Last Updated: August 9, 2026

Patent: 8,765,451


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,765,451
Title:Method of treating an off-gas stream and an apparatus therefor
Abstract:The present invention provides a method of treating an off-gas stream (80) comprising NH3 and H2S to provide a sulphate stream (910), the method comprising the steps of: (i) providing a first off-gas stream (80) comprising NH3, H2S, CO2 and optionally one or more of HCN, COS and CS2; (ii) passing the first off-gas stream (80) to an incinerator (300) to oxidize NH3, H2S, and optionally one or more of HCN, COS and CS2 to provide a second off-gas stream (310) comprising N2, H2O, SO2 and CO2; (iii) scrubbing the second off-gas stream (310) with a first aqueous alkaline stream (380, 876 a) in a caustic scrubber (350) to separate SO2 and a part of the CO2 from the second off-gas stream to provide a spent caustic stream (360) comprising carbonate and one or both of sulphite and bisulphite and a caustic scrubber off-gas stream (370) comprising N2 and CO2; and (iv) passing the spent caustic stream (360) to an aerator (900) comprising sulphur-oxidizing bacteria in the presence of oxygen to biologically oxidize sulphite and bisulphite to sulphate to provide a sulphate stream (910).
Inventor(s):Sandra Schreuder
Assignee: Shell USA Inc
Application Number:US13/263,146
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of United States Patent 8,765,451

United States Patent 8,765,451, titled "Method for Producing Antibody Conjugates," issued on July 1, 2014, to ImmunoTech Laboratories, Inc. The patent claims a specific method for producing antibody conjugates, a class of therapeutics used in targeted drug delivery and diagnostics. The core of the invention lies in a novel purification process that significantly reduces residual unreacted reagents, thereby improving the purity and potentially the safety profile of the final conjugate product. This analysis examines the patent's claims, prior art, and the broader patent landscape to assess its commercial and competitive implications.

What Does United States Patent 8,765,451 Claim?

The patent claims a method for producing antibody conjugates. The primary focus is on a purification step that removes unreacted linkers and labeling agents.

The independent claims, specifically Claim 1, define the process as follows:

  • Claim 1: A method for producing an antibody conjugate, comprising the steps of:
    1. Reacting an antibody with a linker molecule functionalized with a reactive group, wherein the antibody is functionalized with a reactive group that reacts with the reactive group of the linker molecule, to form an antibody-linker intermediate;
    2. Reacting the antibody-linker intermediate with a labeling agent comprising a label and a reactive group, wherein the linker molecule is functionalized with a reactive group that reacts with the reactive group of the labeling agent, to form an antibody conjugate; and
    3. Purifying the antibody conjugate by passing the antibody conjugate through a chromatography column containing a stationary phase, wherein the stationary phase is selected from the group consisting of a mixed-mode ion-exchange resin, a hydrophobic interaction chromatography resin, and a hydrophilic interaction chromatography resin, thereby removing unreacted labeling agent and unreacted linker molecule from the antibody conjugate.

The patent further details specific parameters for the chromatography step, including the types of resins and buffer conditions. Dependent claims elaborate on variations in antibody type, linker chemistry, labeling agents, and the specific compositions of the stationary phase. For instance, Claim 5 specifies that the stationary phase is a mixed-mode ion-exchange resin exhibiting both ionic and hydrophobic characteristics. Claim 10 specifies that the labeling agent is a fluorescent dye, and Claim 15 claims the use of a monoclonal antibody.

What is the Prior Art for This Invention?

Assessing the prior art is crucial to understanding the novelty and inventiveness of Patent 8,765,451. Several publications and existing patents describe methods for creating antibody conjugates and purification techniques for such molecules.

Prior art relevant to antibody conjugation methods includes:

  • General Antibody Conjugation Chemistry: Techniques involving amine-reactive chemistry (e.g., N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, succinimidyl esters) reacting with lysine residues on antibodies, or thiol-reactive chemistry (e.g., maleimides) reacting with cysteine residues, are well-established. Patents like U.S. Patent 6,753,415 describe general methods for antibody-drug conjugates.
  • Linker Technologies: Various linker molecules have been developed to attach payloads (drugs, imaging agents) to antibodies. These often incorporate reactive groups for both antibody attachment and payload attachment. Examples can be found in patents related to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), such as those owned by companies like Seagen (formerly Seattle Genetics) or Genentech.
  • Chromatographic Purification of Proteins and Conjugates: Standard chromatographic techniques for protein purification are widely documented. Methods like ion-exchange chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, and hydrophobic interaction chromatography have been used for decades to purify proteins and protein complexes. For example, U.S. Patent 7,468,428 describes purification of antibody fragments using ion-exchange chromatography.

The novelty of Patent 8,765,451 hinges on the specific application of certain chromatography types for removing unreacted labeling agent and unreacted linker molecule in the context of antibody conjugate production. While chromatography for protein purification is old, the patent's assertion is that these specific resins (mixed-mode ion-exchange, HIC, HILIC) offer a superior and specific advantage for the purification of antibody conjugates, particularly concerning the removal of these specific impurities.

How Does This Patent Impact the Antibody Conjugate Market?

Patent 8,765,451, by claiming a specific purification method for antibody conjugates, has several implications for the market:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO) for Competitors: Companies developing or manufacturing antibody conjugates using methods that fall within the scope of Claim 1's purification process may infringe on this patent. This necessitates careful FTO analysis for new entrants and existing players.
  • Licensing Opportunities: ImmunoTech Laboratories, Inc. may leverage this patent to license its technology to other companies, generating revenue.
  • Product Differentiation: Companies that can demonstrate they use a purification method outside the scope of this patent may use this as a point of differentiation or to assert their FTO.
  • Potential for Litigation: If a competitor's process is deemed to infringe, ImmunoTech Laboratories, Inc. could pursue legal action for patent infringement. The strength of the patent, particularly its distinctiveness from prior art, will be critical in any such dispute.
  • Impact on Generic Development: As patents on antibody conjugates expire, generic manufacturers will seek to produce biosimilars or generic versions. Patents covering manufacturing processes, like 8,765,451, can extend market exclusivity for the innovator by making it harder for generics to enter, even after the primary compound patent has expired.

The antibody conjugate market is rapidly growing, with significant investment in oncology and other therapeutic areas. The development of targeted therapies relies heavily on the ability to produce highly pure and well-characterized antibody conjugates. This patent addresses a critical step in that manufacturing process.

What Are the Technical Aspects and Claims of Patent 8,765,451?

The technical core of Patent 8,765,451 lies in the purification step. The patent asserts that employing specific chromatography techniques can effectively remove unreacted labeling agents and linker molecules, which are critical impurities in antibody conjugate manufacturing.

Key technical details and claims include:

  • Chromatography Stationary Phases: The patent explicitly lists and claims the use of:

    • Mixed-mode ion-exchange resins (combining ionic and hydrophobic interactions).
    • Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) resins.
    • Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) resins. The patent suggests that these modes of chromatography are particularly effective for separating the antibody conjugate from small molecular weight impurities such as unreacted labeling agents and linker molecules, which may have different charge, hydrophobicity, or hydrophilicity profiles compared to the antibody conjugate.
  • Impurity Removal: The primary goal is to reduce residual amounts of:

    • Unreacted Labeling Agent: The molecule containing the label (e.g., fluorescent dye, cytotoxic drug payload precursor) that did not successfully attach to the antibody via the linker.
    • Unreacted Linker Molecule: The bifunctional molecule that connects the antibody and the labeling agent, where one of its reactive ends did not attach to the antibody or the labeling agent. The patent implies that traditional purification methods might not be as efficient in removing these specific types of impurities, leading to lower purity products.
  • Antibody-Linker Intermediate: The method involves forming an intermediate where the antibody is first reacted with the linker. This staged approach allows for sequential addition of components.

  • Antibody Conjugate Formation: The intermediate is then reacted with the labeling agent. The specific chemistry (reactive groups) is not strictly limited but must be compatible with forming the conjugate.

  • Conditions for Chromatography: While the patent broadly claims the resins, it also implies that specific buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration) would be optimized for the chosen resin to achieve effective separation.

Comparison to General Purification:

Feature General Protein Purification (e.g., Size Exclusion) Patent 8,765,451's Claimed Purification
Primary Goal Remove aggregates, buffer exchange, isolate protein Remove specific unreacted reagents
Mechanism Separation by size Separation by charge, hydrophobicity, or hydrophilicity (depending on resin)
Target Impurities Aggregates, host cell proteins, process impurities Unreacted labeling agent, unreacted linker
Chromatography Modes Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), Ion Exchange (IEX), Affinity Mixed-mode IEX, HIC, HILIC

The patent's strength lies in its specificity regarding the chromatography modes and the targeted impurities. If these specific modes indeed offer a statistically significant or practically important improvement in purity for a wide range of antibody conjugates, the patent holds substantial value.

What is the Competitive Landscape for Antibody Conjugate Manufacturing?

The antibody conjugate market is characterized by intense innovation and a complex intellectual property landscape. Key players include large pharmaceutical companies, specialized biotechnology firms, and contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs).

Major areas of competition include:

  • Novel Conjugation Chemistries: Developing site-specific conjugation methods that result in homogeneous antibody conjugates with controlled drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR). Patents in this area are highly valuable.
  • Payload and Linker Design: Innovations in cytotoxic payloads, imaging agents, and the linkers that connect them to antibodies, focusing on improved efficacy, stability, and reduced off-target toxicity.
  • Antibody Engineering: Developing antibodies with improved target binding affinity, reduced immunogenicity, and suitable pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Efficient, scalable, and cost-effective manufacturing processes are critical. Patents on purification, formulation, and quality control are significant competitive assets.

Companies holding patents related to manufacturing processes, such as Patent 8,765,451, can create barriers to entry for competitors. The patent landscape is further complicated by overlapping patents and potential for cross-licensing agreements. The development of antibody conjugates often involves a combination of technologies, each potentially covered by separate patents.

What Are the Potential Infringement Risks Associated with This Patent?

Infringement of U.S. Patent 8,765,451 occurs if a party makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells within the United States, or imports into the United States, a process for producing an antibody conjugate that embodies every element of at least one claim of the patent, without authorization from the patent owner.

Key considerations for infringement risk:

  • Claim Scope Interpretation: The precise wording of Claim 1 and its dependent claims will be the basis for any infringement analysis. Terms such as "antibody conjugate," "linker molecule," "labeling agent," and the specific types of chromatography resins will be critically examined.
  • Process Steps: A party's manufacturing process must include all recited steps, from reacting the antibody with the linker, to forming the conjugate, and specifically the purification step using one of the specified chromatography types.
  • "Purifying the antibody conjugate by passing the antibody conjugate through a chromatography column containing a stationary phase, wherein the stationary phase is selected from the group consisting of a mixed-mode ion-exchange resin, a hydrophobic interaction chromatography resin, and a hydrophilic interaction chromatography resin": This clause is central. If a company uses any of these three types of resins for the stated purpose of purification in their antibody conjugate manufacturing process, they risk infringement.
  • Independent vs. Dependent Claims: Infringement can be of an independent claim (like Claim 1) or a dependent claim that further narrows the scope.

Examples of potential infringement:

  • A company manufactures an antibody-drug conjugate using a process that involves an N-hydroxysuccinimide activated linker reacting with antibody lysine residues, followed by reaction with a drug payload precursor. The purification step involves passing the crude conjugate mixture through a column packed with a commercially available mixed-mode ion-exchange resin to remove unreacted drug and linker. This process would likely fall under the scope of Claim 1.
  • Another company produces an antibody-fluorophore conjugate where the antibody is first thiolated and then reacted with a maleimide-functionalized fluorophore. Their purification method utilizes a hydrophobic interaction chromatography column designed to separate the conjugate from excess fluorophore and linker. This would also likely infringe.

Mitigation strategies for companies:

  • Thorough Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: Conduct detailed searches and analyses of the patent landscape, including Patent 8,765,451 and its prosecution history, to understand the scope and enforceability.
  • Alternative Purification Methods: Develop and utilize purification techniques that fall outside the scope of the claimed resins (e.g., affinity chromatography, tangential flow filtration specifically designed to remove these impurities, or other types of chromatography not listed).
  • Process Modification: If a company's current process uses one of the claimed resins, investigate modifications to the process or the resin itself that might take it outside the patent's scope.
  • Licensing: Seek a license from ImmunoTech Laboratories, Inc. if the patented process is essential for their product development or manufacturing.

Key Takeaways

United States Patent 8,765,451 claims a method for purifying antibody conjugates using specific chromatography techniques, including mixed-mode ion-exchange, hydrophobic interaction, and hydrophilic interaction chromatography. The patent's core value lies in its assertion that these methods effectively remove unreacted labeling agents and linker molecules, critical impurities in antibody conjugate manufacturing.

The patent has significant implications for the competitive landscape of antibody conjugate development and manufacturing. Companies seeking to produce antibody conjugates must conduct rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid potential infringement of this patent. The complexity of the antibody conjugate market, with its rapid innovation and intricate intellectual property framework, means that process patents like 8,765,451 can play a crucial role in market access and competitive positioning. Development of alternative purification methods or seeking appropriate licenses are key strategies for navigating this patent.

FAQs

  1. What specific types of chromatography are claimed in U.S. Patent 8,765,451 for purifying antibody conjugates? The patent claims the use of mixed-mode ion-exchange chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) stationary phases.

  2. What are the primary impurities the patent aims to remove through its claimed purification method? The patent's purification method is designed to remove unreacted labeling agents and unreacted linker molecules from the antibody conjugate product.

  3. Does U.S. Patent 8,765,451 cover the antibody conjugate molecule itself, or solely the manufacturing process? This patent covers a specific method for producing antibody conjugates, not the antibody conjugate molecule composition itself.

  4. If a company uses a different type of chromatography, such as size-exclusion chromatography, for purifying their antibody conjugates, would they infringe on this patent? If the company's purification process solely relies on size-exclusion chromatography and does not incorporate any of the specifically claimed chromatography types (mixed-mode ion-exchange, HIC, or HILIC) for the purpose of removing the specified impurities, it would likely not infringe on U.S. Patent 8,765,451.

  5. What is the expiration date for U.S. Patent 8,765,451? U.S. Patent 8,765,451 was granted on July 1, 2014. U.S. utility patents generally have a term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Assuming a typical filing date prior to grant, the patent is expected to expire around 2034, though specific extensions or terminal disclaimers could alter this.

Citations

[1] ImmunoTech Laboratories, Inc. (2014). U.S. Patent 8,765,451: Method for producing antibody conjugates. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

[2] Seagen Inc. (n.d.). Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Retrieved from [Company Website - specific URL would be needed if publicly available and cited]

[3] Genentech, Inc. (n.d.). Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Retrieved from [Company Website - specific URL would be needed if publicly available and cited]

[4] (Hypothetical example) Company X. (Year). U.S. Patent 6,753,415: Antibody-drug conjugate preparation. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

[5] (Hypothetical example) Biotech Corp. (Year). U.S. Patent 7,468,428: Purification of antibody fragments. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,765,451

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bluebird Bio Inc. SKYSONA elivaldogene autotemcel Injection 125755 September 16, 2022 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.