Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CEPHRADINE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for CEPHRADINE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:6
Applicants:8
NDAs:15
Drug Master File Entries: 10
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Patent Applications: 8,255
DailyMed Link:CEPHRADINE at DailyMed
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for CEPHRADINE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CEPHRADINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline ANSPOR cephradine FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 061866-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Barr CEPHRADINE cephradine FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 062859-001 May 19, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Apothecon VELOSEF cephradine INJECTABLE;INJECTION 061976-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Apothecon VELOSEF cephradine INJECTABLE;INJECTION 061976-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Apothecon VELOSEF cephradine CAPSULE;ORAL 061764-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Vitarine CEPHRADINE cephradine CAPSULE;ORAL 062813-001 Feb 25, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Apothecon VELOSEF cephradine INJECTABLE;INJECTION 061976-005 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Cephradine: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is cephradine’s commercial footprint in key markets?

Cephradine (often spelled “cephradine”) is an older, first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic. Commercial availability is concentrated in legacy, generic channels rather than branded, high-R&D pipeline dynamics.

Primary market reality

  • Low current pricing power typical of older off-patent antibiotics.
  • Competitive pressure from newer cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and broad generic penetration in hospital formularies.
  • Usage tied to narrow clinical and stewardship pathways, which limits addressable volume versus newer agents.

Commercial structure

  • Generic-dominant supply: cephradine products generally trade as multi-source generics where at least one strong manufacturing footprint exists.
  • Tender-driven hospital purchasing: procurement prices reset around the lowest compliant generic offers and logistics costs.
  • Formulary volatility: infections treated with cephalosporins face stewardship substitution to other classes when local antibiograms shift or when stewardship committees tighten targets.

How do market dynamics shape demand for cephradine?

Demand dynamics for older antibiotics are governed less by marketing and more by institutional policy, resistance patterns, and procurement economics.

Market drivers

  1. Antibiotic stewardship constraints

    • Hospitals use formulary categories and pre-authorization rules to steer prescribing toward guideline-favored options.
    • Older cephalosporins often lose share when stewardship prioritizes broader-spectrum or inhibitor-protected regimens.
  2. Clinical substitution

    • Cephalosporin selection shifts with local resistance, especially for Gram-negative coverage needs.
    • When infection patterns require broader coverage, clinicians tend to switch away from earlier-generation options.
  3. Procurement and tender mechanics

    • Hospital tenders drive rapid price compression when multiple generics compete.
    • Stock-outs or quality deviations can temporarily shift volume, but typically reverse when supply normalizes.

Market headwinds

  • Reduced clinical positioning vs newer cephalosporins across many settings.
  • Higher relative risk under stewardship: older agents can face tighter restrictions.
  • Regulatory and quality compliance costs for legacy molecules when manufacturing bases must upgrade facilities to maintain supply continuity.

What is the financial trajectory for cephradine (sales path and profitability profile)?

Cephradine’s financial trajectory follows the classic life cycle of mature, off-patent small-molecule antibiotics: volume may persist, but revenue and margin steadily erode as generic competition expands and pricing falls.

Expected trajectory pattern (industry life-cycle logic)

  • Revenue trend: gradual decline in unit revenue as competition intensifies, with occasional stabilization during tender cycles.
  • Volume trend: stable-to-declining depending on the persistence of older protocols and regional formularies.
  • Gross margin trend: pressured downward as price competition increases and compliance and logistics costs rise.

Profitability profile

  • Low to mid-single-digit gross margins are typical for multi-source antibiotic generics, with net margins affected by:
    • marketing spend (often minimal outside sales logistics),
    • tender bid costs,
    • inventory working capital volatility around procurement windows,
    • regulatory and batch-release overheads.

Commercial sensitivity

Cephradine is highly sensitive to:

  • tender pricing cycles (quarterly resets are common),
  • supply continuity and batch acceptance (loss of volume after quality issues is durable even after remediation),
  • formulary status changes (institution-specific restrictions can cut usage quickly).

How do patent and exclusivity dynamics affect the economics?

Cephradine is not positioned as a modern, long-duration IP asset; its economics are anchored in generic market structure.

IP effect on pricing power

  • After brand exclusivity ends, pricing power collapses as multiple generic manufacturers enter.
  • New IP-led growth is not available for mature antibiotics unless line extensions or formulation-specific rights exist in specific jurisdictions, which do not typically sustain premium pricing across global hospital systems.

Lifecycle constraints

  • If cephradine continues to be sold, it does so as legacy therapy with cost competition as the main determinant of who wins hospital share.

What does the competitive landscape imply for market share?

Cephradine competes in a segment where:

  • pharmacists and hospital committees often select from a small set of formulary antibiotics,
  • procurement consolidates across contracted vendors.

Competitive implications

  • Multi-source generics drive price-to-penetrate behavior during tenders.
  • Brands rarely sustain share unless they have:
    • superior supply reliability,
    • better negotiated purchasing terms,
    • or special formulary placement.

Where does cephradine fit within payer and hospital decision-making?

Cephradine usage depends on:

  • hospital prescribing pathways (empiric choices and de-escalation),
  • antibiogram outcomes (resistance patterns),
  • treatment guidelines at the institution and region level,
  • cost-per-treated-episode rather than drug-level marketing.

Decision behavior

  • If stewardship rules favor alternative cephalosporins or inhibitor combinations, cephradine volume declines even if it remains clinically acceptable in some cases.
  • If cost pressure is intense and cephradine meets guideline thresholds for certain indications, it can retain baseline demand.

What financial outcomes should investors model for cephradine producers?

For a cephradine manufacturer, the financial model should assume:

  • price erosion driven by multi-source competition,
  • volume dependence on tender awards and supply continuity,
  • margin compression linked to logistics, compliance, and batch-release costs,
  • limited upside from switching the product mix unless new formulations or market access changes occur.

Scenario structure for a generic cephalosporin

A practical way to frame outcomes:

  • Base case: stable unit volumes with falling net price; modest net margin if supply is consistent.
  • Downside: tender price reset plus formulary restriction leads to volume decline and revenue compression.
  • Upside: supply dominance in a procurement cycle drives temporary volume growth, offsetting some price erosion.

Key takeaways

  • Cephradine operates as a mature, generic antibiotic, with demand governed by stewardship, formularies, and tender pricing rather than brand-led growth.
  • The market dynamics favor multi-source price compression, reducing revenue stability and eroding profitability over time.
  • Financial trajectory is expected to follow an off-patent life cycle: revenue pressure, margin compression, and volume sensitivity to procurement cycles and institutional policy.

FAQs

  1. Is cephradine currently a branded-growth story?
    No. Market economics are consistent with generic, hospital-tender driven demand.

  2. What determines whether cephradine wins hospital share?
    Tender pricing, supply continuity, and whether institutional guidelines and antibiograms support its use.

  3. How does stewardship affect cephradine demand?
    It can restrict prescribing and shift usage toward other beta-lactams or inhibitor combinations, reducing utilization even when generics remain available.

  4. What is the likely impact of new generic entries?
    It accelerates price erosion and typically compresses margins unless a manufacturer maintains procurement advantage and quality performance.

  5. What should producers prioritize financially?
    Tender execution, batch reliability, regulatory compliance, and cost control to defend net price and maintain supply coverage.


References

[1] WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index. World Health Organization. https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Medicine information and product-related regulatory data (search results for cephradine). https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug product and labeling information (search results for cephradine). https://www.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.