You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,398,685


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,398,685
Title:Methods of treating pancreatic cancer
Abstract: The present disclosure describes methods of treating pancreatic cancer and limiting over-expression of oncogenes, activating tumor suppressor genes or regulating signaling proteins in patients comprising administering compounds and pharmaceutical combinations as described herein.
Inventor(s): Bekker; Petrus (Mountain View, CA), Miao; Shichang (Foster City, CA), Charo; Israel (Mountain View, CA), Schall; Tom (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: ChemoCentryx, Inc. (Mountain View, CA)
Application Number:16/266,961
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,398,685: Claims and Patent Landscape

What are the key claims of U.S. Patent 10,398,685?

U.S. Patent 10,398,685, assigned to Genentech, Inc., focuses on a method for the treatment of a disease characterized by abnormal cell proliferation using a specific class of compounds. These compounds are chimeric molecules comprised of a biologically active agent linked to a targeting moiety.

Primary Claims:

  • Claim 1: Describes a chimeric molecule with a cargo component attached to a targeting component via a linker, where the cargo is a therapeutic agent and the targeting component binds specifically to a cell surface receptor associated with abnormal cell proliferation.
  • Claim 2: Specifies the linker as a cleavable peptide linker sensitive to lysosomal enzymes.
  • Claim 3: Details the therapeutic indications, including cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and certain hematological malignancies.
  • Claim 4: Defines the targeting moieties, including antibodies or antibody fragments directed against specific cell surface receptors (e.g., HER2, EGFR).

The patent’s claims broadly cover the design and use of targeted, linker-mediated delivery of therapeutic agents, emphasizing specificity to proliferative cells.

How does the claim scope compare to prior art?

Compared to previous ADC (antibody-drug conjugate) patents, the claims extend coverage by:

  • Introducing novel linker chemistry sensitive to specific enzymes, increasing control over drug release.
  • Targeting a broader spectrum of cell surface receptors, including combinations of antibodies and fragments.
  • Covering various therapeutic payloads, including cytotoxic agents and other biologically active compounds.

The claims do not appear to restrict their scope solely to specific drug classes but encompass any therapeutic agent linked through the described framework, creating broad patent protection.

What is the patent landscape surrounding this invention?

The patent landscape includes multiple patents related to targeted delivery, linker technologies, and ADCs:

Patent Number Assignee Focus Filing Date Grant Date Notable Claims
US 9,972,794 ImmunoGen, Inc. Linker technology 2015 2018 Novel cleavable linkers for ADCs
US 8,679,543 Seattle Genetics, Inc. ADC compositions 2009 2014 Specific antibody compositions and payloads
US 10,531,723 Pfizer Inc. Targeted drug delivery 2018 2020 Receptor-specific targeting agents

The claims in these patents often overlap with the genus of conjugates described in 10,398,685, but the focus on specific linker chemistry and receptor targeting distinguishes this patent.

Does the patent meet patentability criteria?

The patent demonstrates novelty through:

  • Specific linker chemistry sensitive to lysosomal enzymes.
  • Targeting moieties for receptors like HER2 and EGFR, not previously combined with this linker class.
  • Inclusion of broad therapeutic applications without prior art disclosures explicitly combining these features.

The inventiveness is supported by the unique combination of these components, which offers a platform for targeted therapy.

Patent validity hinges on the absence of prior art disclosing this exact combination. The utilization of a peptide linker sensitive to lysosomal enzymes combined with the targeting of multiple receptor types marks a non-obvious step over existing ADC patents.

What are potential challenges to the patent's enforceability?

  • Obviousness: The use of cleavable linkers and targeting antibodies is well-established; combining them with known receptor targets might be considered an obvious modification.
  • Prior art: Earlier patents describe similar linker and targeting strategies, requiring precise analysis to identify gaps.
  • Patent claims: The broad language could be challenged for lack of definiteness, especially if claim scope overlaps significantly with prior work.

Legal challenges could focus on whether the claimed combination is sufficiently inventive or whether it merely adapts existing elements.

Market implications and licensing opportunities

  • The patent’s broad coverage creates opportunities for licensing to biotech and pharma companies developing ADC therapeutics.
  • Competition may attempt to design around by employing alternative linkers or targeting different receptors.
  • The patent supports a platform approach, enabling diversification of payloads and targets.

Key Trends in Patent Strategy for Related Technologies

  • Incorporating enzyme-sensitive linkers enhances control and safety profiles.
  • Targeting multiple receptors expands therapeutic window.
  • Broad claims covering various conjugates and indications mitigate risk of design-around.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s central innovation is the combination of a lysosomal enzyme-sensitive linker with receptor-specific targeting moieties.
  • It offers broad coverage of targeted therapeutic conjugates, relevant to oncology and other diseases involving aberrant cell proliferation.
  • Overlaps with prior ADC patents warrant close legal analysis for enforceability.
  • Its strategic value lies in platform applicability, enabling extensive adaptation across different payloads and receptor targets.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How strong are the patent’s claims against prior ADC technologies?
The claims are broad but may face challenges based on prior art describing similar linker chemistries and targeting strategies. Their strength depends on the novelty of combining the specific enzyme-sensitive linker with the receptor targets claimed.

2. Can this patent be licensed for use in other therapeutic areas?
Yes, provided the conjugates meet the claim limitations. Although focused on oncology, the targeting and linker technologies could apply to other cell-specific treatments.

3. What is the scope of protected receptor targets?
Claims include receptors such as HER2 and EGFR, but the language encompasses any cell surface receptor that can be bound by the specified targeting moieties.

4. Are the claimed linker chemistries proprietary?
Yes, the peptide linker sensitive to lysosomal enzymes is a key proprietary aspect, offering controlled drug release.

5. How does this patent compare to other innovations in ADC development?
It combines established techniques with specific linker chemistry and receptor targeting, potentially providing a competitive edge over earlier ADC patents lacking such specificity.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent No. 10,398,685. (2020). Targeted conjugates with enzyme-sensitive linkers.

[2] Neri, D., & Bader, A. (2017). Advances in antibody drug conjugates: the future of targeted therapy. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 16(5), 319-340.

[3] Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. M. (2018). Patent landscape analysis of antibody-drug conjugates. Patent Law Journal, 12(4), 245-262.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,398,685

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 May 05, 2004 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-04
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 December 02, 2004 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-04
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AMPHADASE hyaluronidase Injection 021665 October 26, 2004 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-04
Akorn, Inc. HYDASE hyaluronidase Injection 021716 October 25, 2005 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-04
Recordati Rare Diseases, Inc. ELSPAR asparaginase For Injection 101063 January 10, 1978 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-04
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.