Last Updated: September 24, 2026

Pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein)
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:22
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Pharmacology for pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein)
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 11,013,793 2039-09-12 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 11,147,864 2039-02-04 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 11,642,406 2039-12-17 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 4,902,506 2007-02-20 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 5,306,492 2012-07-30 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 5,360,897 2012-01-09 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Pneumococcal 13-Valent Conjugate Vaccine Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: September 8, 2026

Pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine, marketed primarily as Prevnar 13 by Pfizer, remains a major commercial vaccine but is in structural decline in high-income markets. Its revenue base is being displaced by higher-valency products, especially Pfizer’s Prevnar 20, Merck’s Vaxneuvance and Capvaxive, and government immunization-policy changes. The product retains value in pediatric programs, emerging markets, public tenders and countries that have not fully transitioned to newer vaccines.

Pfizer reported Prevnar-family revenue of approximately $6.4 billion in 2023. That figure includes Prevnar 13 and newer Prevnar products and does not isolate PCV13 revenue. The key financial issue is therefore product-family migration rather than an abrupt loss of the franchise. [1]

What is pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine?

Pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine contains capsular polysaccharides from 13 Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes conjugated to a nontoxic diphtheria CRM197 carrier protein. The formulation is designed to generate an immune response in infants, young children and adults.

Prevnar 13 was developed by Wyeth and became part of Pfizer’s portfolio following Pfizer’s acquisition of Wyeth in 2009. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Prevnar 13 for infants and young children in February 2010 and later expanded its use to adults aged 50 and older. [2]

Product profile

Attribute Prevnar 13
Active technology 13 pneumococcal polysaccharides conjugated to CRM197
Sponsor Pfizer
U.S. product name Prevnar 13
FDA approval 2010 pediatric approval
Biological product Conjugate vaccine
Primary markets United States, Europe and international public-health markets
Main competitors Prevnar 20, Vaxneuvance, Capvaxive, Synflorix
Commercial status Mature product under displacement by higher-valency vaccines

When does Prevnar 13 lose exclusivity?

Prevnar 13 has passed the period of practical market exclusivity associated with its original approval. The BPCIA’s 12-year reference-product exclusivity period for a biologic approved in 2010 would have ended in 2022, subject to statutory interpretation of the product’s first licensure date and any relevant regulatory complications. [3]

That date does not create automatic competitive entry. Vaccines are not interchangeable with ordinary small-molecule generics, and PCV13 is difficult to reproduce because its commercial value depends on serotype-specific polysaccharide production, conjugation chemistry, analytical controls, immunogenicity data and manufacturing consistency.

The product’s effective protection has therefore depended more on manufacturing scale, regulatory approvals, procurement contracts, brand recognition and Pfizer’s integrated vaccine platform than on a single unexpired composition patent.

Patent and regulatory protection

Publicly available product-level patent information is less useful for PCV13 than for an oral small-molecule drug. Relevant protection can include:

  • Serotype-specific polysaccharide preparation.
  • CRM197 conjugation methods.
  • Carrier-protein and linker chemistry.
  • Formulation and adjuvant systems.
  • Manufacturing controls and purification processes.
  • Combination-vaccine applications.
  • Device and packaging claims.

The original composition and technology patents are unlikely to block all competitors indefinitely. The larger barrier is the cumulative manufacturing and clinical package. A rival must demonstrate acceptable safety, immunogenicity, serotype coverage and production reliability.

What is the FDA regulatory status of Prevnar 13?

Prevnar 13 remains a licensed biologic vaccine, but its strategic position in the U.S. adult market has weakened sharply. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now recommends higher-valency pneumococcal vaccines for many adult populations, including PCV20 or PCV21 alone, or PCV15 followed by PPSV23 in specified circumstances. [4]

For children, the CDC recommends either PCV15 or PCV20 for routine vaccination. PCV13 remains relevant where product availability, procurement rules or local policy supports its use, but it is no longer the default growth product in the U.S. pediatric market. [5]

Orange Book and Purple Book status

Prevnar 13 is a biologic licensed under a biologics license application. The Orange Book is primarily used for approved small-molecule drugs and does not function as the principal patent-listing database for biologics.

The FDA’s Purple Book is the relevant reference for licensed biological products and biosimilar or interchangeable products. The absence of a conventional Orange Book patent listing should not be interpreted as the absence of intellectual-property protection.

How many products compete with Prevnar 13?

The competitive field has shifted from one dominant PCV13 product to a higher-valency market.

Product Sponsor Valency Market position
Prevnar 13 Pfizer 13 Mature, declining
Vaxneuvance Merck 15 Pediatric and adult competitor
Prevnar 20 Pfizer 20 Pfizer’s principal replacement product
Capvaxive Merck 21 Adult-focused higher-valency entrant
Synflorix GSK 10 International and pediatric presence
Pneumovax 23 Merck 23 Polysaccharide vaccine, not a conjugate equivalent

The competitive comparison is not based solely on valency. Serotype epidemiology, pediatric efficacy, adult immunogenicity, national schedules, procurement price and evidence for invasive pneumococcal disease all affect product selection.

How does Prevnar 13 compare with Prevnar 20?

Prevnar 20 is the principal successor to Prevnar 13 within Pfizer’s portfolio. It adds seven serotypes and offers broader coverage than PCV13. The commercial strategy is substitution: Pfizer can migrate patients, physicians, health systems and public purchasers to a higher-valency product while retaining the Prevnar franchise.

Factor Prevnar 13 Prevnar 20
Serotypes 13 20
Commercial maturity Mature Growth and replacement product
Pediatric role Reduced in the U.S. Increasingly preferred where recommended
Adult role Declining Principal Pfizer adult product
Pricing power Under pressure Stronger while protected as newer technology
Revenue outlook Decline or stabilization at lower base Growth, subject to competition

Prevnar 20 received FDA approval for adults in 2021 and expanded pediatric approval in 2024. [6] The pediatric indication is particularly important because routine childhood vaccination creates recurring, population-scale demand.

What is the financial trajectory of the Prevnar franchise?

Pfizer’s reported Prevnar-family revenue has remained in the multibillion-dollar range, but the composition of that revenue is changing.

Year Pfizer Prevnar-family revenue Interpretation
2021 Approximately $5.9 billion Strong franchise before full higher-valency transition
2022 Approximately $6.3 billion Continued demand and product expansion
2023 Approximately $6.4 billion Family-level resilience, with newer products contributing
2024 onward Product-level trajectory diverges Prevnar 13 declines while Prevnar 20 absorbs demand

Sources report the franchise rather than a clean Prevnar 13-only figure. Pfizer’s filings group Prevnar products, which limits direct measurement of PCV13 revenue erosion. [1]

Revenue drivers

The franchise has five major revenue drivers:

  1. Pediatric birth cohorts create recurring demand and reduce dependence on adult booster campaigns.
  2. Government procurement determines large portions of volume outside the private U.S. market.
  3. Higher-valency products support premium pricing and product migration.
  4. Adult recommendations can rapidly shift demand between PCV13, PCV15, PCV20 and PCV21.
  5. International vaccination coverage remains below levels in the United States and Western Europe, creating long-term volume opportunity.

Revenue risks

PCV13 revenue faces several direct risks:

  • Replacement by PCV20 in adult and pediatric schedules.
  • Merck’s Vaxneuvance and Capvaxive competing for public and private contracts.
  • Tender-driven price compression in emerging markets.
  • Lower adult use after the CDC moved away from routine PCV13 use for many adults.
  • Inventory reductions as national programs transition products.
  • Manufacturing capacity being reallocated toward newer vaccines.

What patent litigation affects Prevnar 13?

No broad, generic-style Paragraph IV litigation cycle defines the U.S. PCV13 market. That reflects the regulatory structure of vaccines and the complexity of demonstrating a substitutable conjugate product.

A competitor could challenge patents through district-court litigation, inter partes review or other post-grant procedures. In practice, the commercial threat is more likely to arise from an independently developed, separately licensed vaccine than from an automatic generic launch.

The principal legal risk is therefore patent and regulatory competition around next-generation PCVs, not a conventional tablet-generic event. Pfizer’s more material defensive position comes from product know-how, clinical data, manufacturing capacity and market access.

Are there biosimilar risks for pneumococcal 13-valent vaccine?

Biosimilar risk is limited in the near term. A biosimilar or interchangeable designation is technically possible for a complex biologic, but conjugate vaccines present unusual comparability problems.

A competitor would need to address:

  • Identity and purity of each polysaccharide.
  • Degree and site of conjugation to CRM197.
  • Molecular size and aggregation.
  • Serotype-specific immune responses.
  • Stability across the product’s shelf life.
  • Manufacturing consistency across multiple antigens.
  • Clinical and postmarketing safety requirements.

The greater threat is a new multivalent conjugate vaccine, not a biosimilar version of PCV13. Higher-valency products also make direct PCV13 replication less attractive commercially.

What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers protect the product?

The manufacturing process is a material barrier even where patent protection has weakened. PCV13 requires the coordinated production of 13 bacterial polysaccharide antigens, purification of each antigen, activation and conjugation to CRM197, formulation, filling and lot-release testing.

Manufacturing barriers include:

  • Specialized fermentation and purification infrastructure.
  • Validated conjugation processes.
  • Serotype-specific analytical assays.
  • High-volume sterile filling capacity.
  • Cold-chain distribution.
  • Regulatory comparability data.
  • Supplier qualification for complex biological inputs.

These barriers support continued commercial value for Pfizer in lower-income and tender markets, where the company’s scale can matter more than premium pricing.

Which companies are challenging Pfizer in the pneumococcal vaccine market?

Merck is Pfizer’s principal global competitor in higher-valency conjugate vaccines. Vaxneuvance competes in pediatric and adult indications, while Capvaxive targets additional adult serotypes and was approved by the FDA in 2024. [7]

GSK’s Synflorix remains relevant in international pediatric markets, although its 10-valent coverage limits direct comparability with PCV13, PCV15 and PCV20.

The market is likely to divide into three segments:

  • Higher-income adult markets dominated by PCV20 and PCV21.
  • Pediatric markets where national schedules determine PCV15, PCV20 or legacy PCV13 use.
  • International tender markets where price, supply reliability and World Health Organization policy influence product selection.

What generic launch scenarios exist for PCV13?

A conventional generic launch scenario is unlikely. The realistic scenarios are:

Scenario Probability profile Commercial effect
Direct biosimilar-style PCV13 Low near-term Could pressure price if approved and interchangeable
Independent PCV13-like vaccine Moderate technical possibility Requires major clinical and manufacturing investment
PCV15 or PCV20 replacement High Accelerates legacy PCV13 decline
Tender-driven substitution High in price-sensitive markets Reduces volume or net price
Continued PCV13 use in selected markets High Extends tail revenue

What licensing deals support the product?

Prevnar 13 is principally a Pfizer-owned franchise following the Wyeth acquisition. Pfizer’s public filings identify the product as part of its internal Prevnar portfolio rather than a major current royalty-bearing external license. [1]

The acquisition itself remains commercially important because it transferred the product, manufacturing platform and related pneumococcal vaccine capabilities into Pfizer’s global vaccine business. No major new licensing transaction is required for the current PCV13-to-PCV20 migration strategy.

How strong is the Prevnar 13 patent estate?

The patent estate is commercially moderate rather than absolute. The original product has reached maturity, and the strongest protection now comes from cumulative know-how, regulatory history, manufacturing scale and portfolio substitution.

Protection category Relative strength
Original product exclusivity Low to moderate
Manufacturing know-how High
Clinical and regulatory package High
Brand and physician familiarity Moderate
Pediatric procurement access High where contracts remain
Adult market protection Low after higher-valency recommendations
Direct biosimilar deterrence Moderate to high

Key Takeaways

  • Prevnar 13 is a mature biologic vaccine under replacement, not immediate abandonment.
  • Pfizer’s Prevnar-family revenue was approximately $6.4 billion in 2023, but reported figures combine PCV13 with newer products.
  • Prevnar 20 is the main successor and is absorbing demand from PCV13.
  • Merck’s Vaxneuvance and Capvaxive increase competitive pressure.
  • Adult U.S. demand has shifted toward higher-valency products following CDC recommendations.
  • Pediatric use remains commercially relevant, but PCV15 and PCV20 have stronger strategic positioning.
  • Patent expiry is less important than manufacturing complexity, clinical evidence and procurement access.
  • Conventional generic entry is unlikely; independent higher-valency competition is the more credible threat.
  • PCV13 revenue should decline in developed markets while retaining a longer commercial tail in international and tender-driven markets.

FAQs

Is Prevnar 13 still used in children?

Yes. Prevnar 13 remains licensed and may be used in markets or programs that have not transitioned to PCV15 or PCV20. Its U.S. strategic position has weakened as newer vaccines gain preference.

Is Prevnar 13 interchangeable with Prevnar 20?

They are not automatically interchangeable in every setting. Product selection depends on CDC guidance, patient history, age, risk factors and jurisdiction-specific recommendations.

Does Prevnar 13 have a biosimilar competitor?

No widely established biosimilar or interchangeable PCV13 competitor has displaced Prevnar 13 in the U.S. market. Competition is primarily from independently developed higher-valency conjugate vaccines.

Why does CRM197 matter in PCV13 manufacturing?

CRM197 is the carrier protein that links pneumococcal polysaccharides to create a stronger immune response. The conjugation process affects product quality, immunogenicity and manufacturing comparability.

What is the long-term investment thesis for PCV13?

PCV13 has a declining standalone outlook but remains part of a valuable Pfizer pneumococcal franchise. The financial thesis depends on Pfizer’s ability to convert PCV13 demand into Prevnar 20 demand while preserving pediatric and international volume.

References

  1. Pfizer Inc. (2024). 2023 annual report. Pfizer.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2010). FDA approves new pneumococcal vaccine for children. FDA.
  3. Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 262.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Pneumococcal vaccine recommendations. CDC.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Child and adolescent immunization schedule by age. CDC.
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Prevnar 20 approval for pediatric use. FDA.
  7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). FDA approves Capvaxive pneumococcal 21-valent conjugate vaccine. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.