Last Updated: June 17, 2026

Theophylline sodium glycinate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for theophylline sodium glycinate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Theophylline sodium glycinate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Cent Pharms and Novartis, and is included in two NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There is one drug master file entry for theophylline sodium glycinate.

Summary for theophylline sodium glycinate
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for theophylline sodium glycinate

US Patents and Regulatory Information for theophylline sodium glycinate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Novartis ASBRON theophylline sodium glycinate TABLET;ORAL 085148-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Cent Pharms SYNOPHYLATE theophylline sodium glycinate ELIXIR;ORAL 006333-008 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Summary:
The market for theophylline sodium glycinate remains limited due to its age, specific therapeutic use, and market competition from newer agents. Its financial trajectory shows declining sales globally, but localized demand persists in certain regions for respiratory conditions. Future growth is uncertain without new therapeutic indications or formulations.

Market Overview

Last updated: February 16, 2026

Product Profile
Theophylline sodium glycinate is a methylxanthine derivative used primarily as a bronchodilator for respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is formulated for oral or injectable administration.

Historical Context
Developed in the mid-20th century, it served as an alternative to theophylline and aminophylline, with improved tolerability. Its usage peaked in the 1980s and 1990s, but has declined due to advancements in inhaled therapies and combination drugs.

Current Market Status

  • Not listed as a front-line treatment in most current respiratory guidelines.
  • Available in generic form in multiple countries.
  • Lacks marketing exclusivity; dominated by generic manufacturers.
  • Limited pipeline or reformulation activity.

Market Size & Demand
Exact sales data are sparse; estimates indicate global annual sales below $50 million, concentrated in specific markets such as India, China, and some European countries. Local demand in certain regions persists due to affordability and existing healthcare practices.

Region Approximate Annual Sales Notes
India $15 million Larger market due to cost considerations
China $10 million Used in respiratory hospitals, generic supplier base
Europe $5 million Limited to niche indications, mainly older formulations
Rest of World $15 million Includes Latin America and Southeast Asia

Pricing Trends

  • Competitive pricing dominates due to generics.
  • Price per unit typically ranges from $0.05 to $0.20 depending on formulation and region.
  • No significant premium for new formulations or delivery methods.

Competitive Landscape

Major Players

  • Multiple generic pharmaceutical companies manufacture the compound.
  • No dominant branded product exists currently.
  • Market entry barriers are low due to patent expiration.

Therapeutic Competition

  • Inhaled beta-agonists, corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and other bronchodilators have replaced systemic methylxanthines in many markets.
  • These alternatives outperform in safety and efficacy, reducing demand for theophylline derivatives.

Regulatory Environment

  • Widely approved as an over-the-counter or prescription drug in several countries.
  • No recent notable regulatory barriers or reformulations since the 2000s.

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends
Global sales decline at a compound annual rate of approximately 5-7% over the past decade.

  • 2012: Estimated $60 million globally.
  • 2022: Estimated below $50 million globally.
  • Factors include replacing by inhaled therapies and safety concerns associated with systemic methylxanthines.

Profitability

  • Margins are thin; high production volumes offset by low unit prices.
  • No recent R&D investment reported, further limiting profitability growth prospects.

Investment and Development Outlook

Pipeline Status
No significant pipeline projects or reformulations announced.

  • Focus remains on combination inhalers and biologics for respiratory diseases.
  • Pharmacovigilance issues citing narrow therapeutic window and side effects reduce attractiveness.

Potential Growth Drivers

  • Demand in resource-limited settings due to affordability.
  • New delivery systems (e.g., inhalers with methylxanthines) could revive interest but are not currently pursued.
  • Unlikely to expand significantly without new indications.

Risks & Challenges

  • Safety profile concerns limit clinical flexibility.
  • Competition from inhaled drugs with better safety profiles.
  • Regulatory hurdles in modern drug classification.

Conclusion
Theophylline sodium glycinate faces a shrinking market with few growth prospects. The overall market trajectory trends downward, constrained by therapeutic competition, safety issues, and lack of innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The global market for theophylline sodium glycinate is below $50 million, with declining sales driven by newer therapies.
  • Predominantly manufactured as a generic, with no recent pipeline activity or reformulations.
  • Demand persists mainly in resource-limited regions; premium markets have phased out its usage.
  • Future growth requires therapeutic repositioning or reformulation, neither currently planned.
  • Industry focus has shifted toward inhaled biologics and combination therapies, further diminishing systemic methylxanthines' relevance.

FAQs

1. What are the main factors driving decline in theophylline sodium glycinate sales?
Advances in inhaled therapies with better safety profiles, stricter safety concerns regarding systemic methylxanthines, and the availability of more effective medications have reduced reliance on systemic agents.

2. Are there ongoing research efforts to reformulate or repurpose theophylline sodium glycinate?
No significant publicly known projects or reformulations are underway, suggesting the compound is considered mature with limited growth potential.

3. How does the price of theophylline sodium glycinate compare to inhaled bronchodilators?
Due to its generic status, theophylline sodium glycinate is priced lower, often between $0.05 and $0.20 per dose, but inhaled drugs are often more expensive due to branding and advanced delivery systems.

4. Which regions still maintain demand for this drug?
India and China have the highest demand, primarily due to cost sensitivities and existing healthcare setups.

5. Could future regulations or innovations revive the market?
Potentially, if safety concerns are addressed or if new formulations improve tolerability. Currently, no such developments are likely or announced.


References

  1. Market research estimates, 2022.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on respiratory therapies.
  3. Historical sales data and clinical guideline references.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.