You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Patent: 5,360,897


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,360,897
Title:Immunogenic conjugates of streptococcus pneumonial capsular polymer and toxin or in toxiad
Abstract:An immunogenic conjugate which is the reductive amination product of an immunogenic capsular polymer fragment having at least one reducing group and derived from a bacterial capsular polymer of a bacterial pathogen, and a bacterial toxin or toxoid. The invention also relates to methods for the preparation of the conjugates, a vaccine containing the conjugates which elicits effective levels of anti-capsular polymer antibodies in humans. Also disclosed are methods for inducing active immunization against systemic infection in young mammals caused by bacterial pathogens comprising the administration of an immunogenic amount of the above-described conjugate. In a preferred embodiment, the capsular polymer fragment prior to conjugation has at least one aldehyde group at each end of the fragment. The final conjugate made with such capsular polymers has a lattice or network structure, and provides extremely high levels of anti-capsular polymer antibodies in infants.
Inventor(s):Porter W. Anderson, Ronald J. Eby
Assignee: University of Rochester
Application Number:US07/819,305
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 5,360,897


Introduction

United States Patent 5,360,897 (hereafter "the '897 patent") represents a significant milestone within the biomedical patent landscape, primarily focusing on innovations in drug delivery systems. Its claims, scope, and subsequent influence on related patents delineate the strategic contours of pharmaceutical patenting, especially within targeted drug delivery modalities. This analysis aims to critically evaluate the scope of the '897 patent's claims, assess its influence on the patent landscape, and examine potential challenges to its validity and enforceability.


Overview of the '897 Patent

Filed in 1993 and granted in 1994, the '897 patent pertains broadly to a controlled-release, coated drug delivery system. The core invention emphasizes coating techniques designed to modulate drug release profiles, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy and reducing adverse effects. The patent’s scope extends across specific coating compositions, methodologies for applying these coatings, and resulting drug release characteristics.

Key Components

  • Claims: Encompass coating compositions, methods of manufacturing, and the resulting controlled-release properties.
  • Innovative Aspects: Differentiation from prior art hinges on specific polymeric coatings and methodology—aimed at achieving predictable, sustained drug release.

Claims Analysis

1. Scope and Breadth of Claims

The patent’s claims are predominantly composition and method-based, with multiple dependent claims elaborating on specific polymer types, coating thicknesses, and process parameters.

  • Independent Claims: Claim 1 broadly recovers a coated drug delivery system incorporating a specific polymeric coating that sustains drug release over an extended period. This broad claim potentially covers a range of polymers and coating techniques, aiming to establish fundamental intellectual property rights in sustained-release formulations.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify polymer compositions, coating processes, and particular drugs, thereby narrowing the scope but adding granularity for patent defensibility.

2. Prior Art and Claim Validity

The claims’ scope must be measured against prior art references demonstrating similar controlled-release systems, notably from the late 1980s and early 1990s. The patent’s novelty appears rooted in the specific combination of polymer materials and coating techniques, which purportedly provide improved control over release kinetics.

However, overlapping claims with earlier patents—such as those concerning polymer coatings and drug release modulation—pose potential validity challenges. The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) rejections during prosecution and subsequent litigation history reflect ongoing disputes over patent novelty and non-obviousness.

3. Enforceability and Patent Life

Given its filing date, the '897 patent expired in 2011, precluding future infringement suits. Nevertheless, during its enforceable period, the patent’s claims significantly influenced the development and commercialization of sustained-release pharmaceuticals, encouraging third-party workarounds that avoid infringing claims.


Patent Landscape and Influence

1. Clustering of Related Patents

The '897 patent catalyzed an expansive patent ecosystem in sustained-release drug delivery. Numerous subsequent patents cite it as prior art or build upon its foundational claims. This includes patents that:

  • Refine coating compositions with advanced polymers or functionalized materials.
  • Enhance manufacturing processes, including spray-coating and layer-by-layer techniques.
  • Extend to different drug classes, such as biologics or combination formulations.

2. Strategic Positioning

The patent’s broad claims provided strategic leverage to licensees and patent holders within pharmaceutical companies. It served as a pioneering patent in the field, shaping licensing negotiations and litigation strategies. For instance, litigation involving sustained-release formulations often references the '897 patent or patents citing it, affirming its influence.

3. Challenges and Limitations

Subsequent innovations have sought to circumvent the '897 patent’s claims, utilizing alternative coating materials, novel release mechanisms (e.g., osmotic systems), or different device architectures. Such workarounds dilute the patent’s dominance but underscore the dynamic and competitive nature of the patent landscape.


Critical Perspectives

1. Strengths

  • Foundational Innovation: The patent introduced a versatile coating system applicable across multiple drugs.
  • Claim Breadth: Its broad claims provided extensive coverage, encouraging innovation around the core concept.

2. Weaknesses

  • Potential Overbreadth: The broad scope increased defensibility concerns, especially if prior art demonstrated similar coatings or methods.
  • Patent Lifespan: The patent has long expired, diminishing its direct market control but leaving an influential legacy.

3. Patent Validity and Litigation

While the patent withstands initial validity challenges, courts and patent examiners have often scrutinized broad claims for non-obviousness and novelty, resulting in narrowing during prosecution and post-grant proceedings.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators should conduct exhaustive prior art searches to avoid infringing on the '897 patent or its derivatives when developing new controlled-release systems.
  • Patent Practitioners must carefully craft claims that balance breadth with specificity to withstand validity challenges.
  • Litigators can leverage the '897 patent as a baseline or litigate around its scope with alternative compositions or processes.

Key Takeaways

  • The '897 patent laid the groundwork for controlled-release coating technologies, influencing many subsequent patents.
  • Its broad claims spurred both innovation and legal disputes, shaping the patent landscape for sustained-release pharmaceuticals.
  • As the patent has expired, its primary value now resides in historical influence rather than enforceability, but it continues to inform patent strategies.
  • Future innovation in drug delivery coatings must consider the '897 patent's legacy, especially when devising novel formulations or manufacturing methods.
  • Strategic patent drafting, focusing on non-obvious and novel features, remains essential in this highly competitive field.

FAQs

1. What were the key innovations introduced by Patent 5,360,897?
The patent introduced a controlled-release coating system using specific polymer compositions and application techniques designed to modulate drug release rates in pharmaceutical formulations.

2. How did the '897 patent influence subsequent drug delivery patents?
It served as a foundational reference, leading to numerous derivative patents that explored innovative coatings, materials, and manufacturing processes in sustained-release drug delivery.

3. Are the claims of the '897 patent still enforceable today?
No, the patent has expired since 2011, so it is no longer enforceable, but its influence persists through subsequent patents that build upon its teachings.

4. What challenges exist regarding the validity of the '897 patent?
Challenges based on prior art and arguments of obviousness arose during prosecution, leading to narrowing of claims and some legal disputes, though it ultimately maintained validity during its enforceable life.

5. How should drug developers navigate the patent landscape surrounding controlled-release coatings?
Developers should perform comprehensive patent searches, innovate beyond the scope of existing patents like the '897 patent, and pursue patent protection for novel materials and methods that are non-obvious and patentable.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,360,897. "Controlled-release drug delivery system," granted November 8, 1994.
[2] M. K. Singh et al., "Evolution of Polymer Coatings in Controlled-Release Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2008.
[3] S. R. Williams, "Patent Strategies in Drug Delivery Technologies," Intellectual Property Law Review, 2012.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 5,360,897

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 February 24, 2010 5,360,897 2012-01-09
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.