Last Updated: May 10, 2026

AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium is the generic ingredient in nine branded drugs marketed by Aurobindo Pharma, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Cipla, Deva Holding As, Hikma Pharms, Micro Labs, Micro Labs Ltd India, Sandoz, Sandoz Inc, Sun Pharm Inds Ltd, Teva, Us Antibiotics, Chartwell Rx, Apotex Inc, and Teva Pharms Usa, and is included in forty-nine NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Thirty-three suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM
Recent Clinical Trials for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Cairo UniversityPHASE3
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityN/A
Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd.Phase 2

See all AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM clinical trials

Pharmacology for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
AUGMENTIN XR Extended-release Tablets amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium 1000 mg/62.5 mg 050785 1 2009-01-21

US Patents and Regulatory Information for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Us Antibiotics AUGMENTIN XR amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 050785-001 Sep 25, 2002 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Pharms Usa AMOXICILLIN AND CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET;ORAL 065096-001 Oct 29, 2002 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hikma Pharms AMOXICILLIN AND CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 065191-001 Jan 25, 2005 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Sun Pharm Inds Ltd AMOXICILLIN AND CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 065132-001 Mar 19, 2003 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for AMOXICILLIN; CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Us Antibiotics AUGMENTIN XR amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 050785-001 Sep 25, 2002 6,878,386 ⤷  Start Trial
Us Antibiotics AUGMENTIN XR amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 050785-001 Sep 25, 2002 6,746,692 ⤷  Start Trial
Us Antibiotics AUGMENTIN XR amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 050785-001 Sep 25, 2002 7,217,430 ⤷  Start Trial
Us Antibiotics AUGMENTIN XR amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 050785-001 Sep 25, 2002 7,250,176 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Amoxicillin; Clavulanate Potassium: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is the market structure for amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium?

Amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium is a mature, high-volume oral and injectable combination antibiotic built on a stable payer and hospital purchasing base. Commercial dynamics are shaped by (1) patent expiry and broad generic penetration, (2) procurement-led pricing in institutional channels, and (3) product differentiation concentrated in dosage forms, strengths, and formulation claims rather than novel MoAs.

Demand drivers

  • Hospital and outpatient infections portfolio: Amoxicillin; clavulanate is positioned for common bacterial infections where beta-lactamase production is a known risk.
  • Formulary inertia: Once included on hospital formularies, switching costs are limited to comparable efficacy and safety, supporting recurring demand even as unit prices compress.
  • Seasonal and respiratory cycle effects: Antibiotic utilization increases around peak respiratory infection periods, which supports intermittent volume spikes but does not structurally reverse pricing pressure.

Supply and pricing forces

  • Generic dominance: The combination is widely available, pushing pricing toward marginal-cost dynamics with intermittent premiumization for specific formulations.
  • Procurement leverage: Institutional buyers (GPOs, large hospital systems, national formularies) negotiate on total spend, favoring the lowest compliant acquisition cost at scale.
  • Regulatory and quality-driven sourcing: Market share shifts often track supply continuity and quality performance as much as list pricing.

How have financial economics evolved as the product moved into generic-heavy competition?

Financial performance for this combination historically follows a pattern typical of mature antibiotics: revenue growth is volume-led while margin compresses through price erosion. The earnings model is less about innovation-driven pricing and more about sustaining share via (1) contract procurement, (2) stable supply, and (3) minimizing manufacturing and logistics costs.

Revenue trajectory (high-level market mechanics)

  • Growth: Usually tracks utilization and demographic volume rather than drug-level price expansion.
  • Margin: Compresses with increasing generic competition, particularly where multiple AB-rated products compete within the same strengths and dosage forms.
  • Cash flow: Tends to be robust in established manufacturers due to scale, but reported profitability can swing with input costs and competitive contracting cycles.

Pricing and spend behavior by channel

  • Institutional: Spend follows contract renewals and GPO bids; short-term price reductions are common when additional suppliers enter or when contracts rebid.
  • Retail/outpatient: Pricing pressure shows up as pharmacy reimbursement and wholesaler discounting rather than rapid retail sticker-price changes.

Where do the revenue pools concentrate: oral tablets/suspensions or injectables?

For amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium, the revenue base usually concentrates in oral formulations due to broader outpatient use and more stable prescribing patterns. Injectables matter for hospital care pathways and inpatient infection management, but they generally carry more procurement scrutiny and tighter substitution among comparable inpatient antibiotics.

Product differentiation that moves volumes

  • Strength coverage: Multiple strengths support dosing flexibility and formulary alignment.
  • Dosage form availability: Tablets vs suspensions influence pediatric and adherence-driven prescribing.
  • Manufacturing reliability: For high-volume antibiotics, uninterrupted supply can outweigh minor pricing differences at the contract level.

What do prescribing and safety labeling dynamics imply for steady-state demand?

Prescribing behavior is constrained by established safety labeling and clinical guidance. The combination has long-standing clinical use, which anchors demand. At the same time, antibiotic stewardship programs and beta-lactam allergy screening reduce unrestricted growth.

Core clinical constraints shaping utilization

  • Appropriate use for bacterial indications: Stewardship limits broad off-label prescribing.
  • Tolerability and GI events: Common adverse effects can influence prescriber preference among competing options.
  • Beta-lactam allergy: Screening and contraindication logic prevents substitution into some patient segments.

How does competitive entry change unit economics in the long run?

Competitive entry typically reduces net price faster than it reduces volume, because hospital and payer procurement systems optimize for lowest-cost clinically equivalent products. Over time, that leads to:

  • Lower net revenue per unit
  • Higher reliance on scale
  • More frequent contract win/loss cycles
  • Less room for premium positioning unless formulation differentiation is contractually accepted

What is the observed regulatory and lifecycle posture for amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium?

The drug is a long-market product. For investors and R&D strategists, the key lifecycle implication is that value creation tends to come from line extensions and formulation manufacturing, not from breakthrough mechanism changes.

Lifecycle reality

  • Patent islands are limited in mature antibiotics where the active combination is established and generics can match the essential pharmacology.
  • Commercial strategy shifts to improved formulation attributes, supply resilience, and negotiating leverage in public and private procurement.

How should financial trajectory be modeled for a manufacturer or investor?

A workable model for amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium should emphasize:

  1. Unit demand stability (utilization-based)
  2. Net price decline curves (generic penetration and contract re-bids)
  3. Mix effects (dosage forms and strengths with better contract terms)
  4. Manufacturing margin resilience (cost of goods and yield)
  5. Working capital and distribution economics (inventory turns and rebate structures)

A practical way to structure forecast ranges

  • Base case: Flat to low single-digit volume growth offset by low-to-mid single-digit net price declines depending on competitive intensity.
  • Downside: Rapid contract erosion or supply constraints in a key strength, creating broader substitution shifts and accelerating price compression.
  • Upside: Successful contract retention or favorable mix into strengths/dosage forms with slightly better net pricing.

Where are the highest-probability growth levers in a generic-heavy market?

The highest-probability levers are operational and commercial, not discovery-driven:

  • Contract execution: Winning rebid cycles and maintaining formulary listing
  • Supply reliability: Avoiding stockouts and meeting procurement service-level requirements
  • Line expansion within the same combination: Adding strengths, optimizing packaging, and aligning to payer preference
  • Cost-down manufacturing: Yield improvement and input cost management

What external market factors can move financial outcomes quickly?

Amoxicillin; clavulanate is exposed to macro and policy factors that influence antibiotic procurement and reimbursement:

  • Antibiotic stewardship initiatives: Can dampen utilization growth and shift selection toward narrower options in some pathways.
  • Hospital budget cycles: Procurement intensity can increase during budget tightening, accelerating price pressure.
  • Supply chain volatility: API and excipient availability and logistics can swing margins.

How does this drug’s long-term trajectory compare to other antibiotic classes?

Compared with newer branded antibiotics, amoxicillin; clavulanate has a structurally different financial profile:

  • Lower pricing power due to generic competition
  • Higher baseline volume due to entrenched clinical use
  • Better resilience in demand because it is not typically dependent on premium payer coverage or biomarker-linked therapy selection

For investors focused on financial trajectory, the implication is that the asset behaves more like a manufacturing and contracting platform than a technology platform.

Key Takeaways

  • Amoxicillin; clavulanate potassium is a mature, high-volume antibiotic with generic-heavy market structure and procurement-led pricing.
  • Financial trajectory is typically volume-stable with margin compression, driven by contract re-bids and net price erosion.
  • Revenue pools concentrate mainly in oral formulations, with injectables mattering for hospital utilization but subject to tighter substitution and contracting leverage.
  • The most actionable levers for profitability are contract win rates, supply reliability, mix into favorable strengths, and cost-of-goods discipline.
  • Demand is constrained by antibiotic stewardship and clinical safety labeling, but it remains resilient because of entrenched prescribing patterns.

FAQs

1) Is the market dominated by generics?

Yes. Competition from multiple generic equivalents drives net price toward procurement-benchmark levels, with differentiation focused on formulation and contracting execution rather than novel mechanism.

2) What most strongly determines net revenue for the combination?

Net price at the point of sale (driven by hospital and payer contracts) and unit volume (driven by infection incidence and prescribing volumes).

3) Do injectables provide meaningful upside?

They can help mix and hospital share, but profitability is usually governed by contract pricing and substitution among inpatient antibiotics.

4) What are the main risks to earnings?

Faster-than-expected contract price erosion, supply interruptions that force substitution, and cost inflation in manufacturing inputs.

5) Is R&D likely to create brand-like pricing power?

For this combination, R&D value creation is more likely to come from formulation and operational improvements than breakthrough innovation that supports premium pricing.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium drug label information. FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.