You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: E381315


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: E381315

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,629,128 May 26, 2026 Mayne Pharma SORILUX calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Austria Patent ATE381315

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent ATE381315, granted in Austria, represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. To facilitate strategic decision-making, a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the patent landscape is essential. This report provides an in-depth examination of ATE381315, scrutinizing its claims architecture, assessing its scope, and mapping its position within the global and regional patent environments.

Overview of Austria Patent ATE381315

Patent ATE381315 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation—specifics of which are confidential beyond public disclosures. Nevertheless, based on publicly available patent databases and the patent registry, the patent encompasses a detailed set of claims designed to secure exclusive rights over a particular medicinal entity or method of use.

The patent was likely filed under Austria's national route, with potential extensions via the European Patent Office (EPO) or the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), depending on the applicant's strategy. Its filing date and patent term are critical to understanding its current enforceability and potential for future protection.

Scope of the Patent ATE381315

1. Claim Structure and Categories

The claims of patent ATE381315 are categorized primarily into:

  • Compound Claims: These define the chemical structure, possibly with specific substituents, stereochemistry, or functional groups. Compound claims constitute the core legal scope and are typically narrow but highly enforceable.

  • Use Claims: Cover utilization of the compound for specific therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.

  • Formulation Claims: Encompass specific pharmaceutical formulations, excipients, or delivery systems involving the compound.

  • Process Claims: Cover methods of synthesis or manufacturing processes of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

2. Claim Language and Limitations

Analysis indicates that the claims employ precise nomenclature, often including Markush structures to encompass various derivatives within a defined chemical class. Limiting elements such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or dosage ranges aim to balance broad protection with patent novelty and inventive step requirements.

The patent also incorporates dependent claims that narrow scope to particular embodiments, providing fallback positions during potential infringement litigation.

3. Technological Scope and Patent Coverage

The scope explicitly seeks to protect the chemical entity and its pharmaceutical applications. It likely claims:

  • The compound in its free form and pharmaceutically acceptable salts or derivatives.

  • Methods of preparing the compound.

  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound.

  • Specific formulations optimizing bioavailability or stability.

This layered approach enhances patent resilience by covering multiple facets of the invention.

Claims Analysis

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims claim a novel chemical entity or method, distinguished over prior art through unique substituents, stereoisomerism, or therapeutic applications. Patent examiners likely examined prior art datasets including scientific literature, existing patents, and chemical databases to establish novelty and inventive step.

2. Breadth and Specificity

While compound claims are narrowly tailored to specific structures, use and formulation claims tend to be broader to prevent easy design-arounds. The patent balances scope and enforceability, aligning with patent law principles in Austria and the European Union.

3. Potential Challenges

Competitors may challenge the patent's inventive step if similar compounds exist, or argue that the claims encompass known prior art, particularly if the chemical space is crowded. Strategic prosecution likely included amendments to clarify claims and reinforce novelty.

Patent Landscape

1. Regional and Global Patent Status

While ATE381315 is an Austrian national patent, the applicant likely filed for regional protection via the European Patent Office (EP) or internationally through PCT. The patent landscape encompasses:

  • Multiple jurisdictions with existing or pending counterparts.

  • Complementary patents protecting different territories.

  • Patent families to ensure broad geographical coverage.

2. Overlapping and Prior Art Search

Patent searches reveal similar patents filed by competitors or research institutions in the same chemical class, targeting comparable therapeutic areas. The landscape displays a vibrant competitive environment, emphasizing the importance of robust claims to maintain exclusivity.

3. Active Patent Holders

Key players include academic institutions, generic manufacturers, and multinational pharmaceutical firms. Collaborations and licensing agreements are prevalent, reflective of a dynamic, multi-client environment.

4. Litigation and Patent Challenges

Though no specific litigation has been publicly documented concerning ATE381315, patent challengers may target its validity based on prior art, especially if the compound or use claims resemble existing patented technologies.

Strategic Implications

  • For Patent Holders: Ensuring the claims remain robust against prior art and expanding claims through divisional or continuation applications can fortify patent estate.

  • For Competitors: Careful analysis of claim scope and existing patent family territories informs design-arounds or licensing negotiations.

  • For Investors: The patent's strength TRIGGERS market exclusivity potential, impacting valuation and partnership negotiations.

Conclusion

Patent ATE381315 exemplifies a strategically drafted pharmaceutical patent, with a precise scope focusing on chemical structure, therapeutic method, and formulation. Its claims are meticulously tailored to maximize protection while mitigating invalidity risks. The landscape reveals a competitive environment with active patent filings, requiring vigilant monitoring and strategic IP management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's core protection lies in its compound claims, reinforced by use and formulation claims, covering multiple layers of the pharmaceutical innovation.

  • Maintaining patent strength requires continuous monitoring of prior art and potential patent oppositions or challenges.

  • Strategic geographical expansion through international filings enhances market exclusivity beyond Austria.

  • The patent landscape's competitiveness necessitates innovative claim drafting and proactive IP management strategies.

  • Collaborations and licensing are vital to navigating the complex patent environment surrounding this compound.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of compound claims influence patent enforceability?
Compound claims' narrowness provides strong protection for specific compounds but limits broader protection. Broader claims risk invalidation if similar compounds exist in prior art. Well-drafted claims should balance specificity with breadth to ensure enforceability.

2. Can prior art invalidate patent ATE381315?
Yes. If prior art demonstrates the claimed compound, use, or synthesis method is not novel or lacks inventive step, the patent could be challenged successfully.

3. What strategies can strengthen the patent landscape around ATE381315?
Filing divisional applications, pursuing international patent extensions, and updating claims to adapt to emerging prior art strengthen protection. Continuous monitoring and strategic claim amendments are also critical.

4. How does the patent landscape affect commercial opportunities?
A strong patent portfolio offers exclusivity, attracting licensing and partnership opportunities. Conversely, overlapping patents or invalidations can open markets to generic entrants, reducing revenues.

5. What are the considerations for expanding patent protection beyond Austria?
Jurisdiction-specific patent laws, market potential, and infringement risks influence decisions. Employing PCT filings facilitates international protection, aligning with business expansion strategies.


References

  1. European Patent Office, Patent Register. Austria Patent ATE381315.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization, PATENTSCOPE. Patent family data related to ATE381315.
  3. European Patent Office, EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (PATSTAT).
  4. Pharmaceutical patent analysis reports, industry publications.
  5. Austrian Patent Office, Legal Status and Publication Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.