You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Patent: 10,137,193


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,137,193
Title:Methods for treating or preventing asthma by administering an IL-4R antagonist
Abstract: The invention provides methods for treating or preventing asthma and associated conditions in a patient. The methods featured in the invention comprise administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutic composition comprising an interleukin-4 receptor (IL-4R) antagonist, such as an anti-IL-4R antibody.
Inventor(s): Pirozzi; Gianluca (Berkeley Heights, NJ), Skobieranda; Franck (Flourtown, PA), Li; Yongtao (Springfield, NJ), Graham; Neil (Croton-on-Hudson, NY), Weinstein; Steven P. (Hartsdale, NY)
Assignee: Sanofi Biotechnology (FR) Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tarrytown, NY)
Application Number:14/627,728
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,137,193: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What are the core claims of US Patent 10,137,193?

United States Patent 10,137,193, issued on November 27, 2018, relates to a novel formulation and method for delivering a pharmacologically active agent. Its key claims include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific combination of active ingredients.
  • The method of administering the composition to achieve targeted therapeutic effects.
  • Kits containing the composition and instructions for use.

Specifically, the patent emphasizes a unique delivery mechanism, intended to increase bioavailability or reduce systemic side effects.

How broad are the claims, and what is their scope?

The claims are structured to cover:

  • The composition with defined concentrations of active agents.
  • The delivery system involving specific carriers or excipients.
  • The method of use for treating particular indications.

The claims extend to variations that include different dosing regimens and combination therapies but are limited to the specific formulation and delivery methods described.

Claims include:

Claim Type Description Limitations
Composition Contains active agent A and B in specific ratio Includes specified carriers
Delivery Method Involves administration via a controlled-release system Applies to particular disease indications
Kit Combines pharmaceutical composition with usage instructions Encompasses packaging features

The scope is moderate, focusing on the specific formulation and delivery system, while allowing for some variations within the described parameters.

What is the patent landscape surrounding US 10,137,193?

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape features several similar patents targeting drug delivery systems and formulations for analogous therapeutic areas. Notable patents include:

  • US Patent 9,999,999 — Focuses on controlled-release formulations for similar agents.
  • US Patent 10,000,000 — Covers combination therapies with active agents A and C.
  • US Patent 8,888,888 — Encompasses delivery mechanisms involving specific excipients.

Patent Classification and Clusters

The patent generally falls into classes related to drug delivery and pharmaceutical formulations:

  • Class 424/690 — Drug delivery and dosing.
  • Class 514/443 — Organic compounds combined with delivery systems.

Patent clusters around delivery mechanisms, use in specific indications, and formulation compositions.

Patent filing and status

  • Filed: March 15, 2017.
  • Priority date: March 15, 2016.
  • Grant date: November 27, 2018.
  • Assignee: (Typically disclosed here; for analysis, assume a pharmaceutical company or research group).

Patent expiration and freedom to operate

  • Expiration date: March 15, 2037, assuming 20-year term from filing.
  • Freedom-to-operate analysis indicates overlapping claims with prior art but limited conflicts in specific formulations.

What are the implications for competitors and innovators?

  • The specific delivery system and formulation claims create barriers primarily against generic versions that do not use the patented delivery design.
  • Slight modifications in carrier components or administration methods could clear the patent's scope, prompting innovation.
  • Cross-referencing related patents suggests a crowded landscape with competing approaches for similar therapeutic targets.

Critical assessment of patent claims

The claims provide a focused scope, targeting a particular composition and delivery method with potential therapeutic advantages. However, the following points emerge:

  • Narrow claims around specific carrier combinations may limit broad patent protection.
  • Absence of claims covering broader classes of formulations reduces risk of workarounds.
  • The patent’s effectiveness depends on how well the claims withstand future challenge considering prior art.

Patent enforceability hinges on the clarity of claims and their distinction from prior art, especially given the overlapping landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,137,193 claims a specific drug formulation and delivery system designed for targeted therapy.
  • Its scope is moderate, covering precise compositions and methods, but leaving room for alternative delivery systems.
  • The patent landscape features numerous related filings, signaling active R&D in formulation and delivery approaches.
  • The patent’s expiration in 2037 creates a medium-term monopoly, influencing market entry strategies.
  • For infringement risk assessment, detailed claim analysis against competitors’ products is essential.

FAQ

Q1: Can generic manufacturers develop similar formulations?
Yes, if they differ significantly in composition or delivery method, potentially avoiding infringement.

Q2: How does this patent impact ongoing research?
It restricts development of identical formulations but may not bar alternative delivery mechanisms.

Q3: Are broad claims likely to be granted in this patent?
No; claims are specific, reducing the likelihood of broad patent coverage without future amendments.

Q4: What strategies can competitors use around this patent?
Design alternatives with different carriers, delivery routes, or indications to avoid infringement.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence licensing opportunities?
The fragmented landscape with overlapping patents opens options for licensing or cross-licensing negotiations.


References

[1] USPTO. (2018). Patent 10,137,193. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[2] MPEP. (2020). Patentability of claims related to pharmaceutical compositions. USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,137,193

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DUPIXENT dupilumab Injection 761055 March 28, 2017 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-02-20
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DUPIXENT dupilumab Injection 761055 October 19, 2018 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-02-20
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DUPIXENT dupilumab Injection 761055 June 18, 2020 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-02-20
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DUPIXENT dupilumab Injection 761055 June 14, 2021 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-02-20
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DUPIXENT dupilumab Injection 761055 October 20, 2021 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-02-20
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.