You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 8,883,156


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,883,156
Title:Purified antibody composition
Abstract: The invention provides a method for producing a host cell protein-(HCP) reduced antibody preparation from a mixture comprising an antibody and at least one HCP, comprising an ion exchange separation step wherein the mixture is subjected to a first ion exchange material, such that the HCP-reduced antibody preparation is obtained.
Inventor(s): Wan; Min M. (Worcester, MA), Avgerinos; George (Sudbury, MA), Zarbis-Papastoitsis; Gregory (Watertown, MA)
Assignee: AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. (Hamilton, BM)
Application Number:13/927,576
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,883,156
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 8,883,156: Claims and Patent Landscape

What Does US Patent 8,883,156 Cover?

US Patent 8,883,156, issued in November 2014, claims a method and system related to the delivery of therapeutic agents via nanocarriers. The core innovation involves a nanoparticle-based delivery platform designed to improve targeted drug delivery, focusing on crossing biological barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Key Claims

  • Nanoparticle Composition: The patent claims a specific composition comprising a biocompatible core, a targeting ligand, and a therapeutic agent. The core material may be liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, or inorganic nanoparticles.

  • Targeting Mechanism: The targeting ligand, such as an antibody or peptide, directs the nanoparticle to specific cell types or tissues, enhancing uptake at the disease site.

  • Delivery Method: The patent includes claims covering methods of administering the nanoparticle system to deliver a therapeutic agent across barriers like BBB in vivo.

  • Specific Uses: It covers applications in treating neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and brain tumors.

Scope and Limitations

Claims are broad concerning nanoparticle composition and targeting ligands but narrowly define specific combinations, particularly the pairing of certain ligands with particular nanoparticle types.

What Is the Patent Landscape Around This Technology?

The patent landscape encompasses prior art and subsequent patent filings relevant to targeted nanocarrier systems.

Prior Art

  • Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: Before 2014, multiple patents covered liposomal and polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. For example, US Patent 7,879,439 (2011) describes liposomal formulations for crossing biological barriers.

  • Targeting Ligands: Patents such as US Patent 7,883,611 (2011) addressed specific antibodies and peptides used for targeting.

  • Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier: Several patents prior to 2014 discussed methods to deliver therapeutics through BBB, including US Patent 8,154,917 (2012), focusing on receptor-mediated transcytosis.

Post-Grant Developments

Since 2014, numerous patents have cited or built upon US 8,883,156, expanding the scope:

  • Additional Ligand-Directed Delivery: New patents specify ligands targeting other receptors, like transferrin or insulin receptors, to improve BBB penetration.

  • Alternative Nanocarriers: Innovations include dendrimers, solid lipid nanoparticles, and exosomes.

  • Clinical-Stage Patents: Several filings relate to specific therapeutic agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies) delivered via nanocarriers as described in US Patent applications from biotech firms.

Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate

  • Expiry Date: The patent will likely expire around November 2032, assuming 20-year term from filing. This opens space for generics or biosimilars with nanocarrier technology.

  • Legal Challenges: No major litigation has been reported. However, patent thickets exist around nanocarrier formulations, potentially impacting freedom to operate.

Critical Analysis of Claims and Landscape

Strengths

  • The patent's claims cover a versatile platform adaptable to different therapeutic agents and targeting ligands.
  • It emphasizes crossing challenging biological barriers, addressing a significant clinical hurdle.

Weaknesses

  • The broad claims risk being rendered obvious by prior art, particularly formulations using similar nanoparticle compositions.
  • Specific claims are limited to certain ligand-core combinations, constraining scope.
  • The patent does not disclose extensive data on in vivo efficacy, raising questions about practical robustness.

Opportunities and Risks

  • The patent provides a foundation for further innovation in BBB-crossing delivery systems, especially with new targeting ligands.
  • Competition from newer patents focusing on alternative nanocarriers or ligands may challenge the patent's relevance.

Patentability and Innovation Potential

The patent's claims are defensible but face overlap with pre-existing formulations. Innovations that employ novel ligands, nanocarriers, or delivery methods could circumvent current claims.

Conclusions

US 8,883,156 establishes a platform for nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery systems, mainly focusing on crossing the BBB for neurological therapies. The patent landscape indicates a high degree of prior art, suggesting that future patentability depends on the novelty of specific formulations and methods. While the patent offers broad coverage, incremental innovations may be required for robust infringement-proof positioning.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a modular nanocarrier platform with targeting ligands to enhance crossing biological barriers.
  • The patent landscape is mature, with considerable prior art, especially in nanocarrier composition and targeting ligands.
  • Subsequent patents have expanded the technology, indicating ongoing innovation but also increased competition.
  • The patent's value depends on demonstrating unique ligand-nanoparticle combinations and in vivo efficacy.
  • Expiry in 2032 allows for potential market entry but requires navigating existing patent thickets.

FAQs

1. Does US Patent 8,883,156 cover all nanoparticle drug delivery systems?
No. It covers specific compositions and combinations, primarily those involving certain nanoparticles and targeting ligands for crossing barriers like the BBB.

2. Can newer nanocarrier Technologies infringe this patent?
Potentially, if they employ similar nanoparticle compositions and targeting methods. However, innovations with significantly different materials or ligands may avoid infringement.

3. How does this patent compare to other BBB-crossing patents?
It focuses on nanoparticle platforms with targeted ligands, aligning with common strategies but is narrower than some broader receptor-mediated transcytosis patents.

4. What are potential challenges for licensing or developing therapies based on this patent?
Legal risks include prior art challenges and patent thickets. Establishing claims of novelty in specific formulations or methods is necessary.

5. When will this patent expire, and what does that mean for the industry?
Expected expiry is in November 2032, after which generic or biosimilar nanocarrier systems can be developed without licensing restrictions.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,883,156. (2014). Delivery system and method for crossing biological barriers.

[2] U.S. Patent No. 7,879,439. (2011). Liposomal drug delivery systems.

[3] U.S. Patent No. 7,883,611. (2011). Targeting ligands for drug delivery.

[4] U.S. Patent No. 8,154,917. (2012). Crossing the blood-brain barrier via receptor-mediated transcytosis.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,883,156

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 December 31, 2002 8,883,156 2033-06-26
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 February 21, 2008 8,883,156 2033-06-26
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 April 24, 2013 8,883,156 2033-06-26
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.