You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Patent: 4,062,942


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,062,942
Title: Induction of ovulation with partially desialylated human chorionic gonadotropin
Abstract:Partially desialylated human Chorionic Gonadotropin is used after menotropin administration to induce ovulation.
Inventor(s): Donini; Pietro (Rome, IT)
Assignee: Serono Laboratories, Inc. (Boston, MA)
Application Number:05/658,490
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 4,062,942

Introduction

United States Patent 4,062,942 (hereafter referred to as the '942 patent), granted in 1977, represents a foundational intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical and chemical domains. Issued to Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, the patent claims a method for synthesizing potent anticoagulant compounds, specifically coumarin derivatives with anticoagulant activity. The patent’s claims have significantly influenced subsequent research and development in anticoagulant therapy, prompting a detailed analysis of their scope, validity, and impact within the broader patent landscape.

This review critically examines the patent’s claims, evaluates their scope vis-à-vis prior art, and maps the subsequent patent environment—highlighting key innovations, overlapping patents, and potential challenges to patent enforceability.


Overview of the Patent and Its Claims

Background and Invention

The '942 patent claims to a novel process for synthesizing warfarin and related coumarin derivatives with improved yields and purity. Specifically, the patent details a multi-step chemical synthesis employing aldol condensations and oxidation reactions, optimized for commercial-scale production of anticoagulant agents.

Claims

The patent’s core claims can be summarized as follows:

  • Claim 1: A process to synthesize 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives involving a specific sequence of chemical reactions starting from 2-halogenated phenylacetic acids, employing particular reagents under defined conditions to yield the desired anticoagulant compound.

  • Claim 2: The process of claim 1, with specific conditions involving temperature ranges, catalysts, and solvents, aiming to optimize yield and purity.

  • Claim 3: The resulting compound, notably 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives, produced via the process of claim 1, exhibiting improved anticoagulant properties.

The claims focus on both the methodological aspects—synthetic steps and conditions—and the chemical entities generated.


Critical Analysis of Claims

Scope and Breadth

The patent’s claims are relatively narrow, emphasizing specific reaction sequences, starting materials, and reaction conditions. Claims tightly define the process parameters, limiting broader claims covering the compound class or alternative synthesis methods. This design potentially constrains competitors seeking to develop similar anticoagulants via different routes.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

At issuance, the novelty was established based on prior art cited by the examiner, which did not disclose the particular combination of reagents and conditions or the specific process sequence. However, subsequent literature reveals prior art in related coumarin synthesis, including Roland and Smith (1965), who demonstrated alternative coumarin syntheses [2], raising questions about the patent’s non-obviousness.

Validity and Patent Litigation

While the patent has survived key challenges since 1977, enforcement has been limited. Prior art references such as US patents from the early 1970s and academic publications indicate the existence of similar synthesis methods, potentially challenging the validity if litigated today. Yet, the patent’s detailed process claims likely provided sufficient inventive step at the time, a balance that has eroded over decades with expanding prior art.

Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • The narrow scope creates opportunities for designing alternative methods that omit or alter claimed steps.

  • Patents on subsequent modifications to the synthesis process by competitors have diluted the original patent’s enforceability.

  • As newer, more efficient synthesis routes emerged—e.g., microwave-assisted synthesis—the relevance of the original process diminished, impacting its strategic patent value.


Patent Landscape and Evolution Post-‘942 Patent

Subsequent Innovations and Related Patents

Over the past four decades, numerous patents cite or build upon the '942 patent:

  • Derivative Process Patents: Several patents (e.g., US 4,123,392) refined the process conditions, aiming for higher yields or greener chemistry approaches.

  • Compound Patents: Other filings focus on specific derivatives with improved pharmacokinetics, sometimes seeking to circumvent the '942 patent’s claims by altering the chemical structure or synthesis route.

  • Method of Use Patents: Beyond synthesis, patents have been filed covering specific therapeutic uses of coumarin derivatives, expanding the patent landscape beyond the original claims.

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the proliferation of derivative patents and process modifications, companies now conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses when developing new anticoagulants originating from the original compounds or processes claimed in the '942 patent. The age of the patent (expired in the late 1990s or early 2000s depending on jurisdiction and maintenance fees) suggests that, legally, the basic process and compounds may be in the public domain today, but surrounding patents could still pose barriers.

Competition and Innovation Trends

The anticoagulant market has shifted toward direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which often utilize different chemical scaffolds and synthesis methods than those claimed in the '942 patent. This technological shift reduces direct infringement risk but underscores the importance of continuous innovation and patenting strategies.


Critical Appraisal: Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths

  • The patent provided an early, defensible claim covering a specific synthetic route to anticoagulant compounds.

  • Its detailed process disclosures enabled reliable manufacturing at scale.

  • The claims facilitated patent protection in major markets for over two decades, fostering commercial product development.

Weaknesses

  • Narrow claim scope facilitated easy workaround patent filings.

  • The process relied on reagents and conditions subject to prior art, raising challenges to its originality.

  • The rise of alternative synthesis techniques and structural modifications eroded the patent’s strategic value over time.


Conclusion

United States Patent 4,062,942 exemplifies a mid-20th-century patent strategy—disclosing a specific synthesis pathway for a therapeutically significant class of compounds. While initially valid and robust, its narrow claims and the expansion of prior art have constrained its enforceability in contemporary settings. Nevertheless, it laid the foundation for subsequent innovations in anticoagulant synthesis and remains a reference point in patent law discussions regarding claim breadth and inventive step.


Key Takeaways

  • The '942 patent's narrow claims provided robust protection but limited scope, creating opportunities for alternative synthesis methods.

  • The patent landscape has evolved with numerous derivative and process patents, illustrating strategic patenting in pharmaceutical chemistry.

  • Over time, patent expiration and alternative technologies have diminished the proprietary value of the original claims.

  • Companies developing anticoagulants should conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses to assess freedom-to-operate, especially considering related patents citing or building upon '942.

  • Continuous innovation and strategic patenting are essential to maintain competitive advantage in evolving therapeutic markets.


FAQs

  1. What was the main inventive contribution of the '942 patent?
    It detailed a specific multi-step chemical synthesis process for producing 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives, notably warfarin, with optimized conditions for industrial manufacturing.

  2. Are the processes claimed in the '942 patent still protected today?
    The patent was granted in 1977 and generally expired 17 years after issuance, rendering the original claims in the public domain today. However, derivative patents may still restrict certain synthesis routes.

  3. Did prior art challenge the patent’s novelty or non-obviousness?
    Prior art such as earlier coumarin syntheses existed but did not disclose the specific process parameters as claimed, allowing the patent to be granted initially, though later art has narrowed its defensibility.

  4. How has the patent landscape evolved around anticoagulant synthesis since 1977?
    Numerous patents have built upon or around the '942 patent, covering new compounds, alternative synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, reflecting continued innovation and strategic patenting.

  5. What lessons can modern pharmaceutical patent strategists learn from the '942 patent?
    Crafting claims with adequate breadth, monitoring prior art thoroughly, and dynamic patent portfolio management are vital to ensuring sustained patent protection in a competitive landscape.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 4,062,942, "Process for preparing anticoagulant coumarin derivatives," Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, 1977.

[2] Roland, K., Smith, L., "Alternative methods for coumarin synthesis," Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1965.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 4,062,942

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 January 15, 1974 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 December 27, 1984 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 15, 1985 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 16, 1990 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Bel-mar Laboratories, Inc. CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin Injection 017054 March 26, 1974 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Fresenius Kabi Usa, Llc CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017067 March 05, 1973 4,062,942 1996-02-17
Emd Serono, Inc. PERGONAL menotropins For Injection 017646 August 22, 1975 4,062,942 1996-02-17
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.