Last Updated: August 9, 2026

ATRACURIUM BESYLATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for atracurium besylate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Atracurium besylate is the generic ingredient in four branded drugs marketed by Baxter Hlthcare, Baxter Hlthcare Corp, Eugia Pharma, Hikma, Hospira, Hospira Inc, Meitheal, Pharmobedient, Teva Parenteral, Watson Pharms Teva, and Watson Labs Inc, and is included in twenty-three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are sixteen drug master file entries for atracurium besylate. Three suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for ATRACURIUM BESYLATE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:4
Applicants:11
NDAs:23
Drug Master File Entries: 16
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 16
Patent Applications: 1,609
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in ATRACURIUM BESYLATE?ATRACURIUM BESYLATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:ATRACURIUM BESYLATE at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for ATRACURIUM BESYLATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Fayoum University HospitalNA
Ain Shams UniversityNA
Tanta UniversityN/A

See all ATRACURIUM BESYLATE clinical trials

Pharmacology for ATRACURIUM BESYLATE
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for ATRACURIUM BESYLATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ATRACURIUM BESYLATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare ATRACURIUM BESYLATE PRESERVATIVE FREE atracurium besylate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074825-001 Sep 30, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hikma ATRACURIUM BESYLATE PRESERVATIVE FREE atracurium besylate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074900-001 Jul 18, 1997 AP RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Parenteral ATRACURIUM BESYLATE atracurium besylate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074784-001 Jun 11, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 27, 2026

ATRACURIUM BESYLATE market dynamics and financial trajectory: what drives price, demand, and manufacturer revenue as generic pressure rises

Atracurium besylate is an injectable neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) used to produce skeletal muscle relaxation during surgery and mechanical ventilation. The market is dominated by generic supply, with pricing pressure driven by formulary contracting, tenders, and the absence of meaningful differentiation once patents and exclusivities end. Financial trajectory across the branded-to-generic transition typically shows: (1) steep post-exclusivity price erosion, (2) slower revenue decline in volume markets where supply is fragmented or restricted by procurement contracts, and (3) concentrated share outcomes among a small number of low-cost manufacturers with reliable FDA supply.

What is atracurium besylate used for, and where does revenue come from (surgery vs ICU ventilation)?

Primary indications

  • Skeletal muscle relaxation to facilitate surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia.
  • Skeletal muscle relaxation in intubated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) where NMBA is used as part of ventilation management.

Commercial revenue channels

  • Hospital procurement (group purchasing organizations, GPO bids, IDNs).
  • Contract pharmacies and distribution to hospitals via wholesaler networks.
  • Direct institutional purchasing (tender-based ordering in certain geographies).

Demand drivers

  • Surgical volumes: elective and inpatient procedure throughput.
  • ICU bed occupancy and ventilation practices, including sedation plus NMBA protocols.
  • Substitution patterns within NMBA classes (nondepolarizing agents).
  • Supply reliability and price competitiveness, since NMBA products are typically bought on cost and availability.

How does atracurium besylate compete with rocuronium, vecuronium, and cisatracurium on procurement?

Competitive positioning

  • Atracurium besylate is generally viewed as a clinically established option within NMBAs.
  • Cisatracurium is a common substitute in some formularies, and rocuronium is widely used in many settings due to familiarity and protocols.
  • Procurement decisions often hinge on institutional protocols, drug shortages, and per-dose economics rather than brand-level marketing.

Procurement outcome

  • Where formularies include multiple NMBAs, hospitals shift volume to lowest-cost suppliers subject to supply continuity.
  • Where atracurium is included as an alternative, demand can be resilient to competitor pricing moves but remains exposed to generic cost compression.

What market dynamics shape pricing and supply for atracurium besylate in the US and other key regions?

Key market structure

  • NMBA markets are high-utilization but price-sensitive.
  • Generic entry increases SKU count and forces downward ASPs through contracting.

Pricing mechanics

  • Hospital ASPs track wholesale acquisition cost erosion and bid outcomes.
  • Shortages of specific NMBA SKUs can temporarily stabilize or lift pricing for the affected product until supply normalizes.
  • Competitive substitution accelerates price resets after supply constraints ease.

Supply-side mechanics

  • Parenteral sterile injectables require tight manufacturing controls and batch release performance.
  • Fragmented suppliers improve resilience; fewer suppliers elevate shortage risk, which can cause temporary pricing spikes.

How do drug shortages and sterile injectable supply cycles affect atracurium besylate revenue?

  • Sterile injectable markets periodically face production disruptions due to facility constraints, raw material availability, or batch failures.
  • When atracurium besylate supply tightens, distributors and hospitals rebid, and utilization migrates back to “available” NMBAs.
  • Revenue can swing: volume may be lost if supply cannot meet demand; price may partially offset during constrained supply windows.

How does the branded-to-generic transition change the financial trajectory for atracurium besylate?

Typical trajectory pattern

  1. Pre-generic era: branded revenues supported by exclusivity and contracting inertia.
  2. Post-exclusivity: multiple generics enter; ASP falls, but total volume may hold or rise due to lower prices and broader adoption.
  3. Mature generic era: margins narrow; winners are those with lowest landed cost, consistent supply, and efficient manufacturing.

Net effect on revenue

  • Revenue often declines in nominal terms after peak branded sales due to ASP erosion.
  • Volume growth can slow the decline, but generics usually cannot preserve branded economics.

What financial indicators matter most for atracurium besylate suppliers?

  • Net sales from hospital procurement contracts (timing and bid cycles).
  • Gross margin compression as price declines.
  • Backlog and fill rates during supply disruptions.
  • Market share stability versus competitor substitution.
  • Working capital and inventory management, since sterile injectables have shelf-life and batch release constraints.

When do generics typically take over, and what is the exclusivity and patent risk profile?

A complete exclusivity and patent expiration timeline for atracurium besylate requires the specific US Orange Book listings, patent numbers, listed exclusivities, and the relevant NDA/ANDA holders. Without that dataset, the timing and risk profile cannot be stated accurately.

What patent and litigation events typically influence atracurium besylate commercialization?

For atracurium besylate, litigation risk is primarily tied to:

  • Orange Book-listed patents covering formulation, manufacturing, or method-of-use (if any).
  • Generic filing strategies and Paragraph IV challenges (where applicable).
  • Settlement agreements affecting launch dates and authorized generics.

A complete litigation map requires case numbers, district courts, and docket outcomes for specific ANDAs and listed patents.

What is the Orange Book status of atracurium besylate (NDA/ANDA, listed patents, exclusivities)?

Orange Book status is product-specific (NDA vs ANDA entries, strength of listing, and exclusivity type). Without the exact Orange Book extract for atracurium besylate, the number of listed patents, their expiration dates, and exclusivity windows cannot be enumerated.

How many generic manufacturers cover atracurium besylate, and which brands control share?

At the market level, atracurium besylate has historically been a generic commodity with multiple suppliers. Share concentration typically follows:

  • Lowest-cost, high-availability suppliers.
  • Manufacturers with strong sterile manufacturing track records.
  • Distribution strength and contract leverage with GPOs and IDNs.

A precise competitor ranking by market share and authorized product set requires the current national billing/volume data and up-to-date product catalog coverage.

What generic entry risks exist for atracurium besylate (pricing, supply, regulatory, and switching)?

Pricing risks

  • Post-entry ASP declines to contracted benchmarks.
  • Rapid price undercutting by additional entrants reduces profitability.

Supply and regulatory risks

  • Sterile injectable manufacturing failures can trigger backorders and lost contract volume.
  • Batch release delays can shift utilization to substitute NMBA SKUs, permanently in some hospital networks.

Switching risks

  • Hospitals may keep switching costs low by maintaining multiple NMBA options on formulary.
  • If atracurium is treated as an alternative, competitors can displace it quickly during shortage rebounds.

How does atracurium besylate compare commercially with cisatracurium and rocuronium (demand stability and pricing exposure)?

Commercial differences

  • Rocuronium is often treated as a default NMBA in many protocols, which can create higher baseline demand but also strong competitive pressure from generics.
  • Cisatracurium can have formulary advantages in certain patient populations and protocols, depending on institutional preferences.
  • Atracurium’s commercial trajectory depends on protocol fit and formulary inclusion as an alternative NMBA.

Net commercial outcome

  • Atracurium typically experiences less pricing resilience than protocol-default molecules because substitution is straightforward when other NMBA SKUs are available.

What formulations and presentation formats affect revenue (mg/mL, vial sizes, dilution needs)?

Atracurium besylate revenue is influenced by:

  • Unit dose formats (vial sizes) matching anesthesia workflows.
  • Per-dose cost under hospital contracts.
  • Compatibility in infusion workflows when applicable to institutional administration practices.

A detailed presentation-level revenue profile requires product-specific NDC-level sales data.

Key financial trajectory takeaways for atracurium besylate suppliers

  • Atracurium besylate is a mature injectable NMBA category where pricing is contract-driven and sensitive to generic supply conditions.
  • Revenue tends to follow a branded peak, then a steep decline after generic adoption, followed by low-growth or flat nominal revenue if volume offsets ASP compression.
  • The main short-term P&L drivers are supply reliability and procurement rebid timing. In sterile injectables, fill rate and batch performance often matter as much as list price.
  • Competitive substitution with rocuronium and cisatracurium creates ongoing demand volatility when specific NMBA SKUs face shortages or protocol shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • Atracurium besylate market economics are dominated by generic competition, hospital contracting, and supply continuity.
  • Financial trajectory is typically characterized by ASP erosion after exclusivity and margin pressure that only partial-volume growth can offset.
  • Revenue stability is most sensitive to procurement cycle timing and sterile manufacturing performance, including interruption risk.
  • Share is likely to concentrate among suppliers with the lowest landed cost and consistent supply reliability.
  • Patent and Orange Book timelines, litigation outcomes, and exact competitor rankings require Orange Book and docket-level datasets for this specific product entry set.

FAQs

  1. How do GPO contracts change atracurium besylate net pricing vs wholesale pricing?
  2. What hospital formulary rules typically determine whether atracurium besylate is used as first-line vs backup NMBA?
  3. How often do NMBA sterile injectable shortages shift demand between atracurium, cisatracurium, and rocuronium?
  4. What is the impact of vial size assortment on hospital switching decisions for atracurium besylate?
  5. How do manufacturing disruptions in sterile injectables propagate into distributor allocation and downstream revenue for NMBA suppliers?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Drugs @FDA. (Accessed 2026-07-27).
  2. FDA Drug Shortages. (Accessed 2026-07-27).
  3. FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER): Labeling and product information for atracurium besylate. (Accessed 2026-07-27).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.