Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Cefepime hydrochloride - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for cefepime hydrochloride and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Cefepime hydrochloride is the generic ingredient in six branded drugs marketed by B Braun, Acs Dobfar, Astral, Chartwell Rx, Hikma, Hospira Inc, Qilu Antibiotics, Sagent Pharms Inc, Baxter Hlthcare, Samson Medcl, and Orchid Pharma, and is included in thirteen NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are nine drug master file entries for cefepime hydrochloride. Ten suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for cefepime hydrochloride
US Patents:2
Tradenames:6
Applicants:11
NDAs:13
Drug Master File Entries: 9
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 10
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 114
Clinical Trials: 64
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in cefepime hydrochloride?cefepime hydrochloride excipients list
DailyMed Link:cefepime hydrochloride at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for cefepime hydrochloride

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of PennsylvaniaPHASE4
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)PHASE4
Eric Solutions LLCPHASE1

See all cefepime hydrochloride clinical trials

Pharmacology for cefepime hydrochloride

US Patents and Regulatory Information for cefepime hydrochloride

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Chartwell Rx CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 090291-002 Dec 21, 2010 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hikma CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 214402-002 May 22, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Orchid Pharma EXBLIFEP cefepime hydrochloride; enmetazobactam POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 216165-001 Feb 22, 2024 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Qilu Antibiotics CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 203704-001 Feb 1, 2016 RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira Inc CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065369-001 Jun 18, 2007 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira Inc CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 202268-001 Jul 30, 2012 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CEFEPIME IN PLASTIC CONTAINER cefepime hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050817-001 Aug 5, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: June 22, 2026

CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE Market dynamics and financial trajectory: sales trends, pricing pressure, and generic/biosimilar risk

Cepepime hydrochloride (cefepime; multiple-sponsor generic complex) is a mature, largely commoditized hospital antibiotic. Market value is dominated by US and EU acute-care purchasing and tendering, with pricing pressure driven by widespread generic availability, periodic supply normalization, and hospital formulary tightening. The financial trajectory is expected to track utilization cycles for Gram-negative sepsis and hospital-acquired infections, offset partially by margin erosion from generic entrants and conversion to lower-cost competitors.

What matters commercially

  • Demand: bloodstream infections, complicated UTIs, hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia indications.
  • Revenue shape: high institutional penetration, low brand premium, frequent tender re-awards.
  • IP leverage: limited or expired for cefepime as a small-molecule antibiotic; practical protection often rests on product-specific manufacturing controls, packaging, and remaining patent tail coverage for certain dosage forms or method-of-use claims in select jurisdictions.
  • Competitive regime: multi-ANDA generic landscape; contract purchasing determines net price more than list pricing.

Is cefepime hydrochloride a brand or generic and who supplies it?

Direct answer: Cefepime hydrochloride is overwhelmingly supplied as generic (ANDA) products in major markets, with multiple manufacturers selling injectable cefepime formulations to hospitals, distributors, and wholesalers.

Commercial implications

  • Net pricing is contract-based. Changes in tender wins, group purchasing organization (GPO) dynamics, and wholesaler channel inventory affect realized revenue more than pricing to end sites of care.
  • Supply disruptions drive short-term price spikes that reverse when inventory normalizes. The market is typically “elastic” to procurement behavior during shortages.

Typical buyer structure

  • Hospital pharmacy and ID stewardship committees
  • GPOs and centralized purchasing organizations
  • Distributor-led demand through inpatient formularies and emergency procurement channels

What drives cefepime hydrochloride demand in hospitals?

Direct answer: Cefepime demand is driven by Gram-negative coverage needs in acute care, with usage concentrated in sepsis and nosocomial infection bundles.

Key utilization demand drivers

  • Empiric therapy protocols for hospital-acquired infections and complicated intra-abdominal/urinary sources where broad-spectrum Gram-negative activity is needed
  • Step-down and de-escalation pathways based on culture results and local antibiogram patterns
  • ICU and ED throughput, since empiric prescribing is time-pressured and protocol-driven

Secondary drivers

  • Antimicrobial stewardship programs: may limit unnecessary empiric use, but cefepime can remain in preferred pathways because it is a cost-effective broad-spectrum option
  • Seasonal variation in hospital admissions: affects overall infection incidence and antibiotic utilization

How do hospital formularies and tender dynamics affect cefepime pricing?

Direct answer: Cefepime pricing is mainly set by competitive tender outcomes and formulary tiering, with generic conversion forcing downward pressure.

Mechanics of pricing

  • Hospitals and GPOs award contracts to lowest total cost (unit price plus logistics and service terms).
  • Multi-source competition compresses gross margin. Net price can fall sharply after each meaningful competitive re-entry or contract re-award.
  • Shortages cause temporary pricing relief, but this is usually transient.

Revenue consequence

  • The market behaves like a commodity, with revenue more sensitive to volumes (protocol adherence, admission patterns) and contract wins than to sustainable price premiums.

When does cefepime hydrochloride face generic entry or supply disruption risks?

Direct answer: Generic entry risk is structurally ongoing in a mature product, but major revenue discontinuities usually come from supply shocks, not from incremental IP-driven barriers.

Generic entry scenario logic for a mature antibiotic

  • Many product presentations (strengths, package size, reconstitution guidance, labeling) can be sourced from multiple ANDA holders.
  • New entrants mainly compete on cost, distribution reach, manufacturing capacity stability, and contract bidding.

Supply disruption risk

  • Sterile injectable manufacturing is a chokepoint. Any disruption can shift procurement to other strengths/brands or cause emergency purchasing behavior.
  • Inventory cycles influence monthly sales more than demand changes.

What patents protect cefepime hydrochloride and when do they expire?

Direct answer: For cefepime itself, the core compound intellectual property has long since expired, so market protection is largely limited to product-specific patents and jurisdiction-specific filings. The remaining practical estate, where it exists, typically does not block generic access to the same active ingredient in standard injectable presentations.

Commercial impact

  • Litigation-driven exclusivity is not a primary driver for ongoing revenue in most cefepime markets.
  • Any “IP tail” usually affects specific product attributes (method of manufacture, formulation details, labeling, or specific delivery device) rather than broad cefepime molecule exclusivity.

Business interpretation

  • Investment and licensing strategies that assume durable molecule-level exclusivity for cefepime generally do not match the market structure.

What is the Orange Book status of cefepime hydrochloride?

Direct answer: Cefepime hydrochloride is listed via multiple generic NDA/ANDA products in the FDA Orange Book framework, reflecting widespread generic approvals and approvals for different manufacturers and application holders.

How this changes commercialization

  • Patent paragraph strategies (Orange Book-driven exclusivity barriers) tend to be less meaningful when many products are already multi-source.
  • FDA listing breadth correlates with procurement flexibility for hospitals, raising the ceiling on generic substitution.

How many FDA-approved cefepime hydrochloride products are on the market?

Direct answer: The cefepime injectable market is multi-manufacturer and multi-NDC, with multiple strengths and packaging configurations available through different sponsors.

Revenue impact

  • With many interchangeable SKUs, customers can switch suppliers quickly, especially during tender periods or when one supplier’s logistics become less reliable.

How does cefepime compare with other hospital antibiotics on price and competitive position?

Direct answer: Cefepime competes in hospital Formularies against other broad-spectrum Gram-negative agents (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, levofloxacin in select pathways, and newer anti-resistance agents where applicable).

Competition dynamics

  • Cefepime’s role often depends on local stewardship decisions balancing spectrum, toxicity profiles (e.g., neurotoxicity considerations in renal impairment), and cost.
  • In many formularies, cefepime remains a “default” option because it is cost-efficient compared with carbapenems and newer agents, provided stewardship targets are met.

Net result

  • Cefepime revenue tends to track broad-spectrum utilization volumes more than it tracks competitive innovation. When stewardship favors carbapenems or novel combinations, cefepime volumes can soften.

What financial trajectory can investors expect for cefepime hydrochloride?

Direct answer: Financial trajectory is best modeled as stable-but-declining margin with period-to-period volume volatility. Overall revenue is typically resilient but compresses in profitability due to multi-source price competition.

Expected trajectory elements

  • Revenue: stable with patient admission and infection incidence; declines are more likely when stewardship shifts prescribing away or when competitive tendering forces lower pricing.
  • Gross margin: downward drift driven by generic competition and contract compression.
  • Working capital: inventory management matters due to supply cycle and distributor practices in injectable antibiotics.

Key proxy metrics

  • Quarterly US hospital purchasing data by unit volume (doses, grams) and average net price
  • Distributor inventory levels and restocking cycles
  • Tender award dates and contract duration

What settlement or litigation risks affect cefepime hydrochloride commercialization?

Direct answer: For cefepime, ongoing litigation is not typically the dominant commercialization risk given the mature generic environment, but individual product litigation (ANDA-specific) can influence which sponsor’s product is stocked under specific contracts.

Practical litigation pathways

  • Paragraph IV ANDA challenges historically drove shifts in exclusivity for certain product presentations, but for a molecule with extensive generic coverage, the effect is usually localized and time-bound.

Which jurisdictions matter most for cefepime hydrochloride revenue exposure?

Direct answer: US acute-care procurement plus EU hospital tenders are primary. Emerging markets can add volume growth but with higher procurement volatility and pricing pressure.

Jurisdiction-level commercial realities

  • US: GPO and hospital contract structure drives rapid substitution across multi-source products.
  • EU: tender-based procurement and national reimbursement rules create localized pricing and volume patterns.
  • Emerging markets: tenders and distributor channel conditions can create sharper demand swings and higher risk from logistics disruptions.

What manufacturing and regulatory factors influence cefepime hydrochloride supply and sales?

Direct answer: Sterility assurance, aseptic fill-finish, beta-lactam contamination control, and quality system performance determine delivery reliability in a market where customers can switch suppliers quickly.

Regulatory exposure points

  • Facility inspection outcomes for sterile injectables
  • Batch release timelines
  • Changes to manufacturing sites or process parameters requiring comparability and regulatory documentation

Sales impact

  • Any supply constraint can cause temporary unit price improvement, but contract dynamics often reassign volume to alternative suppliers once supply normalizes.

How do product presentation choices (strength, packaging, administration form) affect sales?

Direct answer: Cefepime hydrochloride sales concentrate on standardized injectable strengths and packaging that match hospital dosing workflows and inventory management.

Presentation drivers

  • Availability of vial sizes and package configuration that reduce waste and improve dosing flexibility
  • Clear renal dosing guidance to support stewardship and pharmacy workflow
  • Distribution robustness through major wholesalers

Commercial outcome

  • Even when active ingredient is the same, presentation fit can drive “stickiness” in hospital inventories, influencing unit share during contract cycles.

Key Takeaways

  • Cefepime hydrochloride is a mature, multi-source hospital antibiotic with commodity-like commercialization characteristics.
  • Demand is tied to empiric and targeted treatment of acute Gram-negative infections and hospital-acquired infection pathways, creating volume sensitivity to admission and infection incidence.
  • Revenue is primarily determined by tender and contract outcomes rather than sustained pricing power; margin typically erodes as generic competition intensifies.
  • IP-driven barriers are generally less meaningful at the molecule level; practical differentiation is often product-specific and operational.
  • The dominant business risks are procurement-based substitution, contract re-awards, and sterile injectable supply disruptions that can temporarily move pricing and volume.

FAQs

1) What are the main indications that drive cefepime hydrochloride use in hospitals?
Empiric and targeted treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections, including hospital-acquired infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia (where applicable by labeling), bloodstream infections, and complicated urinary/soft tissue infections depending on approved labeling in each jurisdiction.

2) Why does cefepime revenue fluctuate even when patient incidence is stable?
Quarterly results often reflect contract re-awards, distributor inventory swings, and temporary supply constraints that alter purchasing patterns independent of underlying infection incidence.

3) How does renal dosing guidance affect utilization and formulary acceptance?
Renal dosing clarity supports safe stewardship and pharmacy workflow. Products that integrate practical renal dosing administration guidance can face fewer operational pushbacks.

4) Does cefepime compete more with carbapenems or with other cephalosporins?
Cefepime typically competes across broad-spectrum Gram-negative options; the strongest competitive pressure tends to come from the class of agents favored in local stewardship protocols, which can include piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems depending on resistance patterns.

5) What tends to be the biggest driver of market share for cefepime manufacturers?
Contract wins under GPO and hospital tenders, combined with reliable supply, distribution reach, and unit economics for pharmacy purchasing teams.


References (APA)

(No source citations were provided in the prompt; therefore no references are listed.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.