Last Updated: September 24, 2026

EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Apotex and Gilead Sciences Inc, and is included in two NDAs. There are two patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

One supplier is listed for this compound.

Recent Clinical Trials for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Gilead SciencesPhase 3

See all EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
ODEFSEY Tablets emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate 200 mg/25 mg/ 25 mg 208351 3 2019-11-05

US Patents and Regulatory Information for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Gilead Sciences Inc ODEFSEY emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 208351-001 Mar 1, 2016 RX Yes Yes 8,754,065*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Gilead Sciences Inc ODEFSEY emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 208351-001 Mar 1, 2016 RX Yes Yes 9,296,769*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Apotex EMTRICITABINE, RILPIVIRINE, AND TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE emtricitabine; rilpivirine hydrochloride; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 214095-001 Jan 30, 2026 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

International Patents for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3639 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 087546 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2012296622 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2014271320 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112014003420 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2845553 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for EMTRICITABINE; RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1663240 2015/052 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: A COMBINATION OF RILPIVIRINE OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT OF RILPIVIRINE, INCLUDING THE HYDROCHLORIDE SALT OF RILPIVIRINE, AND EMTRICITABINE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/11/737/001-002 20111128
1663240 300851 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: COMBINATIE VAN: - RILPIVIRINE OF EEN THERAPEUTISCH EQUIVALENTE VORM DAARVAN ZOALS BESCHERMD DOOR HET BASISOCTROOI, ZOALS EEN FARMACEUTISCH AANVAARDBAAR ZOUT VAN RILPIVIRINE, WAARONDER HET HYDROCHLORIDEZOUT VAN RILPIVIRINE; - EMTRICITABINE; EN - TENOFOVIRALAFENAMIDE OF EEN FARMACEUTISCH AANVAARDBAAR ZOUT DAARVAN, IN HET BIJZONDER TENOFOVIRALAFENAMIDEFUMARAAT; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/16/1112 20160623
3808743 CA 2022 00035 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: A COMBINATION OF RILPIVIRINE OR A THERAPEUTICALLY EQUIVALENT FORM THEREOF PROTECTED BY THE BASIC PATENT, SUCH AS A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE ADDITION SALT OF RILPIVIRINE, INCLUDING THE HYDROCHLORIC ACID SALT OF RILPIVIRINE, AND EMTRICITABINE; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/11/737/001-002 20111128
1663240 1690062-3 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: A COMBINATION OF: RILPIVIRINE OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT OF RILPIVIRINE, INCLUDING THE HYDROCHLORIDE SALT OF RILPIVIRINE; EMTRICITABINE; AND TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE, OR A PHARMCEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF, INCLUDING TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE.; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/16/1112 20160623
0582455 08C0021 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: EFAVIRENZ; EMTRICITABINE; TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/07/430/001 20071213
0915894 08C0020 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: EFAVIRENZ; EMTRICITABINE; TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/07/430/001 20071213
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine Hydrochloride and Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate: Market Dynamics, Patent Exclusivity and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: September 5, 2026

Odefsey, the fixed-dose combination of emtricitabine, rilpivirine hydrochloride and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, is a mature Gilead Sciences HIV product with annual sales near or above $1 billion. Its commercial position is supported by once-daily dosing, a lower tenofovir exposure profile than older tenofovir disoproxil fumarate products, and use in virologically suppressed patients. The principal risks are internal cannibalization by Biktarvy, declining demand for older single-tablet regimens, and eventual generic entry after the remaining composition and formulation patents expire.

What drug is protected by the Odefsey patent estate?

Odefsey combines three antiretroviral agents:

Component Pharmacologic class Commercial role
Emtricitabine Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor Backbone agent
Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate Nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor Lower-systemic-exposure tenofovir prodrug
Rilpivirine hydrochloride Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor Non-nucleoside third agent

Gilead launched Odefsey in the United States in March 2016 after FDA approval for HIV-1 treatment in patients weighing at least 35 kilograms who were virologically suppressed on a stable antiretroviral regimen and had no history of treatment failure or resistance to the product’s components [1].

The product’s differentiation is clinical rather than mechanistic. Odefsey is a successor to Complera, which combined emtricitabine, rilpivirine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Replacing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with tenofovir alafenamide was intended to reduce systemic tenofovir exposure and improve renal and bone safety markers.

When does Odefsey lose exclusivity?

Odefsey’s regulatory exclusivity expired before its principal patent protection. The commercial constraint is therefore patent-based rather than FDA exclusivity-based.

Protection category Approximate status
FDA approval March 1, 2016
New chemical entity exclusivity Not applicable to the already known active ingredients
Three-year clinical-investigation exclusivity Expired in 2019
Primary product protection Extends into the early 2030s through tenofovir alafenamide-related patents
Earlier rilpivirine protection Generally expires earlier, in the late 2020s
Generic competition More likely after expiration or invalidation of the later combination and tenofovir alafenamide patents

The key commercial date is not the expiration of rilpivirine or emtricitabine patents in isolation. A generic applicant must address the patents listed for the specific Odefsey product, including composition, formulation and method-of-use claims.

Gilead’s patent portfolio for tenofovir alafenamide includes U.S. Patent No. 9,393,208, which has been associated with tenofovir alafenamide composition protection and an expiration date in 2032, subject to statutory adjustments and any applicable patent-term restoration. The Orange Book must be reviewed for the current listed patents, expiration dates and use codes because FDA listings can change over time [2].

What patents protect emtricitabine, rilpivirine and tenofovir alafenamide?

The estate has several layers rather than one controlling patent.

Tenofovir alafenamide patents

Tenofovir alafenamide is the strongest remaining protection layer. Gilead developed the compound as a successor prodrug to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Patents covering tenofovir alafenamide, fumarate forms, pharmaceutical compositions and combinations with other antiretrovirals provide the main barrier to early Odefsey substitution.

These patents also support Gilead’s broader HIV portfolio, including Descovy, Genvoya and Biktarvy. The shared technology creates both scale benefits and a legal limitation: invalidation of a core tenofovir alafenamide patent could affect several products simultaneously.

Rilpivirine patents

Rilpivirine originated in the Janssen pharmaceutical business. Earlier patents covering rilpivirine and its hydrochloride form have expiration dates before the latest tenofovir alafenamide patents. Rilpivirine protection therefore has less influence on the ultimate Odefsey loss-of-exclusivity date than the newer tenofovir alafenamide and combination patents.

Rilpivirine’s commercial value is also limited by its clinical restrictions. The drug requires administration with a meal, has a lower resistance barrier than integrase inhibitors, and is unsuitable for patients with high baseline viral loads in certain treatment settings.

Combination and formulation patents

Odefsey may be protected by claims directed to:

  • Fixed-dose combinations containing emtricitabine, rilpivirine and tenofovir alafenamide.
  • Tablet compositions and excipient systems.
  • Specific dosage strengths.
  • Methods of treating HIV-1 in virologically suppressed patients.
  • Use in patients switching from another stable antiretroviral regimen.
  • Manufacturing processes and crystalline or salt forms.

Formulation patents can delay an exact-copy generic even after an active-ingredient patent expires. Their value depends on claim breadth, Orange Book listing status and whether an ANDA applicant can certify that it will market a non-infringing formulation.

What is the Orange Book status of Odefsey?

Odefsey is an FDA-approved small-molecule combination product listed in the Orange Book. It is not a biologic and does not have a Purple Book biosimilar pathway.

An ANDA applicant seeking approval for a generic Odefsey equivalent would generally need to file Paragraph IV certifications against unexpired listed patents or wait until the relevant patents expire. A Paragraph IV notice could trigger patent litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act and impose a potential 30-month stay of final FDA approval, subject to statutory exceptions and court actions [3].

The practical entry date depends on four events:

  1. The ANDA applicant’s filing date.
  2. The patents identified in its Paragraph IV certification.
  3. Whether Gilead sues within the statutory period.
  4. Whether the patents survive invalidity and non-infringement challenges.

No biosimilar litigation is relevant because all three Odefsey ingredients are chemically synthesized small molecules.

Which companies are challenging Odefsey exclusivity?

Generic pharmaceutical companies that routinely challenge Gilead HIV products include Teva, Viatris, Sandoz, Lupin, Cipla and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories. Publicly disclosed challenges must be distinguished from routine Orange Book certifications because a certification does not establish that an ANDA has received FDA approval or that commercial launch is imminent.

The competitive pathway is likely to develop in stages:

Period Expected market event
Before 2027 Limited direct generic threat if later Odefsey patents remain enforceable
Late 2020s Greater potential for rilpivirine-related and older combination challenges
Early 2030s Highest probability of full Odefsey generic entry if tenofovir alafenamide patents remain intact
Post-entry Rapid price erosion, formulary substitution and reduced branded share

An authorized generic is also possible. Gilead could license a generic manufacturer or launch a company-authorized version to retain supply-chain control and capture part of the post-exclusivity market.

What is the financial trajectory for Odefsey?

Odefsey has moved from growth product to mature franchise asset. Its revenue trajectory reflects both strong retention among stable patients and substitution by newer integrase inhibitor-based regimens.

Approximate Gilead-reported U.S. and international product sales have followed this pattern:

Fiscal year Odefsey sales trend
2020 Approximately $1.1 billion
2021 Approximately $1.3 billion
2022 Approximately $1.3 billion
2023 Approximately $1.2 billion
2024 Approximately $1.1 billion

Gilead’s annual reports identify Odefsey as part of the company’s HIV product portfolio and report product-level sales alongside Biktarvy, Descovy, Genvoya and Triumeq [4-8]. Reported totals can vary by geographic presentation, foreign-exchange effects and product classification.

The revenue profile has three defining characteristics:

High cash generation

Odefsey has already absorbed most development and launch costs. Manufacturing is established, the product is distributed globally, and the fixed-dose tablet requires no complex biologic production. Gross margins are therefore materially higher than during the launch period.

Gradual erosion rather than immediate collapse

Odefsey is prescribed to patients who are stable and virologically suppressed. Physicians may avoid switching such patients absent a clinical or economic reason. That creates persistence and slows the decline caused by Biktarvy substitution.

Portfolio cannibalization

Biktarvy is Gilead’s main growth product in HIV. Its bictegravir-based regimen has a high resistance barrier and strong treatment positioning. Gilead benefits from retaining patients within its portfolio, but Biktarvy growth reduces the long-term addressable population for Odefsey.

How does Odefsey compare with Biktarvy and Descovy?

Product Active ingredients Main positioning Relative commercial risk
Odefsey Emtricitabine, rilpivirine, TAF Single-tablet regimen for selected suppressed patients Mature product; exposed to Biktarvy switching and future generics
Biktarvy Bictegravir, emtricitabine, TAF Broadly used integrase inhibitor regimen Gilead’s strongest HIV growth and revenue product
Descovy Emtricitabine, TAF HIV treatment backbone and pre-exposure prophylaxis Larger addressable market and multiple indications
Genvoya Elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, TAF Earlier TAF-based single-tablet regimen More exposed to aging and switching
Complera Emtricitabine, rilpivirine, TDF Predecessor to Odefsey Mostly legacy demand

Biktarvy has the strongest competitive position because integrase inhibitor regimens have become the preferred initial treatment class in major guidelines. Odefsey remains relevant for patients who are already suppressed, prefer a non-integrase regimen, or have specific treatment-history considerations.

Descovy has broader strategic importance because TAF is used across HIV treatment and prevention markets. This gives Gilead a larger platform around TAF than Odefsey alone.

What licensing deals affect Odefsey?

Odefsey reflects a Gilead-Janssen commercial relationship. Janssen contributed rilpivirine, while Gilead supplied emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide and commercialized the fixed-dose product. Earlier products containing rilpivirine, including Complera and Eviplera, were developed through Gilead and Janssen collaboration arrangements.

The economics of such arrangements can include royalties, profit sharing or regional commercialization rights. The exact financial terms are generally not disclosed at the individual-product level in Gilead’s public filings. Investors should therefore treat Odefsey revenue as a Gilead product-sales metric rather than as a direct measure of Gilead’s net retained profit.

What litigation and settlement risks affect generic launch?

The principal legal risks are standard Hatch-Waxman risks:

  • Paragraph IV invalidity challenges against TAF composition patents.
  • Non-infringement claims directed to fixed-dose tablet patents.
  • Challenges to method-of-use patents through skinny-label strategies.
  • Disputes over whether a patent is properly listed in the Orange Book.
  • Settlements that permit an earlier launch before the nominal patent expiration date.

A settlement could produce a launch date materially earlier than 2032 while preserving Gilead’s patent rights against other generic applicants. The commercial outcome would depend on whether the first filer receives 180-day generic exclusivity and whether multiple challengers enter simultaneously.

What generic entry risks exist for Odefsey?

The likely launch scenarios are:

Scenario Commercial effect
No challenge until late patent life Odefsey retains substantial branded revenue through the early 2030s
Single first-filer settlement Controlled erosion after an agreed entry date
Multiple successful Paragraph IV challenges Earlier and sharper price decline
TAF patent invalidation Accelerated risk across Odefsey, Descovy and Genvoya
Authorized generic launch Lower net price but partial retention of Gilead economics

Once multiple generics enter, branded HIV products can experience significant volume loss. However, payer substitution may be slower than in acute-care markets because clinicians and patients place high value on continuity of virologic suppression.

How strong is the Odefsey patent estate?

The estate is moderate to strong through the early 2030s, principally because the commercial product incorporates the newer TAF prodrug. Its strength is reduced by three factors:

  1. The active ingredients are individually well known.
  2. Earlier rilpivirine and emtricitabine protection expires sooner.
  3. Generic applicants can design around certain formulation and method-of-use claims.

The strongest legal assets are likely the composition and combination patents tied to TAF. The weakest assets are narrow formulation claims and method-of-use claims that can be avoided through alternative labeling or tablet design.

Key Takeaways

  • Odefsey is a mature, billion-dollar HIV product marketed by Gilead Sciences.
  • Its principal commercial value comes from durable patient retention and established use in virologically suppressed patients.
  • Biktarvy is the main internal competitor and the primary source of long-term cannibalization.
  • The product has no biosimilar risk because it is a small-molecule combination.
  • Earlier emtricitabine and rilpivirine protections are less important than TAF composition and combination patents.
  • The most important remaining patent protection extends into the early 2030s, subject to Orange Book changes, patent-term adjustments and litigation.
  • A Paragraph IV challenge could move generic entry forward, but the timing would depend on litigation and settlement outcomes.
  • TAF patent invalidation would have consequences beyond Odefsey because Descovy and Genvoya also depend on the same technology platform.
  • Revenue is likely to decline gradually before generic entry and more sharply after multiple generic suppliers enter.

FAQs

Is Odefsey still a major Gilead product?

Yes. Odefsey remains a significant HIV product with annual sales around $1 billion, although Biktarvy has become Gilead’s principal HIV growth driver.

Is there a generic version of Odefsey?

A fully substitutable generic Odefsey product has not become a major commercial competitor. Generic entry depends on ANDA approvals, Orange Book patent certifications and resolution of any Hatch-Waxman litigation.

Does Odefsey have biosimilar competition?

No. Odefsey contains chemically synthesized small molecules. Competition proceeds through the ANDA generic-drug pathway, not the biosimilar pathway.

Can a generic omit rilpivirine and still compete with Odefsey?

A product that omits rilpivirine would not be an Odefsey-equivalent generic. It could compete therapeutically as a different antiretroviral regimen but would not receive an AB rating to Odefsey.

What is the biggest financial risk to Odefsey?

The largest risk is cumulative portfolio substitution by Biktarvy before full patent expiry, followed by rapid price erosion if a generic applicant successfully challenges the remaining TAF-related patents.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2016). Odefsey prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations, Orange Book. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations-orange-book
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Abbreviated new drug application and patent certification provisions. https://www.fda.gov/drugs
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (2021). 2020 annual report. https://investors.gilead.com
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (2022). 2021 annual report. https://investors.gilead.com
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (2023). 2022 annual report. https://investors.gilead.com
  7. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (2024). 2023 annual report. https://investors.gilead.com
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (2025). 2024 annual report. https://investors.gilead.com

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.