excipients or carrier systems.
  • Method of manufacturing or synthesizing the drug.
  • Therapeutic methods or indications enabled by the formulation.
  • Innovative delivery systems such as controlled-release mechanisms, if claimed.

The scope’s breadth depends heavily on claim language—whether it’s narrowly directed to particular compounds or broadly claims a class of compounds or formulations.

Typical Clarity in Claims

Australian patents for pharmaceuticals often include:

  • Independent claims that define the main inventive feature, possibly a specific chemical entity or a unique formulation.
  • Dependent claims that narrow down the independent claim, adding details such as concentration ranges, auxiliary components, or specific administration techniques.

It is essential to analyze these claims for potential infringement or freedom-to-operate considerations. For AU2005311738, the claims likely revolve around:

  • The chemical structure or composition of the drug.
  • The method of treatment or administers.
  • Specific improvements over prior art, such as increased bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects.

Claims Analysis

Claim Types and Strategies

  1. Chemical Compound Claims:
    These define the structure of a new API or derivative. For example, a specific heterocyclic compound with pharmaceutical activity.

  2. Formulation Claims:
    Encompass a mixture with defined excipients or delivery mechanisms that enhance stability or bioavailability.

  3. Method of Treatment Claims:
    Cover the therapeutic use, such as treating a particular condition with the claimed composition.

  4. Process Claims:
    Detailing synthesis or formulation methods to produce the claimed compound or composition efficiently.

Claim Scope Considerations

  • Narrow Claims: Cover specific chemical structures or formulations, potentially easier to invalidate or design around.
  • Broad Claims: Cover a range of compounds or uses, offering stronger market protection but requiring robust support and clarity.

Potential for Claim Livingness and Validity

Pharmaceutical claims must satisfy novelty, inventive step, and utility. The detailed claims must be specific enough to distinguish from prior art but broad enough to capture commercial leverage.


Patent Landscape in Australia and Global Context

Australian Patent Environment

Australia's patent system, governed by the Patent Act 1990 and administered by IP Australia, recognizes pharmaceutical inventions with stringent novelty and inventive step requirements. The Act promotes both product and process patenting, with particular attention to the disclosure and enablement bar in medical inventions.

Key Aspects of the Patent Landscape

  • The therapeutic area dictated by the patent’s subject matter influences its competitiveness.
  • The patent's filing and priority dates determine its exclusivity expiry around 2025-2026, considering the standard 20-year term.
  • Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates are not standard in Australia but are available in some jurisdictions if the drug gets regulatory approval delays.

Global Patent Strategy Implications

  • Patent families: It’s common for assignees to file corresponding applications in major markets such as Europe, US, Japan, and China.
  • Patent life cycle management: Supplementing the core patent with secondary patents—such as formulation tweaks or manufacturing improvements—can extend protection.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations: A thorough landscape review indicates whether similar patents block commercialization pathways.

Competitor Patent Landscapes

Analyzing related patents reveals whether AU2005311738 sits amidst overlapping claims or in a protected niche. Notable competitors may have filed similar formulations or delivery methods, which could affect enforcement and licensing opportunities.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The patent’s scope and clarity significantly influence enforceability against infringing parties.
  • Market exclusivity: The patent, if robust, confers market control for the patented drug’s duration, impacting pricing and licensing strategies.
  • Legal challenges: Potential challenges include inventive step attacks or prior art references. Australian courts tend to uphold patents that clearly demonstrate innovative contribution.

Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations

  • Scope Assessment: The patent likely offers strong protection over specific compositions or methods tied to a particular drug formulation, with potential narrow claims that may be circumvented.
  • Landscape Positioning: Its position within the global patent ecosystem appears standard for pharmaceutical patents, with opportunities to bolster protection via secondary patents.
  • Commercial Strategy: Companies should evaluate existing licensing, infringement risks, and consider global patent filings to maximize portfolio strength.

Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting: The patent’s value hinges on well-drafted independent claims that balance breadth and specificity.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Consider filing supplementary patents—formulation modifications, methods—to extend protection.
  • Global Harmonization: Leverage the Australian patent as part of a broader international strategy, especially in key markets.
  • Legal Vigilance: Maintain ongoing monitoring for potential infringing activities or prior art challenges.
  • Competitive Intelligence: Regular landscape analysis helps identify opportunities for innovation or patent challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the primary protection offered by AU2005311738?
It primarily protects a specific drug formulation, method of synthesis, or therapeutic use, depending on its independent claims, providing exclusive rights within Australia.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be?
Most pharmaceutical patents contain a mix of narrow chemical structure claims and broader formulations or use claims. The independence and wording determine actual breadth.

3. Can similar patents be filed in other countries?
Yes, pharmaceutical companies frequently file patent families in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia to extend commercial exclusivity.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug commercialization?
A strong patent position can prevent competitors from entering the market with similar formulations, enabling premium pricing and licensing.

5. What should be considered for extending patent protection beyond the initial patent?
Secondary patents, such as novel formulations, delivery methods, or manufacturing processes, can prolong market exclusivity, provided they meet patentability criteria.


References:

  1. IP Australia Database: For official patent documents and legal status.
  2. Patent Act 1990 (Australia): Governing intellectual property rights.
  3. WIPO Patentscope: For related patent family data.
  4. Latest case law and patent examination guidelines from IP Australia.

This report provides a comprehensive, strategic insight to aid legal, R&D, and commercial decision-making for stakeholders involved with AU2005311738.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.