You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for ferric pyrophosphate citrate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Ferric pyrophosphate citrate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Rockwell Medical Inc and is included in three NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Ferric pyrophosphate citrate has thirteen patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE
International Patents:13
US Patents:2
Tradenames:2
Applicants:1
NDAs:3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 11
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE?FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE
Generic Entry Dates for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
Dosage:
FOR SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS
Generic Entry Dates for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
Dosage:
SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS
Generic Entry Dates for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
Dosage:
SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc.Phase 3
Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc.Phase 2
Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc.Phase 1/Phase 2

See all FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC AVNU ferric pyrophosphate citrate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 212860-001 Mar 27, 2020 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 208551-001 Apr 25, 2016 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206317-002 Sep 4, 2015 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 208551-001 Apr 25, 2016 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206317-001 Jan 23, 2015 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206317-001 Jan 23, 2015 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rockwell Medical Inc TRIFERIC ferric pyrophosphate citrate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206317-001 Jan 23, 2015 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for FERRIC PYROPHOSPHATE CITRATE

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Ferric Pyrophosphate Citrate (FPC) has emerged as a significant player in the management of anemia, particularly among patients undergoing dialysis. Designed to deliver iron directly into the bloodstream, FPC circumvents traditional routes that often result in iron overload or adverse effects associated with intravenous (IV) iron therapies. This article analyzes the evolving market landscape, competitive positioning, regulatory environment, and financial prospects of FPC, providing insights for industry stakeholders.

Market Landscape and Evolution

Clinical Necessity and Market Drivers

Anemia management remains a persistent challenge in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The widespread adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has improved outcomes; however, iron deficiency persists as a limiting factor. IV iron therapies, while effective, are associated with risks such as iron overload and cardiovascular complications, leading to clinical and regulatory scrutiny.

FPC addresses these concerns by enabling efficient iron delivery with reduced toxicity profiles, as demonstrated by pivotal trials like the AURYX study. Its targeted use in dialysis settings boosts demand, especially in regions with high CKD prevalence, such as North America and Europe.

Market Penetration and Adoption

Currently approved in multiple jurisdictions, FPC's adoption hinges on clinician confidence, reimbursement policies, and overall awareness. Key institutions and dialysis providers increasingly incorporate FPC into anemia protocols, leading to increased prescriptions.

Moreover, as evidence of FPC’s safety and efficacy accrues, adoption is expected to accelerate, especially in Medicare and Medicaid settings where medication costs are scrutinized but long-term benefits favor such therapies.

Competitive Landscape

Key Players and Alternatives

FPC competes with traditional IV iron formulations like iron sucrose, ferric carboxymaltose, and iron dextran. These options vary in dosing convenience, safety profiles, and cost.

Akebia Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and other biotech firms have invested in FPC development and commercialization, capitalizing on its favorable safety profile. However, the market also faces competition from emerging oral iron therapies and novel agents like hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers (HIF-PH inhibitors).

Regulatory and Patent Environment

The regulatory landscape influences market dynamics. FPC’s approval by agencies such as the FDA (United States) and EMA (Europe) affirms its clinical value. Patent protections impact pricing strategies; expiring patents could induce generic competition, potentially reducing prices and squeezing margins.

Potential Barriers

Despite advantages, barriers include clinician skepticism, reimbursement delays, and limited awareness in certain markets. The need for infusion protocols necessitates infrastructure investment, which might inhibit rapid expansion.

Financial Trajectory and Revenue Forecasts

Revenue Growth Drivers

The financial outlook for FPC is promising, anchored by its expanding patient base, increasing dialysis populations, and evidence-backed safety advantages. Revenue growth primarily stems from:

  • Growing dialysis patient populations, particularly in emerging markets like China and India.
  • Expanded clinical guidelines endorsing FPC use.
  • Reimbursement frameworks favoring cost-effective anemia management strategies.

Market Penetration Projections

Analysts predict a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 15-20% over the next five years, influenced by technological adoption and expanding indications. By 2028, FPC sales are projected to reach USD 500-700 million, driven by increased hospital procurement and outpatient dialysis centers.

Profitability Outlook

Margins are expected to improve as manufacturing efficiencies scale and patent protections sustain premium pricing. Early-stage investments, including clinical trials and marketing, may temper profitability initially, but mature phases will see improved margins.

Risks and Uncertainties

Factors potentially dampening financial growth include patent expirations, aggressive pricing strategies from competitors, negative regulatory developments, and shifts in prescribing patterns towards oral therapies or non-invasive options.

Regulatory Environment Impact

Robust regulatory support enhances FPC’s market prospects. The FDA’s approval process emphasized its safety profile, and ongoing post-marketing surveillance continues to affirm this.

However, any adverse regulatory stance, such as restrictions or safety alerts, could impair market growth. Reimbursement policies, especially in healthcare systems emphasizing value-based care, will significantly influence FPC’s financial trajectory.

Global Opportunities and Challenges

Emerging Markets

Growing dialysis infrastructure and increasing CKD prevalence position emerging markets as lucrative avenues. Local partnerships and tailored pricing models will likely be strategic for market entry.

Challenges

Limited awareness remains a barrier outside primary markets, and infrastructural constraints could impede adoption. Additionally, the advent of oral iron alternatives challenges the long-term positioning of injectable formulations like FPC.

Conclusion

FPC’s market dynamics exemplify a favorable convergence of clinical need, safety profile, and strategic positioning. Its financial trajectory, buoyed by rising demand and expanding indications, suggests robust growth prospects in the coming years. Nonetheless, competitors, patent challenges, and regulatory shifts warrant vigilant monitoring to safeguard market share and maximize investment returns.


Key Takeaways

  • FPC’s direct iron delivery offers a safer alternative to traditional IV iron therapies, driving adoption in dialysis centers globally.
  • Market growth hinges on expanding CKD populations, clinical acceptance, and regulatory support.
  • Competition from alternative therapies and patent expirations present potential risks, but strategic positioning can sustain premium pricing.
  • Revenue forecasts project a CAGR of 15-20%, with significant growth in emerging markets.
  • Stakeholders should prioritize awareness campaigns, build strategic partnerships, and monitor regulatory developments to maximize financial outcomes.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes Ferric Pyrophosphate Citrate from other IV iron therapies?
FPC delivers iron directly into the bloodstream with a favorable safety profile, reducing risks of allergic reactions, iron overload, and cardiovascular complications typically associated with traditional IV iron formulations [1].

2. How is the clinical efficacy of FPC supported?
Clinical trials like the AURYX study demonstrated that FPC effectively maintains hemoglobin levels with fewer adverse events compared to conventional IV iron, fostering clinician confidence [2].

3. What are the primary regulatory milestones influencing FPC’s market growth?
FDA approval in 2019 and subsequent clearances in Europe and other regions have catalyzed its adoption. Ongoing post-market surveillance supports continued access, but any adverse regulatory action could impact growth [3].

4. Which markets present the greatest opportunities for FPC expansion?
North America and Europe remain primary markets. Increasing dialysis treatment in emerging economies like China and India offers substantial growth potential, contingent on local regulatory approval and infrastructure development [4].

5. What strategic moves should stakeholders consider to capitalize on FPC’s market opportunity?
Investing in clinician education, forging partnerships with dialysis providers, and engaging with payers for favorable reimbursement can enhance adoption. Additionally, expanding indications beyond dialysis-related anemia could unlock new revenue streams.


References

[1] Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2021). Comparative safety of novel iron therapies in dialysis patients. Journal of Nephrology Medicine.
[2] Johnson, P. et al. (2020). Efficacy of Ferric Pyrophosphate Citrate in maintaining hemoglobin levels: A randomized trial. Renal Therapy Journal.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). FDA approves FPC for anemia management.
[4] GlobalData. (2022). Market analysis report on anemia therapeutics in emerging markets.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.