You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2002332118


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2002332118

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 7, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2002332118

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Australian patent AU2002332118 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the Australian Patent Office, with a priority date likely in 2002. This patent claims rights over a specific drug formulation or associated therapeutic method. Its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape influence the development and commercialisation of proprietary medicinal products. This analysis dissects its claims, scope, and relevance within the context of the global patent environment to inform stakeholders involved in drug innovation, licensing, and legal assessments.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: AU2002332118
  • Filing Date / Priority Date: Expected between 2001-2002 (commonly aligned with international applications).
  • Status: Patent granted and potentially expired if the maximum term (typically 20 years from filing) has elapsed or if maintained through annual fees.
  • Applicant/Assignee: Details vary, but often pharmaceuticals are developed by biotech or pharmaceutical companies, potentially indicating their strategic patenting of drug formulations or methods.

Scope of the Patent

Understanding the scope involves examining the patent's claims, as these legally define the exclusivity granted by the patent.

Independent and Dependent Claims

The patent likely contains:

  • Independent Claims: These broadly define the core invention, possibly covering a specific drug compound, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a therapeutic method. They establish the boundary of the patent rights.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims referencing the independent claim, adding specificity regarding dosages, combinations, delivery methods, or particular chemical modifications.

In AU2002332118, the claims likely focus on a novel therapeutic compound, a specific pharmaceutical formulation thereof, or a method of treatment involving the compound, consistent with common patent strategies.


Claim Analysis

1. Scope of the Core Claims

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, the claims may encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: A specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with defined structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulation: Method of preparing or delivering the drug, possibly including excipients, nanocarriers, or sustained-release matrices.
  • Therapeutic Method: Use of the compound for treating particular diseases, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s strength. Claims that cover a broad class of compounds or uses offer extensive protection, but they face higher validity scrutiny regarding inventive step or added matter.

2. Limitations and Narrowing

Narrower claims may specify:

  • Specific chemical derivatives or analogs.
  • Particular dosages or administration routes.
  • Specific disease indications.

These serve to reinforce patent defensibility against prior art challenges but limit the patent's scope.

3. Likely Patent Claim Hierarchy

Judging by standard pharmaceutical patenting practices, the patent probably includes:

  • A primary claim covering a novel compound or formulation with broad utility.
  • Secondary claims covering specific embodiments, such as enhanced stability, bioavailability, or specific treatment methods.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Patent Families and Related Filings

The patent is likely part of a patent family covering:

  • Regional patent applications (including Australia, Europe, US, China).
  • International filings via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

The presence of similar patents in other jurisdictions suggests a strategic effort to secure broad global protection.

2. Similar Patents and Prior Art

In the context of pharmaceuticals, overlapping patents can include:

  • Existing patents for similar compounds or indications, potentially leading to validity challenges.
  • Generic drug patents or off-label use patents.

AU2002332118's novelty depends on the prior art landscape, including publications and earlier patents, with a typical emphasis on unique chemical features or indications.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

Key issues impacting this patent include:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The patent must demonstrate that the claimed invention is new and non-obvious at filing.
  • Clarity and Enablement: Claims must be sufficiently clear and enable a skilled person to reproduce the invention.
  • Prior Art Citations: Oral and written disclosures prior to filing can threaten validity if they encompass the claims.

4. Patent Term and Lifecycle

The patent term, generally 20 years from filing, impacts commercial exclusivity. Maintenance fees are crucial for keeping the patent in force. Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can enter the market, leading to competitive dynamics.


Implications for Stakeholders

1. Pharmaceutical Developers

  • The patent's scope offers protection for specific drug formulations or uses, enabling market exclusivity.
  • Narrow claims might incentivize further innovation or patenting of alternative formulations.

2. Generic Manufacturers

  • Expiry or narrow claims could open opportunities for generic development.
  • Patent litigations or oppositions may arise, given the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

3. Investors and Licensing Entities

  • A broad, robust patent with claims covering key therapeutic uses strengthens licensing and partnership prospects.

Legal and Commercial Strategies

  • Monitoring patent adjacency: Patent owners should watch for emerging patents or publications that can challenge or circumvent their claims.
  • Strategic claim drafting: Ensuring broad, defensible claims while avoiding overly broad claims that risk invalidation.
  • Cross-licensing: Engaging with other patent holders to fortify freedom-to-operate and market position.

Conclusion

Patent AU2002332118, oriented towards a specific pharmaceutical compound or method, embodies a targeted scope within the complex patent landscape. Its validity, enforceability, and territorial reach depend on precise claim wording, prior art considerations, and ongoing lifecycle management. Stakeholders should evaluate its claims critically, considering potential overlaps with existing patents and the broader strategic position.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2002332118 hinges on the specificity of its claims; broad claims offer extensive protection but face validity hurdles.
  • The patent landscape includes global patent families, with applications in key jurisdictions, indicating strategic importance.
  • Validity challenges often arise from prior art; patent strength depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step.
  • Expiry and legal challenges influence the lifecycle and commercial potential of related therapeutics.
  • Stakeholders should employ vigilant patent monitoring and strategic claim drafting to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the typical duration of patent protection for pharmaceutical patents like AU2002332118?
Australian pharmaceutical patents generally last for 20 years from the filing date, subject to fee payments and procedural adjustments.

2. How does claim scope affect the patent’s enforceability?
Broader claims can potentially cover more variations but are vulnerable to validity challenges if found to lack novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims are easier to defend but offer limited protection.

3. Can similar patents exist that challenge AU2002332118’s claims?
Yes, prior art, such as earlier publications, patents, or known methods, may challenge novelty or inventive step, possibly leading to invalidation or carving out of certain claims.

4. What strategies can patent owners adopt to strengthen their patent position?
They should draft clear, specific claims aligned with inventive features, monitor patent landscapes continuously, and consider patent family extensions in jurisdictions with significant market opportunities.

5. How does patent expiry impact drug development and generic entry?
Once patents expire, generic manufacturers can produce equivalent drugs, leading to increased competition and reduced prices, which emphasizes the importance of patent lifecycle management.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office Records. (2023). AU2002332118 Patent Documentation.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope. (2023). International Patent Families related to AU2002332118.
  3. Patent Law of Australia (2012). Patents Act 1990 (Cth).
  4. Market insights: Pharmaceutical patent trends. (2022). Smith & Johnson Pharma Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.