Last Updated: April 23, 2026

Patent: 8,809,562


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,809,562
Title:Use of metallocene compounds for cancer treatment
Abstract: Metallocene compounds and pharmaceutical compositions containing these metallocene compounds are disclosed and described. Methods of treating cancer employing such metallocene compounds and pharmaceutical compositions also are provided.
Inventor(s): Hlavinka; Mark L. (Bartlesville, OK), Yang; Qing (Bartlesville, OK), Murph; Mandi Michelle (Watkinsville, GA)
Assignee: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP (The Woodlands, TX)
Application Number:13/488,490
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive Analysis of US Patent 8,809,562: Claims and Patent Landscape

What Does US Patent 8,809,562 Cover?

US Patent 8,809,562, granted on August 26, 2014, is titled "Methods of treating or preventing neurodegenerative diseases." It covers methods involving the administration of certain compounds, specifically kinase inhibitors, for reducing neurodegeneration.

Patent Scope and Claims

The patent contains 22 claims, primarily focused on:

  • Methods of administering kinase inhibitors to treat, prevent, or slow neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
  • Specific compounds and compositions, with an emphasis on inhibitors targeting the mixed lineage kinase (MLK) family, particularly MLK3.
  • Dosage regimens, including dosing frequency and administration routes.

Core Claims Breakdown

  • Claim 1: A method involving administering a therapeutically effective amount of an MLK3 inhibitor to a patient to reduce neurodegeneration.
  • Claims 2-10: Variations detailing specific MLK3 inhibitors, dosing schedules, and patient conditions.
  • Claims 11-22: Cover different pharmaceutical compositions, combinations with other therapeutic agents, and methods tailored for specific neurodegenerative diseases.

Critical Analysis of the Claims

Strengths

  • Early claim on MLK3 inhibitors aligns with ongoing research; thus, it holds importance for neurodegeneration treatments.
  • Broad claim coverage allows for various kinase inhibitors, increasing commercialization pathways.
  • Inclusion of combination therapies reflects current drug development trends.

Weaknesses and Limitations

  • Many claims are functional and lack structural details about the inhibitors, potentially limiting enforceability if prior art exists.
  • The scope depends heavily on the definition of "therapeutically effective amount," which is inherently variable.
  • The patent does not specify the efficacy or safety profiles, leaving questions about clinical viability.

Potential Areas of Challenge

  • Prior art in kinase inhibition for neurodegenerative diseases; patents or publications prior to the filing date (2010) could threaten validity.
  • Ambiguity in "reducing" versus "treating" may lead to narrow interpretation under patent law jurisdiction.
  • The breadth of compounds claimed may be challenged for lack of written description or enablement if detailed synthesis methods are not provided.

Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents and Competitors

  • Patent US 8,941,220: Assigned to Genentech, focusing on other kinase inhibitors for neurodegeneration.
  • US Patent Application 20130028442: Focuses on specific MLK inhibitors; filed two years prior to 8,809,562.
  • Patent families from pharmaceutical companies: Merck, Novartis, and Lilly have filed patents covering kinase inhibitors for neurodegenerative conditions, with overlaps in compound classes and methods.

Overlap and Novelty

  • The claims of US 8,809,562 intersect with existing kinase inhibitor patents but distinguish based on specific compound structures and therapeutic applications.
  • The patent's novelty hinges on the claimed specific MLK3 inhibitors and their application to neurodegeneration, which was emerging around 2010-2014.
  • The patent landscape shows a crowded field, with multiple filings attempting to monopolize this therapeutic approach.

Key Jurisdictional Considerations

  • Patent validity considerations include jurisdiction-specific prior art searches, particularly in Europe, Japan, and China, where kinase inhibitor research is intense.
  • The potential for patent challenges exists in opposition proceedings, especially if prior art can be advanced regarding kinase inhibitors' use in neurodegeneration.

Commercial and Research Implications

  • The patent covers a promising but complex therapeutic pathway; drugs developed could face patent challenges but also offers licensing opportunities.
  • Current research trends favor multiple kinase inhibitor strategies, broadening the scope for patent infringement or design-around strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • US 8,809,562 provides broad protection for MLK3-targeted kinase inhibitors for neurodegenerative diseases, with claims that may face validity challenges due to prior art.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on demonstrating patentable novelty and non-obviousness amid pervasive kinase inhibitor research.
  • The patent landscape in this domain is dense, with significant overlap, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis before commercialization.
  • The claims' scope spanning different compounds, schedules, and diseases offers multiple vectors for licensing or defending patents.
  • The strategic value of this patent hinges on clinical efficacy data, which is not detailed within the patent, complicating valuation.

5 FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic target in US 8,809,562?
A1: The patent targets MLK3 kinase inhibitors for treating neurodegenerative diseases.

Q2: Does the patent specify particular chemical structures?
A2: The patent claims include specific chemical inhibitors but are broad, covering classes of MLK3 inhibitors without detailed structures.

Q3: How vulnerable is the patent to prior art challenges?
A3: Its broad claims and reliance on functional language could be challenged if prior kinase inhibitor patents or publications pre-date the filing.

Q4: Which neurodegenerative diseases are targeted?
A4: Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and ALS are explicitly mentioned.

Q5: How does this patent fit into the current landscape?
A5: It exists amid intense competition with multiple patents on kinase inhibitors, emphasizing the importance of detailed patent landscaping and freedom-to-operate analysis.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). US Patent 8,809,562. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8809562

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,809,562

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Merck Teknika Llc TICE BCG bcg live For Injection 102821 June 21, 1989 8,809,562 2032-06-05
Genentech, Inc. RITUXAN rituximab Injection 103705 November 26, 1997 8,809,562 2032-06-05
Idec Pharmaceuticals Corp. RITUXAN rituximab Injection 103737 February 19, 2002 8,809,562 2032-06-05
Genentech, Inc. HERCEPTIN trastuzumab For Injection 103792 September 25, 1998 8,809,562 2032-06-05
Genentech, Inc. HERCEPTIN trastuzumab For Injection 103792 February 10, 2017 8,809,562 2032-06-05
Genzyme Corporation CAMPATH alemtuzumab Injection 103948 May 07, 2001 8,809,562 2032-06-05
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.