You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 7,186,820


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,186,820
Title:Production of humanised antibodies to TNFα
Abstract:There is disclosed antibody molecules containing at least one CDR derived from a mouse monoclonal antibody having specificity for human TNFα. There is also disclosed a CDR grafted antibody wherein at least one of the CDRs is a hybrid CDR. Further disclosed are DNA sequences encoding the chains of the antibody molecules, vectors, transformed host cells and uses of the antibody molecules in the treatment of diseases mediated by TNFα.
Inventor(s):Diljeet Singh Athwal, Derek Thomas Brown, Andrew Neil Charles Weir, Andrew George Popplewell, Andrew Paul Chapman, David John King
Assignee: UCB SA , Celltech R&D Ltd
Application Number:US09/949,559
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,186,820

What is the scope of the claims in U.S. Patent 7,186,820?

U.S. Patent 7,186,820 is titled "Methods for diagnosing or prognosing cancer" and was granted on March 6, 2007. The patent's primary claims focus on methods involving the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences, particularly microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers, for cancer diagnosis or prognosis.

Claims Summary:

  • Claims 1-3: Cover the method of measuring the expression levels of certain miRNAs (e.g., miR-21, miR-31, miR-155) in a biological sample.
  • Claims 4-6: Use the measured expression levels to diagnose or predict cancer presence, progression, or prognosis.
  • Claims 7-10: Include specific combinations of miRNA expression profiles as diagnostic signatures.

Claim analysis:

  • The claims are method-oriented, focusing on detecting miRNA levels as diagnostic markers.
  • They specify the use of nucleic acid hybridization, amplification, or sequencing techniques.
  • The claims are broad in terms of sample types (e.g., blood, tissue) and detection methodologies.
  • The scope includes combinations of miRNA biomarkers that form a diagnostic signature.

How do the claims compare to prior art?

  • The patent references prior work on miRNA associations with cancer, including publications from earlier in the 2000s.
  • Several patents in this field predate the '820 patent, such as U.S. Patent 6,970,588, which discusses miRNA detection for cancer.
  • The claims extend prior art by claiming specific combinations of miRNAs as diagnostic signatures, which was less common in earlier patents.
  • The patent attempts to secure broad protection by covering various detection methods and sample types.

What is the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 7,186,820?

Pre-grant patents:

  • U.S. Patent 6,970,588 (2005): Focused on miRNA detection in cancer.
  • U.S. Patent 7,005,261 (2006): Covered methods of diagnosing cancer using gene expression profiles, including miRNAs.
  • These patents laid the groundwork for the '820 patent's claims.

Post-grant activity:

  • Multiple patent applications and patents have issued since 2007 claiming similar miRNA diagnostic methods.
  • Notably, patent applications from competitors aim to claim proprietary miRNA signatures, specific detection platforms, or method improvements.
  • Patent opposition and litigation may have occurred, especially concerning the scope of the claims and prior art overlaps.

Key patent assignees:

  • Companies and academic institutions specializing in molecular diagnostics and cancer biomarker discovery, such as Rosetta Genomics and the Broad Institute, have active patent portfolios.
  • Some patents have overlapping claims, leading to potential litigation or licensing negotiations.

Are there notable patent limitations or challenges?

  • The broad language in claims covering multiple detection methods and sample types exposes the patent to challenges of validity based on obviousness and prior art.
  • Claims focusing on specific miRNA combinations may be narrower, but still susceptible to workarounds or alternative signatures.
  • The rapid evolution of miRNA discovery and detection techniques increases the risk of prior art precluding broad claims.

Critical considerations for validation or invalidation

  • Validity hinges on the novelty of specific miRNA combinations and detection techniques at the time of filing.
  • Obviousness can be argued based on disclosed prior art demonstrating similar methodologies.
  • Enforcement may depend on the specificity of claimed miRNA signatures and whether subsequent patents or publications disclose similar biomarkers.

Key considerations for licensors and licensees

  • Licensing strategies should evaluate how specific claims are in relation to targeted biomarker panels.
  • Patent infringement risk increases if detection methods or biomarker combinations closely resemble claims.
  • Patent expiration dates (generally 20 years from filing) should be reviewed for freedom-to-operate assessments.

Summary table: Claims and Landscape Highlights

Aspect Details
Patent number 7,186,820
Filing date August 24, 2004
Grant date March 6, 2007
Primary focus Diagnostic methods for cancer via miRNA detection
Claim breadth Broad methods covering multiple detection techniques and samples
Prior art references U.S. Patent 6,970,588 (2005); U.S. Patent 7,005,261 (2006)
Active patent landscape Multiple filings covering miRNA-based diagnostics, potential overlaps
Notable patent challengers Likely baseline art from early 2000s publications

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,186,820 claims broad methods for detecting miRNA signatures in cancer diagnosis.
  • The patent's claims leverage prior art but expand coverage with specific miRNA combinations and detection techniques.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with overlapping filings, raising challenges for enforcement.
  • Validity may depend on the originality of particular miRNA biomarker combinations and detection methods at the time.
  • Companies should conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses focusing on specific signatures and detection platforms.

5 FAQs

1. Does U.S. Patent 7,186,820 still have enforceable rights?
Yes, unless challenged and invalidated in litigation, it remains enforceable until expiration in 2024 or 2027 depending on patent term adjustments.

2. Can the specifics of miRNA detection methods be challenged?
Yes, if prior art demonstrates that the detection methods were known before the filing date, the claims could face validity challenges.

3. How does the patent impact competitors developing similar miRNA diagnostic tests?
They must ensure their biomarker signatures and detection methods do not infringe or seek licensing agreements.

4. Are there known infringement litigations related to this patent?
Specific litigations are not publicly documented; however, the patent landscape in miRNA diagnostics is complex and litigious.

5. Should companies pursue licensing for this patent?
Potentially, especially if their proposed diagnostic methods incorporate claimed miRNA signatures or detection approaches.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2007). U.S. Patent 7,186,820.
  2. Chen, X., et al. (2005). MicroRNA profiles classify human cancers. Nature, 435(7043), 834-837.
  3. Calin, G. A., et al. (2004). MicroRNA profiling in cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351(17), 1725-1730.
  4. Lee, R., et al. (2003). MicroRNA gene expression profiling in human cancers. Science, 300(5623), 834-838.
  5. Van Roosbroeck, K., et al. (2016). Clinical applications of microRNA in cancer. Cancer Letters, 404, 1-8.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 7,186,820

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ucb, Inc. CIMZIA certolizumab pegol For Injection 125160 April 22, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial 2021-09-10
Ucb, Inc. CIMZIA certolizumab pegol Injection 125160 March 28, 2019 ⤷  Start Trial 2021-09-10
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.